|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
As one who upgraded to 12HD, I thought about PT Vanilla at first. But there are HD-only features, be it not sexy, that are essential to my workflow. Like advanced automation. I felt those non sexy HD only features I need were worth the tax deductible $32.50/month (399/yr).
If you feel that there is no major difference between HD and vanilla and the HD yearly fee is not worth it, maybe dropping down to Vanilla is a move worth considering. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Their reasoning is simple -
HD Native and HDX won't work without it. Always been this way - still is. SW features have no relevance now (though in the past they correlated better - as in non-HD had less - even much less a long time ago)...
__________________
2017 27" iMac 3.8GHz i5, 1TB SSD Logic ProX, Studio One V4, PT current version, Apogee Ensemble TB Musician: http://www.ivanlee.net/ Design Engineer: http://www.propowerinc.com/resume.html |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Quote:
Of course they removed this from HD users in 9, when they put all the core audio stuff in… but it’s another example of dedicated HD users getting a raw deal. What will they take next??? |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Quote:
G |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
I don't need a second license. I just want the price to come down since it is artificially high and I want features. I'm having a tough time selling my HD license because everybody had realized it is a pointless license compared to vanilla now.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Not if you need to run HD hardware, do surround, or use a control surface. You just need to find the right user to buy your asset. Contact a post facility or commercial music studio, many are in the market for "extra" systems.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
For Cheap.
__________________
Retro 176 (pair), Pultec EQP-1A (pair), Germanium Comps (pair), BAE 10DC (pair), Distressor (pair), Manley Vari-Mu, Sta-Level, Zener, SSL Fusion, SSL FX G384, API 2500, LA2A, 1176, Bricasti, Massive Passive, Anamod ATS-1, Eventide H3500, TC 2290, Yamaha D5000, PCM92, PCM70... Amps, Amps & More Amps. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Maybe Avid will have the Christmas spirit and give us a present since we've been good, buying their expensive hardware and a more expensive software, for goodness sake!
I'll even leave a glass of milk and warm cookies out for 'em.
__________________
PT Ultimate 2024.3 PT HDX MacPro 7,1 (Intel) 16 Core 96 GB ram macOS Ventura 13.4 Somehow, musicians are now technicians! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Isn't Trim still missing in Pro Tools Vanilla?
Trim is a feature I could not live without.
__________________
recording.guru : FREE Pro Tools Tips and 19 Video Basic Training Course Pro Tools HDX 2023.9 Mac Pro 7,1 3.2 GHz 16-Core Xeon W 160 GB RAM macOS 11.7.4 Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners
Yes, all the "advanced automation features" are still HD only. Preview, Capture, Snapshots.... etc
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying a used Control 24. Is it still a good idea? Owners or ex-owners please help! | Intini | ICON & C|24 | 19 | 01-01-2009 10:57 AM |
Does This seem expensive to you? | funeral | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 02-20-2007 10:17 AM |
Least Expensive was to get into TDM | PhatBit | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 22 | 06-03-2005 02:41 AM |
Some times there is a waveform when recording and other times not ? | duderonomi | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 04-04-2003 10:17 PM |
Which is more expensive? | Sudsy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 12-10-2001 10:52 PM |