|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Why are you here if you're not interested in helping or contributing? Go make some music yourself.
I'm trying to learn and understand the software better. What's bad about that? Is it getting too complicated for you? People asked me to post screenshots of the entire session. Including you. That's what I did.
__________________
PT 2018.10 Windows 10 x64. RME Fireface 802. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Quote:
I think it's interesting, and you have done a good job of pointing to something that might be essential. I've no answers, though. I will follow. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Quote:
Exactly- no sweat
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
You can always chill with a fine Finn guitarist: Mauri Berg – (from Pyhajarvi to Adelaide)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5mrcrFAseU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMzezAsLgIo Less Off-Topic: Eventide Precision Time Align plugin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6VIR0SsV1A Then – back On Topic – please!
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Quote:
Aux sends only get ADC applied in PTHD - I didn't notice you specify if you were using HD, so presumably you're using regular "vanilla" PT. EDIT : Scratch that - that'll teach me to skim read. So the session IS properly compensated, this is just a display issue? I was beginning to wonder if it was something to do with the dual buffer system PT now has, with Aux tracks being in the high latency buffer, and audio tracks that aren't routed through an Aux, being in the low latency buffer. Could be a factor if there is an audible problem (I also vaguely remember a bug, whereby a send on a track that was on the right of the return track, on the mixer topology, caused some weird ADC issue). But from what you're saying, it sounds like the Audio Engine is working correctly, but the display is not reflecting that calculation accurately. I'm going to stay out of this particular rabbit hole. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by Carl Kolchak; 03-30-2017 at 07:57 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Ahem... Sadly, this feature is only for HDX
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
You need to think of the total audio path - not each channel in isolation.
eg: In your second example where you feel the display is wrong (which it is not) Audio 2 has a plugin which delays it by 62 samples. That audio has three routes to the mix buss. Route 1 - (Channel Direct) - Plugin delay 62 samples + compensation delay of 2306 samples = path delay of 2368 samples. Route 2 - (Send to Aux 1) - Plugin delay 62 samples + plugin delay of aux 1 of 2306 samples = path delay of 2368 Samples. Route 3 - (Send to Aux 2) - Plugin delay of 62 samples + plugin delay of aux 2 of 1172 samples - plus compensation delay of 1134 samples = 2368 samples. All paths have the same delay. If the auxes added an addition 62 samples of delay in this case they would then be 62 samples late against the output of the channel and would consequently phase on the mix buss. Everything is working and shown as intended. Regards, Mark |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
Mark, you're talking about the second image of my test session. What you are saying makes sense - at first thought. But now let's consider the same 3 routes that Audio 1 takes:
Route 1 (direct): Plugin delay 0 samples + compensation delay of 2368 samples = path delay of 2368 samples. Route 2 (send to Aux 1): Plugin delay 0 samples + plugin delay of Aux 1 of 2306 samples = path delay of 2306 samples. Route 3 (send to Aux 2): Plugin delay 0 samples + plugin delay of Aux 2 of 1172 samples + compensation delay of 1134 samples = 2306 samples. That would mean the direct signal from Audio 1 would be out of phase with the signal coming from Aux 1 and 2. What do you think about this?
__________________
PT 2018.10 Windows 10 x64. RME Fireface 802. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Help me make sense of these ADC readings ...
That appears to give pause for thought, but I would suggest that the user visual feedback here is simply limited.
If the audio on Audio 1 is to be correctly delay compensated in your example it needs to have a compensating delay on it's send of 62 samples. There is nowhere to display this in the interface. That's my 2 cents anyway Best, Mark |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does this make any sense????? | hecatomb | MIDI | 7 | 07-09-2007 07:12 AM |
does this make sense?? | richsorr | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 03-21-2007 12:09 PM |
Does this make sense to anybody? | magnolia1 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 08-18-2006 12:48 PM |
Does this make sense to anyone? | landford | Post - Surround - Video | 1 | 09-27-2004 05:36 PM |
Does this make sense??? | VincePro | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 09-17-2002 09:42 AM |