Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2007, 11:50 PM
peppertree peppertree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 1,610
Default Authoritative on RAID usage?

I loathe the word "support". "Digidesign does not support RAID technology."

What the heck does that mean? Does it mean "We're not going to give you tech support on that there bub." or does it mean "We decided not to qualify that because our margins are too thin to make it worth it." or does it mean "We got some bug reports that all included RAID systems so we have the impression it's flakey" or does it mean "We do low-level filesystem interfacing to squeeze performance out of these boxes that will most certainly NOT EVER work with RAID systems until we decide to fix it at some undetermined point in the future, that is, if we decide to."???

It could and has meant any or all of these things just with this one company. Can someone tell me if they have succeeded in using PTLE on Mac (intel...I have a Mac Pro) on RAID drives anyway?

Anyone who robotically repeats "Digidesign doesn't support RAID" will get a bronx cheer. I would like a "It seems to work fine for me" or a "It DOES NOT work. PERIOD." along with any supporting information you have at hand. Thank you.
__________________
`My name is Pro Tools HD, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and native DAWs stretch far away.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2007, 09:16 AM
Park Seward's Avatar
Park Seward Park Seward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 4,284
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

You are right. There is not much explanation. One I found from Digi:

Disabling RAID:

RAID is a type of array configuration for your hard drives that can save files between discs or mirror the file to a backup. Unfortunately, this causes erratic and often catastrophic errors with Pro Tools. To disable this feature, find the RAID controller option - it's usually found under the 'Advanced' menu.

I read that an HD user said he was getting 80 tracks from one FW 800 drive so there seems to be little need for a RAID to increase throughput.

However, Glyph says:

Our in-house testing has shown that, in an audio environment, the highest track count can be achieved in JBOD mode. In JBOD mode, using our 48 KHz/24-bit test sessions, the GT 062 supported 80 tracks at edit level 1. At 192 KHz/24-bit, either mode was able to handle 36 tracks at edit level 1. 36 is the max track count we can test using our Pro Tools|HD 2 system.

Above tests were done using Power Mac G5 Dual 2GHz, OS 10.4.8, Pro Tools 7.1, HD|2 Accel, GT 062 connected via FireWire 800.

So how come this works for Glyph???
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2007, 06:49 PM
peppertree peppertree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 1,610
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

Thanks Park for that info.

I posted this in the LE forum thinking most likely there is a difference in filesystem interfacing between TDM and LE (think about how it will go out on the bus for instance). I wouldn't be at all surprised if things worked on LE and not TDM.

Digi probably is afraid of getting in trouble making any indication beyond "We don't support it." But they could just say "We have reports that it has worked and hasn't worked for people, so if you choose to enable it, it's at your own risk."

Anyway I decided to disable it for now. But I figure with simultaneous streaming samplers etc. it would be beneficial to have it. I wonder if Pro Tools plays nice with RAID on other drives it itself isn't in charge of accessing. Although I'm not sure if RTAS encapsulates filesystem access for virtual instruments as well...I would guess it doesn't.
__________________
`My name is Pro Tools HD, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and native DAWs stretch far away.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2007, 07:10 PM
Park Seward's Avatar
Park Seward Park Seward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 4,284
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

Perhaps you could try the Round Robin recording option. That is "sudo-RAID" since it does spread the audio over several disks.

RAID works well for video. The only difference I see is the file sizes are much smaller for audio. It may be hard to re-assemble those "little bits" for RAID playback.
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2007, 02:35 AM
ProfessionalTool ProfessionalTool is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 100
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

I'm reviving an older post here because adding to this discussion seems like a better idea than starting a new one...

To assume that people are using RAID arrays specifically for throughput is missing the target a bit, in my opinion. Redundancy of data is an essential to the modern work flow. Backing up after recording is like pulling out as a form of contraception. Use of Mirrored RAID arrays, or ideally RAID 5 (combo of redundancy, speed, and efficient use of drive space) is the NORM in professional environments for every other creative digital field. There's a common phrase used at a place i work: "You either have your data in 2 places or you have it in 0".

If the concern is bogging down the processors, it's a non-issue with dedicated hardware RAID systems. Latency shouldn't be a problem as long as the device has a large enough cache and you're going over SCSI or Fiberchannel to connect to the PT system. There's no issue with taxing the drive that the protools system is on, because we're all recording to a secondary drive right? Is it the session file itself, not the raw AIFF's that is causing the problem?

So what's the dealy, yo?
RAID is supported and encouraged with Logic (just like faster than real-time bounce, but that dead horse has too many bruises already). Too bad logic aint my cup of tea. Why does DIGI yell "RAID?!?!?!?!?" like a bunch of cockroaches on my tv?
I just really hate the idea that an entire session has to live on it's own until i can make a copy manually.

