Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Windows

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2020, 10:07 PM
GrievousAngel GrievousAngel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Statesboro, USA
Posts: 80
Default Meeting performance expectations based its cost!

I feel my computer system is not meeting performance expectations based its cost! I'm running PT12 updated to the latest 2020 version on an updated Windows 10 Pro 64-bit platform.

System build:
Motherboard
ASUS. X99-DELUXE II (SOCKET 2011)
CPU
Intel Core i7 5820K @ 3.30GHz (OC ~3.8GHz)
Haswell-E/EP 22nm Technology
Ram
64GB @ 1223 MHz (16-18-18-35) 4 (12Gb x 4) of 8 slots occupied. ~15% memory used.
Graphics
LG ULTRAWIDE CURVED DISPLAY (3440x1440@60Hz)
GIGABYTE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 4Gb Memory
Storage
Boot (C): Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB (M2.2)
User Data (D): Samsung SSD 960 EVO 250GB (M2.2)
DAW Sessions/Music (M): Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB (M2.2)
Samples (S): Corsair Force SSD MP500 500GB (M2.2)
Projects (P): 1TB Seagate Firecuda (SATAIII)
System Backup (Z): 4TB TOSHIBA HDWE140 (SATAIII)
Optical Drive: LG HL-DT-ST DVDRAM
Audio
System: Realtek High Definition Audio
Master Converter: RME ADI-2 Pro FS (MADIFace)
*Session Converter: UA Apollo X8P (TB3 upgrade soon)

Any suggestions how to evaluate a Windows system in a Pro Tools setup similar to this?

Suggestions on upgrading to Thunderbolt 3. I understand the X99 is not compatible with (or easily converted to) TB3 drivers, i.e., like X299 for example.

Upgrade suggestions (MOBO and CPU) if TB3 is the driving force? I’ve always used ASUS MOBO but I know Gigabyte and ASRock MOBO are popular as well.

Best,

Billy
__________________
GrievousAngel
Statesboro, USA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2020, 06:13 AM
junkgear's Avatar
junkgear junkgear is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,292
Default Re: Meeting performance expectations based its cost!

I would take a look through the PC Build Thread to get some idea of what combinations are working for people.

As far as how much computer you need really depends on the size of your sessions, number of plug-ins/VIs and the complexity of the session. It also depends on which plug-ins you use as some take up a lot more resources than others.

For Thunderbolt, I would look for a board that already has it built it. The add in cards seem to cause some issues for people, and there are more boards out there now that already come with TB3.

Before going TB3 though, check with the manufacturer of the interface you will be using. Most interfaces these days still need a TB3 to TB2 adapter and they can tell you which one works best with their hardware.
__________________
Will K

System Details
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Expectations for 11/11/11 blewis Eleven Rack 57 11-11-2011 10:32 AM
What CPU/Processor has best performance for its cost? TheArch 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 02-08-2010 12:56 AM
Converting Sampled based Tracks to Tick Based NYKeys Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) 2 05-14-2009 05:48 PM
changing audio files from tick based to sample based? levelaudio 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 01-10-2009 11:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com