Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools | MTRX & MTRX Studio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-02-2016, 09:09 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
But they are MADI and word clock connectors on a DX32. So the question remains....
Loopsync is just WC x256 (aka super clock), and since it has the Digilinks and the box is HD compatible, it stands to reason that those BNCs are used for Loopsync. But hopefully a current DAD x32 user will chime in.
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-02-2016, 09:45 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,898
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

LoopSync is 1x WC
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:08 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
LoopSync is 1x WC
Just did some digging, and it seems that when a Sync I/O is connected it outputs super clock? IOW, HD rigs use 1x WC, like you mentioned, but 256x super clock when a Sync box is hooked up. I assumed Loopsync was Digi taking WC and "upsampling it".
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:20 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,898
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Mazurek View Post
Just did some digging, and it seems that when a Sync I/O is connected it outputs super clock? IOW, HD rigs use 1x WC, like you mentioned, but 256x super clock when a Sync box is hooked up. I assumed Loopsync was Digi taking WC and "upsampling it".
Output is 256x when you interface with legacy MIX hardware. If you don't have legacy hardware in the chain, loop sync is 1x and can be used as such whether you needed to connect to other interfaces or not. (say, you have one interface only and want to share the word clock to multiple boxes. loop sync is one valid source, you don't necessarily need external master clock)
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:26 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

based on this page and diagrams, it appears to NOT use Loop Sync.

http://www.digitalaudio.dk/page1216.aspx
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:47 AM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,636
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Output is 256x when you interface with legacy MIX hardware. If you don't have legacy hardware in the chain, loop sync is 1x and can be used as such whether you needed to connect to other interfaces or not. (say, you have one interface only and want to share the word clock to multiple boxes. loop sync is one valid source, you don't necessarily need external master clock)
I think this is correct its 1x now. The old 888 you had 256x super clock for slave clock. From an engineering viewpoint 1x seems just easy to do. I'm not sure why super clock was ever a thing. OK with old converters and electronics maybe 256x made sense to drive the converter sample clock directly, but with modern electronics you might as well reconstruct that locally. And get better phase noise etc. on the reconstructed clock.

Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 10-02-2016 at 11:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:49 AM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,636
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Mazurek View Post
based on this page and diagrams, it appears to NOT use Loop Sync.

http://www.digitalaudio.dk/page1216.aspx
Right, so we are back, again, to the original question asked at the head of this thread.

Not having loop sync is going to be a pain for some customers with existing HD rigs, its a great question for Avid to clarify.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-02-2016, 02:18 PM
LukeHoward LukeHoward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,237
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
Right, so we are back, again, to the original question asked at the head of this thread.

Not having loop sync is going to be a pain for some customers with existing HD rigs, its a great question for Avid to clarify.

Correct, and that is why I asked it ;-)
__________________
https://lukehoward.com/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-02-2016, 06:33 PM
LukeHoward LukeHoward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,237
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

FWIW Sweetwater has some pricing here:

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/MTRX
__________________
https://lukehoward.com/
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-02-2016, 08:18 PM
rcutz rcutz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 206
Default Re: Pro Tools MTRX

Hi Guess it was not necessary to use loop sync with this unit.

I have the DAD AX32. I`m using it with one digilink port connect to my
computer, and my PT SOFT "see`s" a MADI Interface with 64 I/O. I guess If I connect the other port of my HD NATIVE to the second digilink port, It will see another MADI I/O or AVID I/O and will "resolve" all the clock issues internally...
but I only guess.

What I also already did was to connect two different pro tools machines, i.e. two different computers, one to each digilink port and it work seamlessly, like plug and play and I was able to send signal from one to another, and to monitor the sum in about 5 minutes of setup...

I did the same using digilink and dante. Also route signals using the AES built int ports... the AX32 was really amazing and I thinks it really sounds good.

I also check the sweetwater link and notice that it seems that the Avid MTRX unit will not be selling with default DA cards...

I pay around USD 5K to my DAD wich inclued all the base configurations (16 channels of AES I/O, one coaxial MADI I/O pair, two mini DigiLink ports,) + PRO|MON license (to use it as monitor box with S6) and a DA card with 8 outputs.
The basic version at the time (3 or 4 months ago) was about USD3K without any AD/DA card and without the PRO|MON license.

It seems that te MTRX will come with the monitor license as default. At the time of my purchase - need to run 2 pro tools together, it was a easy decision. I spent just 5K to have 8 pristine outputs, a nice monitor box, summing box, routing matrix, and was able to route more then 32 channels between 2 pro tools using only digilink cables or DANTE.
If I try to do that with classic AVID I/O I would spent around 9K just to wire up 2 AVID MADI I/O.
__________________
Ricardo Cutz
Re-recording mixer/sound editor supervisor.
Http://106db.com.br
-----
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com