|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Quote:
__________________
Brian See profile page for system details |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Super interested in your post Mark. I was using the same Firewire satellite and always running into 9172's and 9173's at low buffer settings. When trying to add an overdub near the end of a session, I would have to put all the UAD plugs in inactive mode to get by.
So I upgraded to a UAD-2 Octo PCIe card, hoping I could work in lower buffer settings more consistently in case I had overdubs to do in a mixed session, but am still running into the errors. Not all the time, but they do happen. As you can see in my sig, I have an external Thunderbolt box that houses both the HD Native and UAD card, so I'm wondering if that could be the problem. I've tried doing some testing as well, keeping an eye on the total system delay (in Setup->Session) to see if there is a limit I can reach before I start getting the errors. In my heaviest sessions I can be at 9000 samples of delay with UAD plugins, so I can get errors then, but even when I'm at around 3 to 4000 samples of delay it can still happen. I definitely understand the UAD plugins add a ton of latency, so I'm not looking to do initial tracking with them and work at low buffers all the time, but I was hoping with the PCIe card I could get a little better performance. Its most frustrating when my CPU is at 12 percent, am using 30% of the UAD card, and still getting errors. Mark, if you could share a little more details of your CPU usage, total system delay, etc and still able to work at these low buffers with no errors would be super helpful for me! Been looking for a post just like yours.
__________________
Mac Pro Cylinder 2013, Mavericks 10.9.4, 10 Core Intel Xeon E5 3.0 GHZ, 256GB Hard Drive, 32GB Ram Pro Tools HD 11.2.1 HD Native PCIe and and UAD-2 Octo PCIe in Magma ExpressBox 3T HD I/O 16x16 Analog UAD Software 7.10 6GB Lacie 2Big Thunderbolt drive for Audio (set up in JBOD mode) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Quote:
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Console"]2023 Mac Studio, PT Ultimate 2021, S1x2, Dock, UA Apollo Duo [FONT] _____________________________________________ Some credits: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/john-...s/date-asc/100 http://soundbetter.com/profiles/3845-john-siket |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Quote:
Are you talking about the Mavericks optimization guide? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
No, Mountain Lion.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Console"]2023 Mac Studio, PT Ultimate 2021, S1x2, Dock, UA Apollo Duo [FONT] _____________________________________________ Some credits: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/john-...s/date-asc/100 http://soundbetter.com/profiles/3845-john-siket |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
HDX with 12 Core 2013 MP 64 GB RAM Mavericks, 2 X Quad Satellite Firewire zero issues here.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Can you post a link please? I've only seen the Mavericks guide. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New UAD Thunderbolt Satellite = MUCH, much better Pro Tools performance
Quote:
http://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/...e-9073-errors/ And here's the Mountain Lion optimization guide: http://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/...mountain-lion/ And Mavericks: http://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/...0-9-mavericks/ And trashing preferences: http://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/...s-preferences/ I had the same problems as the OP: My cpu was always peaking out, many times turning red. My cpu ran constantly in the 60-80% area. I always had to render tracks with plugins. I could barely record anything without problems. If I even opened the gui on certain plugins, I'd get big problems. I even considered getting an HDX card thinking that might help. But about 5 weeks ago, I meticulously followed the 10.8 optimization guide. It turned out that I'd missed a couple of small things. Then, I trashed my prefs. BOOM! It was like I got a new computer. It's been running great ever since! And now, I'm using more tracks and plugins than ever with no problems--even at 88.2khz with the buffer@32! I also "repair permissions" on my system drive once a week and use Disk Warrior on all my drives once a month. But the big payoff was following the optimization carefully then trashing prefs. Good luck!
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Console"]2023 Mac Studio, PT Ultimate 2021, S1x2, Dock, UA Apollo Duo [FONT] _____________________________________________ Some credits: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/john-...s/date-asc/100 http://soundbetter.com/profiles/3845-john-siket |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video satellite le/intensity shuttle thunderbolt sync drift | garret | Post - Surround - Video | 9 | 02-28-2015 11:28 AM |
2013 Mac Pro: Thunderbolt Performance Tips | DavoBali | macOS | 2 | 07-03-2014 10:58 AM |
UAD Satellite Quad latency w/PT 10 and Thunderbolt? | anackman | Pro Tools 10 | 1 | 04-30-2014 04:52 PM |
Thunderbolt display affecting performance on my MBP | EDurney | macOS | 4 | 12-16-2011 05:25 AM |
Optimal performance settings on satellite | Nathan W. | Post - Surround - Video | 3 | 12-30-2009 08:55 PM |