Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2004, 09:55 PM
surchur surchur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside Calif
Posts: 561
Default anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

I just got the mbox because I thought I was going to do that proverbial album with my laptop on a beachfront somewhere. But the latency when I am laying down the next tracks Is UNacceptable Is it really this bad or is there someway around this! I have talked to others that pretty much use it for editing and comping vocals, or not to important files.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2004, 12:03 AM
bryanbassett bryanbassett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Smyrna, FL , US
Posts: 574
Default Re: anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

Well the only solutions are
1. to set the 'input playback ' knob (2nd from the bottom) at about 12 oclock. You will hear your live input signal mixed with the latency output from the computer. You can usually record this way with moderate difficulty. If you are using the Amplitude plugin or any other such on guitar you will hear the bizarre combo of direct guitar mixed with the plugin.
2)If you are singing, playing keyboards or using an external sound source (POD , mic and amp etc.) using an external board whether it be a Mackie or a major digital board can allow you to monitor your performance without any delay(latency) at all. Overdubing though becomes an issue when you try to monitor playback then punchin in real time. You may need an extra pair of hands at the board to do this or just use the MBox, bypass the board and hope for the best. Setting the Hardware Buffer setting to its smallest amount can reduce the delay though strain the CPU and limit the amount of trks and the amount of plugins.

Hope some of this helps
BB
__________________
Macbook Pro Intel dual 2.4 OSX 10.7.5 Lion PT 9.0.6 Mbox Mini / 003R

MAC G5 PPC OSX 10.4.9 / PT 7.3 HD2 - I/O 192 /Control 24

DELL Dual Core, MBOX/003R PT 8 WIN XP
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2004, 12:30 AM
tele_player tele_player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

bryan's got it almost right. Yes, you turn the mix knob to the middle, so you hear your existing tracks AND your new overdub. But what he didn't mention is that you MUTE the track you're recording, so you don't hear it doubled (with delay) in your headphones.

Basically, if you don't need to hear plugins on the track you're recording, latency is a non-issue on the Mbox.

__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2004, 08:41 PM
bryanbassett bryanbassett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Smyrna, FL , US
Posts: 574
Default Re: anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

thanks for reminding me about the mute tele player (i'm a teleplayer myself)

what is the best way to monitor if you are using amplitube?
bryan
__________________
Macbook Pro Intel dual 2.4 OSX 10.7.5 Lion PT 9.0.6 Mbox Mini / 003R

MAC G5 PPC OSX 10.4.9 / PT 7.3 HD2 - I/O 192 /Control 24

DELL Dual Core, MBOX/003R PT 8 WIN XP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2004, 09:11 PM
tele_player tele_player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

Well, I only used an Mbox briefly, and didn't try Amplitube with it. Then I got an 002. On the 002, I just use a low buffer setting, 128 if possible.

Of course, I haven't used Amplitube in a while, I'm waiting for them to post a bugfix for the really annoying problems with the version from the original 002 bundle. It's pretty useless to me as is, worked much better in 5.3.2, if I recall correctly.

I recently got Izotope Trash, which is a really versatile amp modeler.
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2004, 09:19 PM
bryanbassett bryanbassett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Smyrna, FL , US
Posts: 574
Default Re: anywqy out of the latency problem with mbox

Yeah tele player
the `128 setting seems to be the only way ..unless you can jam without hearing the amp model. I have been monitoring half and half..so I can feel the notes with no latency but also hear a bit of the latent amp modeled sound. I use a pod alot so I have the sound on the front side. Hmmm I could also run a direct injection channel and add Amplitube after the fact opn the direct channel.
thanks
__________________
Macbook Pro Intel dual 2.4 OSX 10.7.5 Lion PT 9.0.6 Mbox Mini / 003R

MAC G5 PPC OSX 10.4.9 / PT 7.3 HD2 - I/O 192 /Control 24

DELL Dual Core, MBOX/003R PT 8 WIN XP
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency chrisdee Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Win) 34 03-30-2012 07:24 AM
My Mbox Mini suddenly has a HUGE latency problem! Dacvak 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 7 05-23-2010 02:19 PM
Digidesign Mbox 2 + spdif latency problem? alek75 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 11 04-24-2009 06:52 AM
55ms Latency Problem Mbox 2 PTLE 7.4 Cro 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 07-27-2008 09:31 PM
MBox Latency - the "164 Sample shift" problem.... Release 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 6 04-23-2004 03:30 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com