|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
Is it correct that the DVerb mono and DVerb 1in 2out will not share a DSP?
If that is the case is there any chance of an update? Or is there finally another good reverb for the S3L-X that is low on DSP? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
By design most reverb plugins use a hefty amount of onboard memory, and subsequently can't share most of the time.
This unfortunately also means that an instance of stereo, 1 in - 2 out and an instance of mono are considered different plugin types. Almost all reverb plugins will be pretty heavy on DSP, but if you're going to go heavy, I would highly recommend checking out the sonnox verb, that thing is ridiculously tasty. I know that's not the solution you were hoping for, so as I continue to pursue heavily getting developers onto the live sound platform, I will absolutely keep that in mind. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
Yeah, not 100% what I was looking for, because you can run so many instances of dverb I have it patched to some Chanel's and I only need one extra as send/return. It is a big waste of DSP putting one dverb on one....
But maybe we will get the other DSP for us to use? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
Im hoping so! But also don't forget 96k without dropping channel count would require more DSP processing also!
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
I Really don't care about 96k I hope it will be an option and not a fixed feature.
I would rather go for more busses and more DSP for FX |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
I am with Karel on this. Rather busses or fx. Or best, a choice between them.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
I totally understand that, I also understand customers wanting to run shared io between S3L and S6L which would mean matching sample rate between the two systems.
Both are totally valid, and important workflows, and I would love to support both. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: D-Verb Mono and 1in2 not sharing DSP on s3l-x?
Reading between the lines, I think I got my answer there ;-)
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
making mono track into stereo or double mono in PT7LE | VeganMuso | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 9 | 02-02-2012 05:36 AM |
A question about mono/stereo plug ins on mono tracks. | rockguitarist1255 | Pro Tools 10 | 2 | 12-24-2011 07:33 PM |
one mono audio file when two mono tracks recorded | bluerej | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 0 | 02-06-2010 01:09 AM |
Need a killer vocal verb setting for D-Verb | tmoc-rocks | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 02-21-2005 08:51 AM |
Stereo vs. Mono D-Verb | John Link | General Discussion | 3 | 05-29-2002 05:53 AM |