Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 11
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:13 AM
Holly73 Holly73 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ulm, Germany
Posts: 522
Default PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Coming from PT9 I yesterday installed the PT11 demo (and also the bundled 10 for comparison).

I was looking forward to try it, as PT9 was less than stellar when it comes to performance and stability compared to competitor's products on the same machine. But now, after the complete rewrite and kicking the legacy code everything should be...

Started a new session, created 3 stereo instrument tracks and put there Boom, Vacuum and Xpand2. Recorded 4 bars on each track and bam... got a pop-up window telling me "(-9173) Running out of CPU power. Try removing some native plugins".

At this point, the CPU meter was somewhere around 12%.

After a while, the next error hit me. This time "(-6101) CPU-Overload. Increase HW buffer size or try to remove some plugins". It was still the same session, but with an added ChannelStrip and a delay. CPU still around 13% or so.

But this message made me wonder. Wasn't the HW buffer settings supposed to be just the input buffer and playback buffers should be handled by PT independently?

I decided to take a look to the PT11 Reference Guide (page 50):
Higher Hardware Buffer Size settings are useful for sessions that are using more Native plug-ins for playback. These settings allow for more audio processing. They can also be useful to reduce errors on machines that require a higher buffer size.

How was this again with the independent buffer sizes?

I also tried to run the PT10 demo song. Was a hit and miss in PT11 (same errors as mentioned above), while it was running perfect on PT10 at a buffer of 512, 7 Processors, 95%.

My system for this test: iMac i7 2.8, OS X 10.8.4, not optimized for PT (as it isn't my main rig). But other DAWs smoke on this computer and I was hoping for PT 11 to be finally up there with the competitors, but it doesn't seem to be the case. It uses a few % less CPU, but is generally the same picky like my PT9. It also still ignores the "ignore errors" setting in the playback engine dialog.


And some more (but minor) problems:
  • Like other users, I get the "allow incoming network connections" popup
  • I can't open the help (Reference Guide etc) from within PT
  • The German translation is horrible and makes it nearly impossible to find things. Needs an option to switch to English without using scripts or switching the whole OS.


Conclusion: not impressed! And the answer to "how much is epic?" seems to be: 2
__________________
 MBPr 15" (Mid 2015) i7, PT12.4, Studio One 3, UA Apollo Quad Firewire
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:43 AM
Carl Kolchak Carl Kolchak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,201
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Were you running your session on the system hard drive?

Is it 7200rpm or 5400rpm?

Quite often it seems that "CPU power" pop ups are more directly caused by not using a dedicated audio drive, to run your sessions off.

That said, you did mention that you haven't optimised your computer at all, and I don't believe OS X 10.8.4 is officially supported of Pro Tools at the moment (it may work???).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:57 AM
Meads Meads is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,902
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly73 View Post
  • The German translation is horrible and makes it nearly impossible to find things. Needs an option to switch to English without using scripts or switching the whole OS.
I guess this won't be possible without a script. They didn't let you change language in 10. Same now. So I guess it's always going to be like that.

But there's a simple solution:
http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=340183

This worked perfectly fine for me with 10, and same now with 11. No big deal.
__________________

iMac Pro
- MacOS 10.14.6
---
- Pro Tools U HDN 2019.6
- Avid HD Omni + HD I/O 8x8x8
- C|24 | S3 | Dock
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:59 AM
Holly73 Holly73 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ulm, Germany
Posts: 522
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Kolchak View Post
Were you running your session on the system hard drive?
Yes, it was the iMac's 7200rpm system drive. My dedicated workstation has an audio drive, but I need to record with it tomorrow and therefor only tried it on my iMac.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Kolchak View Post
Quite often it seems that "CPU power" pop ups are more directly caused by not using a dedicated audio drive, to run your sessions off.
I know, but first of all, there was no audio involved in the VI test and the PT10 demo with more than 30 tracks played back very well on PT10 from the same system drive. I thought they already improved the disk engine (or whatever it was called) in PT10. And the disk meter was at 0 during the VI test and around 20% with the PT10 demo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Kolchak View Post
That said, you did mention that you haven't optimised your computer at all, and I don't believe OS X 10.8.4 is officially supported of Pro Tools at the moment (it may work???).
I installed Mountain Lion in order to use PT and all I got was 10.8.4. And I saw some here recommending 10.8.4 even though it isn't qualified yet.

I know I could do some things better in this test, but it was good enough to see that PT is still more picky than other DAWs and the improvements from 10 to 11 aren't "epic".
__________________
 MBPr 15" (Mid 2015) i7, PT12.4, Studio One 3, UA Apollo Quad Firewire
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:04 AM
Carl Kolchak Carl Kolchak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,201
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Well then I guess you have discovered the true meaning of :

"Next Level S*1t"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:06 AM
Holly73 Holly73 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ulm, Germany
Posts: 522
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

__________________
 MBPr 15" (Mid 2015) i7, PT12.4, Studio One 3, UA Apollo Quad Firewire
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:26 AM
Park Seward's Avatar
Park Seward Park Seward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 4,284
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Sorry for your problems. I get the exact opposite result on a MacPro with 10.8.4 and PT11. The demo runs fine with a high of 7% cpu usage.

Maybe something is not right with your Mac???
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2013, 11:42 AM
Holly73 Holly73 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ulm, Germany
Posts: 522
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Ok, I need to revise my opinion. I connected am external harddrive and this really seems to be the key.

Now I played the PT10 demo track still with around 12%, but no hiccups anymore. Quite responsive and smooth.

Then I played a recent recording of mine. 41 tracks, no FX until now, as it isn't mixed yet, but the CPU meter stays at 2%. Impressive!

Even better: it doesn't make a difference what the HW buffer is set to. So, maybe the advertisements of Avid have been right and the Reference Guide and the popup alerts are misleading.

The problem with the language: it can be fixed using the script Meads linked to. But still I'd prefer an onboard solution, as right now I closed PT and forgot to start it using the script, but by double-clicking the session and there it was again in all it's glory: the German GUI.
__________________
 MBPr 15" (Mid 2015) i7, PT12.4, Studio One 3, UA Apollo Quad Firewire
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-24-2013, 11:59 AM
Meads Meads is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,902
Default Re: PT11 "First test" or "how much is epic?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly73 View Post
The problem with the language: it can be fixed using the script Meads linked to. But still I'd prefer an onboard solution, as right now I closed PT and forgot to start it using the script, but by double-clicking the session and there it was again in all it's glory: the German GUI.
When I started using the script this happened to me all the time. Give it some time to settle in, using the script becomes a natural part of working with PT.
__________________

iMac Pro
- MacOS 10.14.6
---
- Pro Tools U HDN 2019.6
- Avid HD Omni + HD I/O 8x8x8
- C|24 | S3 | Dock
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does "Westmere" qualification apply to "Bloomfield" and "Gulftown" also? bashville Pro Tools 10 5 03-23-2013 03:04 PM
Pro tools 9 crashes at startup "Bus error" in thread "MainThread", at address 0x0 danball macOS 2 09-26-2011 04:49 PM
PT9 Session Troubles - "Bus Error" in "Main Thread" & Could not complete the Open... tohmit macOS 5 03-23-2011 12:13 PM
hardware buttons for "preview", "capture" and "punch" evs Post - Surround - Video 1 12-06-2010 12:28 PM
The "FATE" of CM LABS "MotorMix" & "MotorMate". Dum dum dum dum... leon777 Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 21 10-15-2002 12:00 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com