</rant>
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:53 AM
Alex T. Alex T. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 216
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

I personally don't care what their support stance is since I don't need to call their support line since I can get everything working fine myself. I have a 1TB Western Digital MyBook setup which is configured in Raid 0. Guess what? Works just FINE with 32 tracks running with maxed out plug ins....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2007, 12:24 PM
tash tash is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

I'm not a MAC or LE user. I run M-powered on Quad-core PC, but I was searching posts about RAID with Pro tools. They cleary say that they don't support RAID of any sorts regardless of the platform.

But the company I bought my PC from says it's perfectly fine to have RAID-0 (though not real RAID in a true sense, but striping- it won't help you keep a back up) and that will provide better throughput.


I have two 250 GB harddrives and they're striped as a single 500 GB audio drive. I don't know about MAC-OS, but WIndows at least won't see that those two drives are physically seperate when RAID-0 is enabled.

So far I don't notice any problem. I tried 40 tracks at once, but no problem. I originally use the configuration to get the highest track counts on Cubase I got, but at least It's not causing a noticable problem. With 32/48 tracks on Pro tools M-powered,too. I don't know it will make a noticable improvement, either, though.

Tash
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2007, 07:31 PM
M.Brane M.Brane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 1hr N/W of LA LA land
Posts: 1,999
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

Quote:


I have two 250 GB harddrives and they're striped as a single 500 GB audio drive. I don't know about MAC-OS, but WIndows at least won't see that those two drives are physically seperate when RAID-0 is enabled.
That's because a RAID 0 (striped array) becomes a single volume to the OS.

The first problem with a striped array is if one drive has any kind of problem that breaks the volume all your data on that volume is lost. There is no recovery.

The second problem with a striped array is the increase in seek time due to splitting reads/writes between 2 or more drives. This is detrimental to audio work especially if you have a lot of edits across lots of tracks.

RAID 0 just doesn't make any sense for audio work so I can understand why Digi doesn't support it.

They don't support third-party CPU upgrades either, but mine works just fine thank you.

If you want to use a striped array for audio knock yourself out, but you're really not gaining anything over a JBOD which is a lot less trouble/risk.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2007, 11:41 PM
tash tash is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?



Quote:

That's because a RAID 0 (striped array) becomes a single volume to the OS.


That's basically what I said.

Quote:

The first problem with a striped array is if one drive has any kind of problem that breaks the volume all your data on that volume is lost. There is no recovery.


Yes. You still do need to make a back-up every day with RAID-0. But,a non-RAID harddrive needs a back-up, too.. And that's why I said it's not a RAID in a true sense.

I see the difference using the striped harddrives, though. RAID 1 is slower in either writing or reading(I don't remeber which), but RAID 0 is actually a bit faster than a single drive of the same kind from my experience.

But then I'm talking about my other DAW. Truthfully, it works fine with Pro tools, too, but I don't know if it's worth getting if you don't already have such a setting especially just for 32/48 tracks.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-19-2007, 01:28 AM
TimInVan TimInVan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 10
Default Re: Authoritative on RAID usage?

Hi Everyone,

Well I'm not a raid expert, but I have configured raid arrays before (I'm in IT). Someone mentioned JBOD. That's just a bunch of disks (not really raid). JBOD - 'Just a bunch of Disks'.

I could see why Digi would not support software based raid, but hardware based raid (mirrored drives or raid-5) I think would work as the O/S only see a big disk. However, unless you try it, you'll never now and hardware based raid controllers (or external raid arrays) can be costly.

I don't think Raid would give a performance increase (at least not with raid systems you could afford). Read speeds may be faster (depending on how the array is setup), but write performance will likely be slower than JBOD (again assuming you don't have $50K lying around ata minimum).

The only minor advantage would be for recovery from a disk failure. In which case, you can simply use some software to create an image backup of your drive each night.

Cheers
__________________
TiminVancouver
G5 dual 1.8 1.25 gig
digi002r
PT 7
Logic Pro
Waves Gold
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To RAID or not to RAID in Mac Pro 2009 derhamm macOS 2 10-30-2012 09:49 AM
What would normal disk usage considered to be in the usage window? Digitopian 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 09-08-2009 09:50 PM
RAID controller usage? digi_dude002 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 07-13-2005 01:55 PM
On Board Raid or PCI Raid Adapter ??? Allen Hallada 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 6 01-21-2002 06:16 AM
When is a RAID really a RAID? Will this increase track count? ThomCat 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 07-25-2000 12:28 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com