|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
My guess is that they are working to make HD resources allocatable. If I were them I'd make it so you can choose where you put those resources.
That's how I'd like to see it happen. C
__________________
PT 2021.10 HDX 16x24 -Mac Pro 12 Cores 48 GB RAM OS 10.13.6 - API 16 channel - AMS Neve 16 channel, AMS-Neve-SSL -Pres/Processing, Bock Audio, BLUE Bottle, Neumann, Josephson -Mics, Bogner, Kemper- Guitar, Chandler Zener-Curve Bender Outboard/Master. UAudio, Waves, Plugin Alliance etc. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
I thought this was unbelievable a couple days ago but it looks like you might be right.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Quote:
Well, yes! And let's hope that they have the actual product ready this time and it's not a sneak peak like with folder tracks, where we had to wait at least another half year to get access to it! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
So, this was wishful thinking after all..
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
The optimist in me hopes that the additional voices are still coming -- for free, but we still need to pay for the hybrid engine. That would still be pretty great imho.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Yeah I was told about the hybrid engine coming to HDX, they have been working on it for some time now, did not see the useless music box coming first. And I'm not even sure this type of hybrid implementation is worth the wait...
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Given AVID's track record, it might take quite a while before they will actually be able to release it. Even then, I wouldn't jump on the first couple of releases, but wait a bit to be absolutely sure it is stable and working. If they're at all sure it will work with the current HDX cards. God knows what may pop up again this time.
This, and some other concerns, make me conclude that I will no longer renew my updates subscription as of current November. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PT 10 HD3 TDM voice count? | wtfil | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 08-18-2014 08:52 AM |
HD7 voice count | Raoul23 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 7 | 11-13-2011 01:08 AM |
Advantage of More DSP's for Same Voice Count? | SuperReverb | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 02-01-2009 05:56 AM |
PT HD voice count | garnoil | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 11-05-2008 07:47 PM |
Voice count for PT NT|24 Mix | Euphony Sound | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 1 | 04-21-1999 10:26 AM |