|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
I've been working with Cubase on a PC for many years. Now I'm going to switch to Mac Pro and Pro Tools 9. After reading some posts on this forum I'm a bit concerned about the performance of software instruments. Some people are saying that RTAS is "pretty dreadful when it comes to virtual instruments".
I definitely want to find out more about this before I run into serious problems. What is your experience with software instruments in PT9 or PT HD? Would you say that these problems are more PC-related and less pronounced on Mac? Do you think it would be worth getting Logic for Midi-based projects? Here are some of the virtual instruments I use the most: NI Kontakt, NI Battery, NI FM8, Korg Legacy Collection, Ivory Grand Piano, GForce M-Tron |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
I use Spectrasonics Omnishpere & Trilian and they tend to lock PT9 up pretty easily.
Therefore I rewire Reaper into ProTools for VI's and since Reaper is 64Bit, it allows access to the full 12GB of RAM in my system. Unfortunately PT9 is still not 64Bit so only provides access to about 4GB.
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz) Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples) 1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro) GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4 PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim CASE: Fractal Define XL R2 PT 11HD (v11.3.2) Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII HD 96I/O |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
VI performance is even worse on OSX than on Windows. If you want to know the details I suggest that you look at some of the figures on www.dawbench.com and be prepared to be shocked.
The best way round all of this is either to use rewire or Vienna Ensemble. D
__________________
ProTools 9.02 2 x Intel Xeon x5675 3.07GHz Hex Core 48GB RAM Windows 7 (x64)Pro RME Multiface II Intensity ATI HD5400 series graphics card |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
Isn't the 64bit (beta) version of Reaper not yet rewire-able?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
This comes pretty unexpected for me...I was assuming Pro Tools was on a par with Cubase and Logic in terms of midi and virtual instruments.
I guess I'll have to look into this rewire and Reaper stuff. I have heard of it but it's new territory for me. Can anyone share their experiences with Native Instruments VIs in Pro Tools? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
Quote:
Can it be that on a Mac Pro with Pro Tools 9 I can't even use one (1!!) instance of Kontakt at a buffer setting of 64 samples??? This is unbelievable. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
Generally speaking, Protools is not as efficient with VI's as other DAW's. If you compare on the exact same computer with the same specs, you'll find that other DAW's can run more instances and more efficiently. This mainly has to do with Protools RTAS plugin format vs. AU or VST. And the fact that Protools is still a 32 bit program (this same comparison discrepancy was still the case even when the other programs were still 32 bit).
It's an issue that Avid has been working on, and at some point we will see a new and improved RTAS format, but for now, as mentioned, there are solutions to use as a workaround. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
Quote:
D
__________________
ProTools 9.02 2 x Intel Xeon x5675 3.07GHz Hex Core 48GB RAM Windows 7 (x64)Pro RME Multiface II Intensity ATI HD5400 series graphics card |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
Use the 32 bit version of Reaper for 32 bit Pro Tools. Works like a charm... . Reaper 32 bit bridges 64 bit plugins beautifully, thus making the whole ReWire, more RAM concept work with PT.
Quote:
Check out the videos in my signature for setting up Reaper ReWire with Pro Tools. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Software instrument performance in Pro Tools 9
I have Cubase, Nuendo, Sonar and PTLE 8 on an i7 PC running XP. I just bought the new entry level Imac (w/thunderbolt) and I will upgrade to PT 9. I needed the MAC compatibility as well as the future of thunderbolt. However, the PC will still be my production rig. PT has never ran as smoothly as Cubase for that. Pro tools will be used to edit and mix.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument track plugin performance issue? | ef2000 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 08-16-2010 05:41 PM |
MIDI and Virtual Instrument Performance? | Tbassist4 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 09-07-2008 06:10 PM |
help! abysmal RTAS/virtual instrument performance on my MBP | SamuelLJackson | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 05-08-2008 11:07 PM |
RTAS instrument performance G5 vs Intel Mac ? | ZRO1 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 03-12-2007 12:21 PM |
Live performance software? | bluerockgod | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 03-18-2005 02:32 AM |