Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 10
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2012, 02:56 PM
pinnacle pinnacle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: sydney
Posts: 204
Default sends vs outputs

What is the difference between out puts and sends? Not sure when I need to use one or the other. I was watching a tut on side chain compression and noticed he used the outputs to to bus the tracks to the aux. Why would he do that and not use sends?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2012, 03:31 PM
Lincoln Mitchell Lincoln Mitchell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 247
Default Re: sends vs outputs

Pretty simple, outputs are physical, directs the signal to a physical output on your interface/converter.
Sends direct signals elsewhere via a bus. The bus can be used as an input on an aux, an audio track, a compressor for sidechaining.

Busses can be connected to outputs, so you can send to an output as well...
__________________
Lincoln Mitchell

Pro Tools | latest
Mac Mini Server | OSX | Current
16GB Ram | SSHD
Apogee Ensemble Thunderbolt
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2012, 03:36 PM
pinnacle pinnacle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: sydney
Posts: 204
Default Re: sends vs outputs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln Mitchell View Post
Pretty simple, outputs are physical, directs the signal to a physical output on your interface/converter.
Sends direct signals elsewhere via a bus. The bus can be used as an input on an aux, an audio track, a compressor for sidechaining.

Busses can be connected to outputs, so you can send to an output as well...
Thanks for that so why would the guy in the tut use outputs then if he is just bussing to an aux track for compression?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2012, 05:08 PM
Bill Denton Bill Denton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,644
Default Re: sends vs outputs

Let me try to draw you a "mental picture" (easy for me, since most people say I'm mental anyway)...

Sends, busses, and outputs in a DAW come from the terminology used in the old mixing console days.

Imagine you've got a long metal box. Along one of the "long" sides you have a series of jacks. For the moment, we'll call them "input jacks".

Along the other "long" side you have a series of jacks. For the moment, we'll call them "output jacks".

Then, running lengthwise in the box, are several wires. For the moment, we'll call them "busses", since that's what they are.

Each one of the "input jacks" has a series of switches attached to it. These switches allow you to connect the input to one or more of the busses. Since you use these switches to send the associated input to the bus(es), these switches are often labeled "sends".

Some of the "output jacks" will also have a series of switches attached to them, allowing them to receive a signal from one or more of the busses (and feed the signal out the "output jack"), while some of the busses will be directly connected to a dedicated "output jack". These switches are used to connect the signal on the "bus" to one or more outputs, depending upon the configuration.I

In an "actual" console (or mixer), you will typically find a record bus (used to feed a tape deck or A/D converter(s), one or more monitor busses, and one or more AUXillary busses, which are for various purposes.

It's a little more complicated than this, but I've given you enough to get the basic idea. Something that is helpful is to visit a console manufacturer's website and look at the pictures while reading this, and if the site has a signal flow diagram you can correlate the things I've mentioned here with the diagram.

Now, pinnacle, you are not allowed to post here any more 'cause Avid sold Pinnacle...I'm sure you understand...

You failed to mention if the dude in the video was using a hardware compressor or a plugin...it does make a difference.

If the guy was using a hardware compressor, he would have to send the both the "trigger" signal and the signal to be compressed to outputs so they could be used to feed the compressor.

And keep in mind that in most DAWs you can name sends/busses/outputs whatever you want to, so while it may have been labeled an output, it could have actually been a send-to-a-bus...
__________________
X
Note that all opinions, observations, whatever, in this post are mine, unless I'm being mean or am wrong, in which case it's somebody else's fault. I do not work for Avid (their loss)...my only relationship with Avid is that of a customer (when I'm not too poor to buy stuff, like now)...and that hot administrative assistant...that's more of a "thing" than a "relationship" (that should keep them guessing for a while...)

Just rockin'...what more is there?

Bill in Pittsburgh
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2012, 05:25 PM
pinnacle pinnacle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: sydney
Posts: 204
Default Re: sends vs outputs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Denton View Post
Let me try to draw you a "mental picture" (easy for me, since most people say I'm mental anyway)...

Sends, busses, and outputs in a DAW come from the terminology used in the old mixing console days.

Imagine you've got a long metal box. Along one of the "long" sides you have a series of jacks. For the moment, we'll call them "input jacks".

Along the other "long" side you have a series of jacks. For the moment, we'll call them "output jacks".

Then, running lengthwise in the box, are several wires. For the moment, we'll call them "busses", since that's what they are.

Each one of the "input jacks" has a series of switches attached to it. These switches allow you to connect the input to one or more of the busses. Since you use these switches to send the associated input to the bus(es), these switches are often labeled "sends".

Some of the "output jacks" will also have a series of switches attached to them, allowing them to receive a signal from one or more of the busses (and feed the signal out the "output jack"), while some of the busses will be directly connected to a dedicated "output jack". These switches are used to connect the signal on the "bus" to one or more outputs, depending upon the configuration.I

In an "actual" console (or mixer), you will typically find a record bus (used to feed a tape deck or A/D converter(s), one or more monitor busses, and one or more AUXillary busses, which are for various purposes.

It's a little more complicated than this, but I've given you enough to get the basic idea. Something that is helpful is to visit a console manufacturer's website and look at the pictures while reading this, and if the site has a signal flow diagram you can correlate the things I've mentioned here with the diagram.

Now, pinnacle, you are not allowed to post here any more 'cause Avid sold Pinnacle...I'm sure you understand...

You failed to mention if the dude in the video was using a hardware compressor or a plugin...it does make a difference.

If the guy was using a hardware compressor, he would have to send the both the "trigger" signal and the signal to be compressed to outputs so they could be used to feed the compressor.

And keep in mind that in most DAWs you can name sends/busses/outputs whatever you want to, so while it may have been labeled an output, it could have actually been a send-to-a-bus...
Thanks for your detailed help :) I kind of get it but all the terminology numbs my brain slightly. In the tut he was using pro tools and just pro tools basic plug in compressor not a hardware one. Heres the link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY14bjCAX-M
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2012, 02:30 AM
barlevy barlevy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Israel
Posts: 132
Default Re: sends vs outputs

sends split the sound -whereas output simply bus the sound to whatever output you want
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-2012, 05:36 AM
Lincoln Mitchell Lincoln Mitchell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 247
Default Re: sends vs outputs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinnacle View Post
What is the difference between out puts and sends? Not sure when I need to use one or the other. I was watching a tut on side chain compression and noticed he used the outputs to to bus the tracks to the aux. Why would he do that and not use sends?
I think i finally see your question. You are asking why he selected busses for the track output right?...

Well, I think it was said, but yeah, that will send the entire contents of the track along the bus.

Had he used a send it would have created a parallel compression aux...

Much of this has more to do with using axes vs. sidechaining...
__________________
Lincoln Mitchell

Pro Tools | latest
Mac Mini Server | OSX | Current
16GB Ram | SSHD
Apogee Ensemble Thunderbolt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some outputs and sends were made inactive? ZombiesAreJerks macOS 1 04-27-2013 04:26 PM
Sends default to -inf preference...resetting all sends to 0 Nathan W. Post - Surround - Video 3 07-15-2011 12:10 PM
outputs vs sends for mixing down within pro tools roark 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 03-30-2011 03:59 PM
Copying Sends Levels between sends Premo Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 11 09-27-2008 10:03 AM
Sends Vs. Outputs 3Dbuddah Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 06-21-2003 04:28 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com