Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > General Discussion & Off Topic > General Discussion
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2002, 11:04 AM
evan harmon evan harmon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 35
Default unbalanced vs. balanced question: 8*Bus + 888\'s

I'm moving up to Mix and getting two 888|24's for use with a used mackie 8*bus.

I'd like to use aux sends as the inputs to my 888's as their freely assignable - however some of the aux send outputs on the 8*bus are unbalanced.

The 888 inputs are balanced though... is it a bad idea to plug a balanced cable into the unbalanced aux sends?

This seems like a newbie question, yet i couldnt find an answer to it searching this forum, nor mackie's online forum.

Any help would be much appreciated! [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

-Evan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2002, 01:14 PM
mdvirtual mdvirtual is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: South Florida
Posts: 145
Default Re: unbalanced vs. balanced question: 8*Bus + 888\'s

Evan,

I'd recommend using the 8 busses for one 888/24 and 8 of the direct outs for the other, running everything balanced. With this scenario you'll have 8 Pro Tools inputs that can be freely assigned and the other 8 fixed.

Another thought is to run all the 888/24 inputs to a TRS patchbay mounted above the console, and use the Mackie's jack field as a patchbay, in which case every input would be freely patchable.

With only 6 sends it really isn't practical to use them to feed Pro Tools. You also risk a lot of routing confusion/mistakes if you aren't religious about zeroing your console.
__________________
Michael Damon
Composer/Sound Designer
Virtual Productions

PT Ultimate, i9-9900k, 64GB RAM, Gigabyte Aorus Ultra MB, Sapphire Radeon RX580, Windows 10 Pro, Fireface UFX
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2002, 04:00 PM
Michael Ellis Michael Ellis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 30
Default Re: unbalanced vs. balanced question: 8*Bus + 888\'s

Quote:
Originally posted by evan harmon:
The 888 inputs are balanced though... is it a bad idea to plug a balanced cable into the unbalanced aux sends?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">I totally agree with Mr. Damon, it doesn't make much sense to use your sends to get signal to the 888s. His suggestion is very smart.

To answer your question, though, if you customise your cables to be balanced/unbalanced, you could do it. It's something very common for connecting older processing units. You just need to make sure that the unbalanced end of the cable has the cold wire soldered to the ground wire at the post (ring to sleeve, in a typical TRS cable).

Cheers, and good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2002, 06:23 AM
Ben Jenssen's Avatar
Ben Jenssen Ben Jenssen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oslo
Posts: 5,260
Default Re: unbalanced vs. balanced question: 8*Bus + 888\'s

I use a berhinger 8-bus this way. It works very nicely. I take external pre amps and feed them balanced into "line" on the mixer channels. I disable EQ on them. And balanced from group outs and bal. into 001.
Remember that you can return a recording signal to headphones directly from the Mackie and have no latency in HP, just remember to pull down the fader on the recording PT track.
__________________
Mac mini M2 16GB RAM macOS 13.4.1. PT Studio 2023.6.
Topping E30 II DAC, Dynaudio BM6, 2 x Artist Mix, SSL UC1, Control on iPad.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2002, 06:48 AM
evan harmon evan harmon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 35
Default Re: unbalanced vs. balanced question: 8*Bus + 888\'s

thanks for the replies everyone!

I also read the submaster part in the manual wrong - i was thinking they were outputs - totally missed the insert part.

The submaster inserts are unbalanced - so I'm going to get a patchbay. Anyone have any recommendations? I'm guessing I need one that accepts the balanced to my 888, and the unbalanced patched out to my 8*bus.

Any patchbay brand recommendations?

-Evan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quick question about balanced v unbalanced cables Dark N Dubby 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 06-22-2010 07:36 PM
Unbalanced to Balanced question dividedsci 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 03-25-2007 08:02 PM
Balanced and Unbalanced Fishman1 General Discussion 2 09-25-2005 11:27 AM
Dumb Question: Balanced or Unbalanced?? Punx 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 06-06-2005 09:41 AM
mic preamp balanced/unbalanced question n.mathis 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 1 02-28-2002 12:49 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com