|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Howdy fellow Pro Tools Users,
First of all, I'm really glad to have gotten here: this community seems to be great opportunity to keep in touch with other Pro Tools users and share invaluable information / experiences. I for my part haven't been much of a forum person so far but I really like how topics trend to progress around here, unlike GS. Anyways, my remark, especially from my point of view, being a Logic long time user, is that PT 10's performance on Q-Clone is tremendous. I'm running on a dual quad core 2.8 GHz 3.1 mac pro and sessions can be literally stuffed with it. Whereas in Logic 9, couple of stacked Q-Clone channels spank my CPU like nobody's business. Does PT have really such a better optimization for this Plugin / Waves Plugins in general? Because I'm beyond excited and shocked how good Pro Tools performs, granted that I'm still on the older version 10 (I do have 11 too but can't use it unless I shift gears to Mavericks. What is your take on the whole matter? Have you experienced the same thing? Please let me know, I'm really curious to find out. Mike |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
11 does not require mavericks.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346 Interview Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Yeah but I'm still on Snow Leopard since Lion was sloppy as hell.
I'd really love to upgrade to Mavericks but I don't know how well my Mac's gonna perform compared to Snow Leopard. Given how good the new Avid Audio Engine runs, supposedly even much better in PT11, I cannot wait to make the transition. Because when you move forward, you might as well go all the way and make the leap. If I don't really benefit from the transition a whole, I'd rather stick with SL and try to make the best out of it, which is PT10. Still, I'd love to hear someone's opinion on my Q-clone experience. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Quote:
An idea... Clone your boot drive with carbon copy cloner and try mountain lion or mavericks. If its not working well go back to your old cloned snow leopard. I haven't gone to mavericks, running PT11 (10 too but haven't used it in months) very well on 10.8.5 so no reason to. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Quote:
hoe this helps. Cheers! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Quote:
What system are you running PT on if I may ask? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q-Clone performance best in PT?
Quote:
I will upgrade for a HDX system on a 8 core 5.1 Mac pro in a couple of months, so i hope Qclone will be as fine or better on 11 than it is on my system. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help me with Q-Clone | Chris Doremus | Tips & Tricks | 3 | 09-24-2008 05:58 AM |
Mac clone $399 | BAJ | General Discussion | 4 | 04-25-2008 09:59 AM |
Q-Clone | tec | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 09-15-2005 06:34 PM |
How do you clone a CD? | TIMOTHY | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 17 | 04-28-2001 06:53 PM |
DA-88 to PT via O2R = clone? | mtung | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 01-05-2000 12:43 AM |