When will we get full ARA support?

[JFreak]

Expect anything except roadmap. Make feature requests and post about essential things to your workflow. Avid however releases when they are ready to release.

[dez811]

Originally Posted by grammymixer

Yep... Avid answering questions nobody is asking.


Me: Avid, Can I import an m4a from this decade to reference a mix?

Avid: No. But you can import SDII files to reference a mix from 20 years ago!

Literally nobody: Thanks Avid.

[Oggy]

Originally Posted by JFreak

Expect anything except roadmap. Make feature requests and post about essential things to your workflow. Avid however releases when they are ready to release.

Not all of Avid is bad, in my opinion. Eddies Eucon department should be the rolemodel for PT department.

[noiseboyuk]

Originally Posted by Oggy

Not all of Avid is bad, in my opinion. Eddies Eucon department should be the rolemodel for PT department.

Amen. He does make everyone else look bad, frankly.

[SomeOtherGuy]

Remember a few years back when Avid published an extensive roadmap with dates of all the areas they were going to update? It wasn't feature-specific but it at least gave us a sense of their direction.

I'd say do that again Avid.

[Southsidemusic]

Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy

Remember a few years back when Avid published an extensive roadmap with dates of all the areas they were going to update? It wasn't feature-specific but it at least gave us a sense of their direction.

I'd say do that again Avid.

Hear hear!

And let’s not forget that Jeffro does a LOT for us members aswell. Jeffro and Eddie makes Avid look good and they should be running the joint! IMHO of course

[SomeOtherGuy]

Originally Posted by Southsidemusic

Hear hear!

And let’s not forget that Jeffro does a LOT for us members aswell. Jeffro and Eddie makes Avid look good and they should be running the joint! IMHO of course

I concur!

[Mark Ziebarth]

Originally Posted by JFreak

We would not know. Anyone who knows is not talking and anyone who talks is not knowing. Avid must have learnt their lesson of pre-announcing voice upgrade of HDX and still not having delivered. Expect no roadmap.

This voice thing is everywhere: HDX fails to concur with HDN so far and with 2020.9 users of Pro Tools standard get half the voices they had before. Think about it, Avid!

[lae777]

It's all relative isn't it?
I couldn't care less about ARA implementation, or MIDI improvements.
I would like to see a comprehensive overhaul of the markers though (multiple marker lanes, color coding etc.).
I would also like to see more bug fixes, and improvements in stability, with the current feature set.
I'm happy about improvements to 'import session data', and atmos workflows, but I don't care about folder tracks (or folders in the clip list, since I've developed plenty of workarounds over the last 20 plus years).
Avid will never be able to keep all users happy.

[Sardi]

Originally Posted by lae777

It's all relative isn't it?
I couldn't care less about ARA implementation, or MIDI improvements.
I would like to see a comprehensive overhaul of the markers though (multiple marker lanes, color coding etc.).
I would also like to see more bug fixes, and improvements in stability, with the current feature set.
I'm happy about improvements to 'import session data', and atmos workflows, but I don't care about folder tracks (or folders in the clip list, since I've developed plenty of workarounds over the last 20 plus years).
Avid will never be able to keep all users happy.

You’re right. Everyone has different needs and wants and it’s hard for them to make all users happy.

But currently, one could argue that they’re keeping no one happy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk