Pro Tools 9 Hardware Insert Delay Compensation with Lynx AES16e and Aurora 16

[SolutionRoom]

If anyone is interested, I was able able to run the tests and determine the round trip latency of Pro Tools 9 with the AES16e card and an Aurora 16. Here are my results.

If anyone might have anything to add, or refute, please let me know. I am certainly no scientist or math major. Otherwise, I will be plugging these numbers into the Hardware Insert Delay settings of the IO section to compensate appropriately for the delay incurred by the Lynx hardware when using external Hardware Effects (Hardware Inserts).

At 44.1k - 29 Samples - 0.66ms

At 48k - 29 Samples - 0.60ms

At 88.2k - 22 Samples - 0.25ms

At 96k - 22 Samples - 0.23ms

* These figures were computed by following the instructions in the Pro Tools User Guide (Page 963)

* The number of Samples divided by the Sample Rate = Milliseconds

Example: At 44.1k - 29 Samples divided by 44.1 = .66ms