|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
That 350 samples is from TDM world which I know by heart. Perhaps HDX is faster?
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
Sample session
Picture 1 is the session in playback - note AbbeyRoad Native reverb. 2000+ samples of Delay Compensation. Picture 2 - 3 tracks in REC mode. Note that CMP (compensation on the REC enabled tracks) is Zero now. That means they are not time time aligned with the Reverb return. Fine for a reverb but could surprise you if parallel processing while tracking. The total delay in plugins (DLY Line) is worst on the Ac Guitar track - 31 samples + 10 samples more for the Master. This is how HDX works. I believe TDM worked the same way but it has been 5 years since I used it.
__________________
2017 27" iMac 3.8GHz i5, 1TB SSD Logic ProX, Studio One V4, PT current version, Apogee Ensemble TB Musician: http://www.ivanlee.net/ Design Engineer: http://www.propowerinc.com/resume.html Last edited by propower; 02-15-2017 at 11:52 AM. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
Quote:
I've never been in that situation. Not saying its not vilid, just curious?
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors. MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
Quote:
Not talking about plugins that take huge lookahead time, just eq+comp+reverb+delay and some spice plugins here and there. Most of the time I don't see total latency below 256 which means TDM systems actually have had higher latency than Native systems, despite people shunning at Native systems because they are cheaper. I use both, and artists don't hear a difference.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
So real world... in my HDN setup, with a 64 buffer and tracking at 44k.... with one Slate VMR on the vocal track reporting 0 delay... is that latency wise better/worse/same than an HDX System set to 64 or 128 (my Magma had to be set to 128 in the old days) with the same plugin (one slate VMR)? It's hard for me to test this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Brian www.brianjanthony.com MacPro 6 core 3.46 Cheese Grater HDX and HD NATIVE 48 gig Ram PT 2019. Something Sierra 192 IO and 96 IO TDM user way back. PT user since 98. I'm either working, sick, or both. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
HDX vs native set to 64 buffer at 44.1 with a Native plugin (VMR) on the Record enabled track will have a bit more latency (from the mixer routing and necessary AAX-DSP plugin before the Native one) than HDN.
Buffer independent latency only happens with HDX if you use only AAX-DSP plugins on the record enabled track.
__________________
2017 27" iMac 3.8GHz i5, 1TB SSD Logic ProX, Studio One V4, PT current version, Apogee Ensemble TB Musician: http://www.ivanlee.net/ Design Engineer: http://www.propowerinc.com/resume.html Last edited by propower; 02-26-2017 at 10:14 AM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
On my session when recording vocals or live musicians I just set my hdx2 to 128 buffer and use sends for the cues. (Thru the xmon) I can have all plugs running on other tracks with native or dsp plugs. If the record enabled track has a native like a slate vmr it just gets auto disabled. It just works fine. I don't ever recall having latency issues if I just set the proper buffer setting. Are people experiencing them on hdx? Or is this thread an academic one?
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
IMO - Academic
If you put a Native right after an AAX-DSP plugin it will not disable when placed in Record and will have at least 2X the DAW buffer added in latency. If you don't have an AAX-DSP plugin ahead of it it will disable in REC and add no latency.
__________________
2017 27" iMac 3.8GHz i5, 1TB SSD Logic ProX, Studio One V4, PT current version, Apogee Ensemble TB Musician: http://www.ivanlee.net/ Design Engineer: http://www.propowerinc.com/resume.html |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
I have, but those are in the range of 256@48k being just fine and 512@48k being unbearable
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?
Quote:
The buffer is, of course, irrelevant with HDX and TDM. Turn it to 1024 and you'll still have the same low latency and, indeed, TDM and HDX will automatically disable native plugins in the monitored track when in record mode. I'd say the thread's mostly academic and trying to correct misinformation being perpetrated by the moderator. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HD Native latency | stevegalante | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 6 | 03-17-2014 11:49 PM |
PT HD Native & HDX / latency? | kirkbross | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 13 | 08-24-2013 09:48 AM |
HD NATIVE vs HD TDM latency | James Drake | Pro Tools 10 | 20 | 06-19-2012 04:27 PM |
omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency | chrisdee | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Win) | 34 | 03-30-2012 07:24 AM |
HD Native latency | CamM | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 2 | 11-30-2010 07:02 PM |