|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BFD Performance???
Hi there,
I remember hearing alot of complaints about performance problems BFD had with protools. I was wondering if anybody had any info on that. Did they fix it in version 1.5 or is it still a problem to work with BFD on protools. I used Protools 7.1 on a Dual 2.5 Power Mac and a Digi002. Thank you in advance |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: BFD Performance???
I've never had performance issues with BFD. As long as you follow all of the recommendations, it runs very smoothly.
Underpowered computers, not enough RAM, and/or not having the samples on a separate drive as suggested will cause performance issues. Most of the compaints I've heard are from people who are trying to use it outside those recommendations.
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BFD Performance???
Great, thank you for your help.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mac Pro Performance | master-fader | macOS | 0 | 11-21-2011 02:08 PM |
PT9 Performance? | Chingy | Pro Tools 9 | 4 | 11-09-2010 03:20 PM |
More RAM = no better performance?!? | fly-deluxe | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 10 | 01-09-2004 06:14 PM |
OSX vs OS9 performance | Stage | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 8 | 05-23-2003 06:58 PM |
about HD performance | 8e design | Storage Subsystems | 1 | 07-28-2002 10:08 PM |