Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2002, 01:45 PM
Slim Shady Slim Shady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,527
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

Wow, this topic has been coming up a lot lately - what's the deal?

There shouldn't be any noticable difference when you rip a track from a CD if you're using a good drive. I have noticed some pops and clicks from my internal DVD-RAM drive, but have never had any problems with my external firewire 40x read CD Burner. Plus, you save a heck of a lot of time over bringing in the song in real time (if you do it as often as i do), and, if your external S/PDIF drive doesn't have a stable clock, you could actually lose some quality that way.

Just my opinion, but I've never encountered any problems ripping audio off of CDs.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2002, 02:31 PM
Bunting Ho Bunting Ho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 153
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

Thanks Slim,
I can't say that I've noticed any degradation either, no pops clicks etc; I suppose what I was asking was whether the process itself adds or subtracts in any way, such that noise, or artefacts may accumulate over time, through repeated transfers. I have seen on this forum that even bouncing to disc can degrade the sound quality a bit; I personally can never hear any difference.....
Cheers
__________________
J
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2002, 02:38 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

I would tend to think that ripping with "Audio Extractor" is better quality since there can't be any sync problems, no jitter, nothing...
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2002, 02:43 PM
Bunting Ho Bunting Ho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 153
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

Thanks Kickin',
That's a very good point........quality might even be improved!
Cheers [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
J
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2002, 03:04 PM
Bastiaan Bastiaan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nederland
Posts: 6,916
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

IF you get any pops/clicks.....try extracting at a lower speed....i am on a pc and i have to switch down....
__________________
What's that?
- That's the machine that goes "pling".


Bastiaan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2002, 03:23 PM
John H John H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Northwest England
Posts: 809
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

In my experience ripping from my Yamaha CD writer is a lot faster and less prone to gitches than ripping from the internal CD Rom on my beige G3.

My HiFi has an SP/DIF connector too so I could rip that way if it really was a problem. The only CDs that seem to cause problems ripping are the Mixed Mode Cds with a data partition on the last track, you need to use an MP3 encoder to to rip the tracks (as .AIFF not MP3 obviously) rather than just selecting them as files the way you would with a normal CD.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2002, 07:49 PM
Chompers Chompers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Springfield
Posts: 1,860
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

its a file. You are just extracting a file. The real time method is one I intend to never investigate.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2002, 09:25 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR> its a file. You are just extracting a file. The real time method is one I intend to never investigate. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Well, that's exactly why it's easier to just extract the file using audio extractor, than to rerecord a synched up spdif stream of 0 and 1!!!!
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-19-2002, 12:32 AM
Bunting Ho Bunting Ho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 153
Default Ripping vs real time quality

Does anybody know whether the quality of audio suffers when a track is ripped, say using Toast Extractor to convert a track from a CD to an SD11 file, as compared with running it in real time via SPdif?
Thanks
[img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
__________________
J
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-19-2002, 01:09 AM
Chompers Chompers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Springfield
Posts: 1,860
Default Re: Ripping vs real time quality

Yeah Kikn, thats right.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clip Gain won’t update in real time during playback on Elastic Time tracks yanos macOS 0 06-03-2012 03:48 PM
Real-Time Bounce to Disk...REAL PAIN Brian in Charlotte 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 201 07-26-2010 08:12 AM
Structure Real Time Time Stretch FedericoF Virtual Instruments 3 02-18-2010 05:30 PM
DIGI FEEDBACK: 'Real Time' Bounces-Time Effective? csiking 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 04-20-2005 06:41 PM
Time before real-time edits take place? Captain_Pants 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 8 09-19-2002 05:23 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com