Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2007, 07:21 AM
darthpony darthpony is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jozi, South Africa
Posts: 3
Default Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

Hi guys

I'm currently running M-Powered, but I want to switch over to LE so that I can use the DV Toolkit.
I'm mainly looking at doing some post work, occasionally recording a bass/guitar/voice or MIDI.. Now, since the DV Toolkit is quite expensive and I'm working on limited budget, I'm looking at the Mbox 2 Factory..

I'm just worried about the USB transfer rate vs Firewire (Mbox 2 Pro)..

Can anyone give me some input? I have USB 2.0.

Regards,
S
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2007, 10:28 AM
casperfun casperfun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 489
Default Re: Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

Don't think too much. Their both quite capable of making music or else they won't be an option.

More investigation should be done on the computer it will be used on.

OO2R & Mbox2 owner.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2007, 04:04 PM
darthpony darthpony is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jozi, South Africa
Posts: 3
Default Re: Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

Pentium 4, 3.0ghz.
Intel mobo
2gb RAM
128mb graphics card.
80gb OS drive
250 data drive

That sound ok?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2007, 10:37 AM
cruisemates cruisemates is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 767
Default Re: Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

I said this years ago... Digi insists on firewire for outboard drives, however, I have recorded and mixed from a USB2 (emphasis on the 2) with no problems at all. If your drive has both kinds of cable attachments, you probably want to go to firewire, but personally (as stated above) they both have about the same throughput rate and I had no problems (though I do use firewire for my main drive).
__________________
- but the second mouse gets the cheese
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2007, 11:29 AM
Obsidian Dragon Obsidian Dragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,524
Default Re: Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

I think the questions was not so much about firewire vs. USB2.0 for the hard drive. The question was more about firewire vs. USB2.0 for the audio interface.

All the Digidesign interfaces work with the computer connection they are designed with. You will note that the firewire based 003,003R, 002, 002R, and Mbox 2 Pro have more i/o than the USB1.1 based Mbox (original), Mbox 2, and Mbox 2 Mini. The units were designed to work with the bandwidth necessary to support the number of i/o on the interface. At a time, USB ports were much more prevalent in most computers (Windows PC's at least) and therefore USB was a logical choice. As firewire gained popularity and was available on more systems, it was the logical choice for higher bandwidth interfaces that had more i/o needs. Since the discontinued Digi 001 uses a PCI card to connect to the computer, it uses neither USB nor firewire.

Now back to the hard drive choices: (in case that WAS the question)
Some clearly have used USB2.0 hard drives and it works for them. Others have had nothing but problems (things like increase buffer, decrease buffers, and something about system held off interrupts too long, etc.). Digidesign clearly states that you should use firewire and not USB for external hard drives so I wouldn't risk using USB if possible. Technically, firewire has a higher sustained throughput necessary for streaming high sample rate multitrack digital audio. Don't even think about USB1.0/1.1 hard drives.
__________________
Obsidian Dragon
MacbookPro14,3 - Intel Core i7 3.1 GHz, 16 GB
MacOS 13.6.6 running Protools 2024.3.1

Mac Studio M1Max - 64GB
MacOS 14.4.1 running Protools 2024.3.1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2007, 08:34 AM
darthpony darthpony is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jozi, South Africa
Posts: 3
Default Re: Mbox and Firewire vs USB transfer rate.

Quote:
The question was more about firewire vs. USB2.0 for the audio interface.
That's what I meant yeah, sorry if it wasn't clear.

So, if the Mbox 2 uses a USB connection, it would in theory be the same as using the Pro or 003 running on Firewire.. Right?

Am I understanding correctly?

S
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2007, 08:51 AM
MarkGenero MarkGenero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Natick, MA, US
Posts: 157
Default a note about the MBOX2 factory...

I have the MBOX2 factory and the digi website speces say it uses USB 1.1, not USB 2.0. I don't know the exact difference, but I believe 1.1 is signicantly slower than 2.0

That said, the latency is not all that bad. My biggest problem is the headphone volume with the mbox series. I was used to the robust headphone amp of the 001. The mbox headphone amps give a barely adequate volume.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question about transfer rate montelee Storage Subsystems 3 08-13-2008 12:44 AM
transfer at wrong sample rate from ADAT Slideman Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 6 10-23-2002 05:44 AM
hard drives transfer rate speedyk5 Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 1 03-23-2001 11:22 AM
transfer rate of 66Mbytes/sec enough? jef 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 1 12-01-2000 04:09 PM
[Q] DiskI/O data transfer rate in finder Gakuji Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 10-21-1999 01:26 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com