Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2004, 07:29 AM
pk_hat pk_hat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: grimy Brooklyn
Posts: 4,680
Default Q: new to TDM/HD - a bit in the dark

I've been assigned to do the research in upgrading all our stuios at work, we are a music house with 3 control rooms. One of them needs everything new from scratch, while the other 2 have TDM systems but now we're considering upgrading to HD.

I've been told to look into HD1 sets, but I noticed that at this price braket, another couple of grand gets you into HD2/Accel territory. Is the difference worth it? More importantly, is HD in general worth it?

I also noticed that crossing over to HD means buying new plugin bundles, can someone recommend some of the better ones out there? Can you run Waves in HD?

Any avice or suggestions would be great. I've been an LE user for 3 years and all this HD stuff seems a bit daunting to me, I feel like I'm at square 1 again.
__________________
www.myspace.com/krou
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:03 PM
Andy R Andy R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 333
Default Re: Q: new to TDM/HD - a bit in the dark

HD with the 192 interface sounds way better than Mix to my ears, but like people say, 'the quality of what goes into the system is more important than the system itself.', especially if you are using an external mixing board.

Plug-ins would need upgrading only, this includes waves stuff. Be aware some plug-ins did not make it to the HD platform, like lexiverb, and some didn't make it to OSX, like Soft SampleCell. OSX Samplecell conversion and RTAS/HTDM Sampler alternatives are not getting the job done as of yet. If you need Samplcell stay in OS9.

If you go with HD, I would suggest HD2, or HD core with 1 Accel card, with the 192 interface(s) at the minimum. This would give you roughly 4x the dsp of a Mix Plus, hopefully other DUC members will correct me if I'm slightly off on that multiplier. Check the specs of the 192 as there are input/output options and some rewiring may be needed because the 192 uses db25 connecters.

There is plenty of info on this site to research, and plenty of knowledgeable people on the DUC who can help you if your stuck. Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:23 PM
pk_hat pk_hat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: grimy Brooklyn
Posts: 4,680
Default Re: Q: new to TDM/HD - a bit in the dark

Thanks Andy, that's a start.

I was under the impression that Accel was only for HD2 or HD3 only, I guess you can pair it up with an HD1 too then? Here's for another simple one: I'm assuming the whole Reason/Live w/ Rewire thing works well in HD too, right?

And as far as plugins, when you're in HD, the only plugins that work have to be "HD" as well? In other words, there's no more RTAS?

Thanks, I know I'll have it figured out in no time, but the help is nice. Cheers.
__________________
www.myspace.com/krou
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2004, 07:07 PM
Andy R Andy R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 333
Default Re: Q: new to TDM/HD - a bit in the dark

pk hat - Let me clarify a bit for you. The old HD2 and 3 are now replaced by HD2 and 3 Accel. The HD core card is the same but the 'Process' cards are replaced by the 2x more powerful Accel cards.
HD systems use TDM,HTDM and RTAS plug-ins.

RTAS is still supported. As a matter of fact, Reason/Rewire comes into Pro Tools through an RTAS plug-in.

You'll be surprised to find out RTAS is somewhat limited in TDM. A record enabled RTAS plug-in mutes on playback. TDM is a decade old technology that was never designed to support very low latency plug-in performance. It's fastest hardware buffer setting is 128k, while 'native' applications are more like 32k or perhaps lower, I don't know.

Check out digidesigns product pages for more info and search the TDM DUC for specific issues. Between those two you should get up to speed in no time.-Andy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2004, 10:21 PM
tele_player tele_player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: Q: new to TDM/HD - a bit in the dark

Quote:
TDM is a decade old technology that was never designed to support very low latency plug-in performance. It's fastest hardware buffer setting is 128k, while 'native' applications are more like 32k or perhaps lower, I don't know.

I'm pretty sure you don't mean 128k and 32k above... removing the 'k' makes a lot more sense.
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM


Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dark and moody manis Post - Surround - Video 11 09-05-2008 01:55 AM
I've come over from The Dark Side! Jon Dickinson 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 18 12-11-2004 06:24 AM
002 Failing dark and quiet waxnsteel 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 1 04-05-2004 05:46 AM
What does one mean when they say a mic is dark? ixnys Tips & Tricks 12 10-22-2003 06:02 PM
.....a slot in the dark jaysun Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 1 02-08-2002 08:35 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com