|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Quote:
__________________
- Intel 14900K/NzXt Kraken Elite/64GB Kingston DDR5 6000 mhz (32x2)/ Asus Pro Art Z790/Asus 4090/Win 11 Pro 23H2/UAD Apollo 8 x2 w TBolt 3 card u/g/UAD Twin X. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
And i'll also go back to.. other DAWs have zero issue even on the weakest computer in my sig, an old quad core, monitoring multiple tracks through the DAW at 32 buffer with multiple FX busses.. So.. why shouldn't PT be able to do it with equally good performance? it's a matter of coding..
__________________
- Intel 14900K/NzXt Kraken Elite/64GB Kingston DDR5 6000 mhz (32x2)/ Asus Pro Art Z790/Asus 4090/Win 11 Pro 23H2/UAD Apollo 8 x2 w TBolt 3 card u/g/UAD Twin X. |
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Also saying your converters define the "zero buffer" latency which means with crappy interface your zero buffer might be worse than good interface with bigger buffer. How hard it is to understand? Human ear is only concerned about milliseconds and has no idea where they come from
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Quote:
that means 10.66 ms and then there are core audio safety buffers, ad/da latency and also added driver latency depending on interface... You need the full RTL figure when talking about monitoring incoming tracks.. the output is what's needed for VI tracks but we have gone well beyond those now in our discussion. Look at this USB interface, 22 milliseconds at 256. Now, that was just the google hit I got from the search I did, and tascam are not known for their drivers, but for a USB interface it's not far off.. they are all loaded with safety buffers in their drivers.. https://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=174445
__________________
- Intel 14900K/NzXt Kraken Elite/64GB Kingston DDR5 6000 mhz (32x2)/ Asus Pro Art Z790/Asus 4090/Win 11 Pro 23H2/UAD Apollo 8 x2 w TBolt 3 card u/g/UAD Twin X. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Quote:
Anyway, I will copy paste my post yet again which I keep getting replies to that have nothing to do with it: "Other DAWs have zero issue even on the weakest computer in my sig, an old quad core, monitoring multiple tracks through the DAW at 32 buffer with multiple FX busses.. So.. why shouldn't PT be able to do it with equally good performance? it's a matter of coding.." BTW, Sardi and Southside music and myself are correct, you are incorrect. Simple as that. PS, guess what? PT adds safety buffers of it's OWN with core audio, so in fact, latency is even HIGHER than it is in almost all other OS X daws at the same buffer size.
__________________
- Intel 14900K/NzXt Kraken Elite/64GB Kingston DDR5 6000 mhz (32x2)/ Asus Pro Art Z790/Asus 4090/Win 11 Pro 23H2/UAD Apollo 8 x2 w TBolt 3 card u/g/UAD Twin X. |
#76
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
USB interface with 22ms roundtrip is useless for monitoring
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#77
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Just sayin' since 2002 I have had success with DigiDesign/Avid/Apogee interfaces using 256 buffering. How hard it is to understand that does not mean USB interface with 22ms roundtrip?
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#78
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
Earliest digital pianos had +10ms roundtrip and artists could use them. If someone says monitoring must be well below 5ms I must ask her what brand perfume she would prefer to get the show going on
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
This thread would be a lot easier to read without people who don’t use or understand large VI count workflows chiming in. Too much static and irrelevance.
__________________
Dave Marsden UK |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Horrible VI performance when recording in 2019.10!
LOL.. or large track counts. Cheers bud
__________________
- Intel 14900K/NzXt Kraken Elite/64GB Kingston DDR5 6000 mhz (32x2)/ Asus Pro Art Z790/Asus 4090/Win 11 Pro 23H2/UAD Apollo 8 x2 w TBolt 3 card u/g/UAD Twin X. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PT 2019 Mojave performance improvements | bartosz idzi | Pro Tools 2019 | 8 | 05-17-2019 01:10 PM |
Horrible Latency when recording in Pro Tools 11 | FJ92 | Pro Tools 11 | 4 | 04-22-2016 10:09 AM |
Recording quality suddenly horrible? PT8 - files in here. | masta1 | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 7 | 04-03-2009 10:11 AM |
Horrible noise on bass amp when recording! | idledude | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 6 | 01-07-2009 12:57 PM |
Horrible, Horrible, Skreeching Noise On Drum Track in Sampletank | William.E.Lemuel | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 10-09-2002 06:54 AM |