|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
haha, so let's wait until next week and see how the one and only glory avid will surprise us,....
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
Go and sin no more.
__________________
Mac Pro, Snow PT 10HD,Sequoia, Reaper W7/64, PT 9HD,Sequoia, Reaper 192 HD, HD-N, 002C BLA, BLA AGB,Autuer,Lucid, MicroCLock, Pultec, UA, Sebatron, Focusrite, Trident,API, A-Designs, Purple Audio
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
an official confirmation from russ (seems he has not signed a NDA,... )
http://www.airusersblog.com/home-pag...-official.html Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
ähem
running pro tools hd 9.0.3 perfectly on osx 10.7 pre-gold...
__________________
Selling: |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
psmworld,
Care to elaborate on how you were able to do it? I've heard with 10.7 Gold when you try to launch Pro Tools 9.03 that it states you can't run this version of Pro Tools (your Pro Tools version is 9.03) with this version of the Operating System. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
just installed osx 10.7, installed pthd 9.0.3, repaired permissions, voila
mac pro 2010 6-core
__________________
Selling: |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
Unless it's 64 bit protools, what would be the advantage. they just had an update to 10.6.8 last week. I have not even done that one. I don't see any reason to upgrade at the moment. I am sure all of the VI's I use would not run on 10.7 yet. I just have too much to risk to just jump off a cliff like that . ie. paying clients:) It's like a car, NEVER buy first generation! Good luck brave souls. G
__________________
Composer/Sound Designer/Protools 2024.3 Ultimate, MTRXII-TB3, DADMAN MOM, Cisco SG350-10MP EthernetHUB, KLANG:quelle 4 Channel Dante™Headphone Amp, DVS,MADI, Mac Studio Ultra,128 RAM/4TB SSD, Ventura 13.6.6, DP 11.3.1, Logic Pro X 10.8.1 DOLBY ATMOS Facility/MPSE Motion Picture Sound Editors Avid Certified Professional ProTools/Dolby ATMOS |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
Quote:
we can still execute Pro Tools binary directly from Terminal.app, typing ike: cd '/Applications/Digidesign/Pro Tools/Pro Tools.app/Contents/MacOS'; ./'Pro Tools' But there may be other trouble. For my case, Play immediately stopped. After executing Repair Disk Permission from Disk Utility.app, the permission of /Library/Audio/MIDI Devices was fixed, and it started to play again. It seems fine so far on Lion GM Seed as on DP4. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OSX 10.7 Lion + PT9
Quote:
whats your output of "uname -a" and "otool -L" for Pt app ? as you can see ProTools is still using Carbon Framework, and i'm wondering how you got a working carbon framework under 10.7 gm? Code:
# otool -L /Applications/Digidesign/Pro\ Tools/Pro\ Tools.app/Contents/MacOS/Pro\ Tools /Applications/Digidesign/Pro Tools/Pro Tools.app/Contents/MacOS/Pro Tools: /Users/tom/Projects/Develop/MDK/source/Integrations/ProToolsForWorkgroup/Release/libProToolsInterplayOption.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/CFnd.framework/Versions/A/CFnd (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Carbon (compatibility version 2.0.0, current version 136.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/IOKit.framework/Versions/A/IOKit (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 275.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/Versions/A/Security (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 36371.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 111.1.4) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreMIDI.framework/Versions/A/CoreMIDI (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 49.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/Pro Tools.framework/Versions/A/Pro Tools (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/DFW.framework/Versions/A/DFW (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/DigiPlatformSupport.framework/Versions/A/DigiPlatformSupport (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/DSI.framework/Versions/A/DSI (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) @executable_path/../Frameworks/FFmt.framework/Versions/A/FFmt (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current version 7.4.0) /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/CoreServices (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 32.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 476.18.0) at this point my assumption would be, that avid needs (or already has for a brand new version) to recode a lot of legacy (carbon) crap to be compatible with lion. so, that means there is either a brand new ProTools version waiting or, it is that much work to be 10.7 compatible that an update can not be expected within next year (earliest) ?!? At this time still no comment from avid, please avid -> don't pray openness ?! developing Pro Tools: as everyone may know avid lost a lot of Pro Tools core developers in the past years and since pt8 avid is doing a lot of outsourcing to the east like ukraine, czech, etc,... that was also a reason why the last update for 10.6 took that long, beside that there were problems in communication and source versioning, new avid bureaucratic guidelines to force mates not to be efficient as they like, etc... ( stuff that happen on almost every transition,... ) the only thing which kept almost the same was just the (lets say flagship/trademark) name "ProTools",... there may be benefits having a new team and at this time avid can show the world that everything is on track and there's a brand new version of protools x with a lot of new features (which are still missing at 9) ready for 10.7 ?! for everyone who is doing daily business with protools, of course -> please keep at your stable supported release, no one is forcing you to update or change anything! this topic is just for developers which are testing, and playing around with lion and of course will like to know what is all about the avids' promises,... cheers, (avid mole) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
If you're suggesting that Apple dropped support for 32-bit Carbon apps in Lion, I doubt it - think of all the applications that would break.
__________________
https://lukehoward.com/ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impossible to start Pro Tools on MacPro after downgrade Mountain Lion back to LION | DESVED | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 2 | 05-21-2013 03:18 PM |
lion -> mountain lion question | grant howarth | macOS | 3 | 05-01-2013 01:24 PM |
Lion or Mountain Lion for mid-2009 MBP with PT9 | miezurecords | macOS | 0 | 03-17-2013 12:38 AM |
Would you go from Snow Leopard to Lion (not Mountain Lion) if you could? | EricWillhelm | macOS | 9 | 01-11-2013 10:55 AM |
Macbook Pro+lion+PT9 :-( / iMac+Lion+PT9 = :-) | Pehja | macOS | 12 | 11-08-2011 01:27 PM |