Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Tips & Tricks
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2006, 09:11 AM
therecordinghouse therecordinghouse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, IN.
Posts: 1,094
Default acceptable latency?

iyo, what is acceptable latency? i have recorded vocals, guitar, bass, keyboards with my mbox 2 at 128, and no one has said anything. i have even asked a few of my clients if they could hear any delay, not one has said yes. what are you guys setting your hardware to?
__________________
Lynn Graber
Studio and Mobile Recording, Fort Wayne, IN.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2006, 10:20 AM
spkguitar's Avatar
spkguitar spkguitar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 18,161
Default Re: acceptable latency?

I use 128 or 64 with the 002r when tracking. Never had a problem with either.

I've also used 256 at times, but I personally feel 256 is on the fringe. I notice it quite a bit at 256, while others don't.
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help

Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX

Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2006, 08:14 PM
daeron80 daeron80 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 4,106
Default Re: acceptable latency?

I have a web page about that. Gives details incuding samples and milliseconds for latency at each hardware buffer setting. Some opinions about why it's not as big a deal as some might think.

http://www.elvenminstrel.com/recordi...002latency.htm
__________________
David J. Finnamore

PT 2023.12 Ultimate | Clarett+ 8Pre | macOS 13.6.3 on a MacBook Pro M1 Max
PT 2023.12 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 latest, HP Z440 64GB
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2006, 11:17 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,911
Default Re: acceptable latency?

Quote:
I've also used 256 at times, but I personally feel 256 is on the fringe. I notice it quite a bit at 256, while others don't.
Yep, you hit it on the nail. Performing artists have used to such latencies and 256 is never a problem with live musicians. Never ever have I met a live musician that has complained about using 256 buffer; however, I have met few studio divas who were not ok with 128 setting in their opinion. (one of them that was not ok with 256 in the beginning said later that it was ok when I switched from 128 to 256 and told that I made the latency even smaller.)

It's about how much you have done it and how much you trust yourself. That said, in my experience, even most live artists tend to slower the tempo when 512 buffer has been tried, but going back to 256 has made it groove.

If you're on a big stage, you most likely don't have perfect monitoring. You will have to rely on what you see and what you expect to happen. It is not uncommon to have other band members 10-15 meters away (roughly 20ms of latency) and play in perfect sync -- it's a skill to have a metronome inside your own head instead of the monitor
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2006, 07:55 AM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Re: acceptable latency?

128. Even experienced session drummers don't notice that amount of latency. Also, I don't like switching the buffer to a higher setting for mixing. I simply track and mix at 128: pretty much a non-issue for me.
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is 003 Factory acceptable for Audio Post? studer 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 13 05-12-2010 06:45 AM
acceptable volumn problem johnmo2 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 12-15-2005 10:35 AM
A normal/acceptable amount of crashing? east3rdst 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 32 11-07-2001 09:45 AM
Unity DS-1 and Latency... Anyone else feel the latency makes the Plugin unusable? Mt.Everest Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 7 08-26-2001 04:53 PM
multiple compression layers—acceptable? dex Tips & Tricks 2 06-29-2000 12:48 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com