Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Licensing & Accounts
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 12-23-2015, 07:22 PM
Rectifried Rectifried is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 504
Default Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners

Consider it frozen
__________________
Hal Cragin On the DUC Since The Year 2000 AD

Ventura ,PT 2022.10, MacbookPro 13"[2020] M1 16G, Antelope Orion 32+ Gen3..SSL Sigma summing, SMART Comp C1LA, CharterOak EQP-1 Oceanway Audio HR4S monitors . SSL X-Rack w XR618 compressors, dbx 160x [2]
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 12-28-2015, 05:20 PM
LDS LDS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,502
Default Re: Avid: Can you please explain the reasoning for HD upgrade price?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
The cost is no more than HD's high-end pro audio competition.

I doubt any of the competition has released a paid 'upgrade' with so few new features though?

The riff between Vanilla & HD is the problem I think. Why do PT11 users get a half priced support plan compared to PT10/9/MP 6-9 users, while PT HD11 users pay the same as PT HD9 users?

It does seem as though the HD users who have paid Avid the most over the last few years are the ones that are getting stung the hardest?
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:27 AM
Skytouch Skytouch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 137
Default Re: Avid: Can you please explain the reasoning for HD upgrade price?

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael c View Post
With all the flaming and complaining on these forums, whether justified or not, can someone officially from Avid please explain the reasoning for the extreme higher cost to HD owners to upgrade their license(s)? I know in my case, whether I feel your answer is valid or not, it will at least give me a sense of why you are charging your most loyal customers who have put out the most money for your software AND hardware an idea why they are being charged so much more. We have been loyal customers since 1998 and before that, owned an Audiomedia card...

It seems odd that we can't even 'downgrade' to vanilla PT12 and use our expensive Avid hardware, and if we upgrade this year to 12HD we will now never be able to sell our licenses? It all feels punitive.

If you can give us HD owners an official statement, I think I will at least feel you are being honest to your customer base. Once you reply, you can even lock the thread to avoid having to constantly reply to other related questions.

Thank you.
Michael, this is exactly where I am stuck on updating PT11HD Omni to 12HD. Well stated. I am sitting on an unregistered 12 Vanilla license upgrade purchased a day ago, deciding if I want to upgrade my HD license instead before Dec 31st. I just can't get past the penalties and risks associated with breaking up a perfectly fine, integrated 11HD HW+SW system.

Sky
__________________
(Opinions are my own, etc.)

Mac Studio M2 Max 12/30/64GB/4TB, RME UFX III, Pro Tools Ultimate, MacOS Ventura.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:43 AM
Skytouch Skytouch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 137
Default Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
One sec...so if PT 12 vanilla is $29 / month (monthly plan), that's $360 a year for PT vanilla. PT 12 HD upgrade is $599 for the first year (no idea why), but then $399 a year after that for PT HD.

So really, you're spending $278 more for the HD version over the course of 2 years. That's not that bad, though I don't know why PT HD upgrade is $599 for the first year - that really makes no sense to me.
I see the 2015 pricing this way:

HD = $200 for the 11>12 perpetual upgrade, plus the first annual $399 support subscription bundled in.

Vanilla = $100 for the 11>12 perpetual upgrade, plus the first annual $99 support subscription bundled in.

The big cost difference is in annual support. Someone with a complex HDX system may need higher levels of support, but someone with a desktop Omni HD DAW? Their support needs are much closer to a Vanilla user, albeit still not software only.

Sky
__________________
(Opinions are my own, etc.)

Mac Studio M2 Max 12/30/64GB/4TB, RME UFX III, Pro Tools Ultimate, MacOS Ventura.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:57 AM
Skytouch Skytouch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 137
Default Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wall2Wall View Post
That's not a bad idea. Much cheaper than the hardware requirement. But...they will be leaving the low end completely. They can't compete in the low end anyway with logic, cubase, live, et al.
My view is that they should create one unified software product and drop a yearly major update in the Apple Store (Mac users) each Jan 1st @ $399. Then make it clear, that all support and value-add updates stop for prior versions. That would have the same effect as the current HD upgrade plan, without all the confusion and extortion tactics. Maybe the price could be a bit lower to capture more in the Vanilla market.

For comparison, this is what Apple is already doing with Logic, although updates are less frequent than yearly. When a new product drops, it's $199. No special upgrade pricing.

Sky
__________________
(Opinions are my own, etc.)

Mac Studio M2 Max 12/30/64GB/4TB, RME UFX III, Pro Tools Ultimate, MacOS Ventura.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:05 AM
Skytouch Skytouch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 137
Default Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners

Quote:
Originally Posted by propower View Post
AVID will continue to charge what they do until they believe that they can make more money by charging less. It is great they gave up the unbelievably stupid original idea of freezing out HD owners that don't jump onboard. The fact that your HDN and HDX systems won't run without HD software means they already have you. They can actually ask any price they want. You will either pay it, stay with your system as is or leave. Eventually (like when you need a new computer) you will pay or leave. Sadly - I don't think the company cares any more than that. They are perfectly willing to let all the ones that don't "have" to use HD leave. They even price reduced Vanilla to the point that if you could use that instead - it is 5 to 10 times cheaper to maintain up to date.

For a business - I say "whatever"... its peanuts. To folks who love HD and are not in business - it costs the same as 3 movie channels/month. Is it "worth it"? If you need it - yep. If you want it - yep. If you can live without it - nope.

Will there be deals down the road? Most likely but not for certain.

My hope is that the yearly numbers for AVID are so bad they sack the whole management team. I believe they are the problem...
Solid analysis.

Sky
__________________
(Opinions are my own, etc.)

Mac Studio M2 Max 12/30/64GB/4TB, RME UFX III, Pro Tools Ultimate, MacOS Ventura.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:14 AM
Skytouch Skytouch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 137
Default Re: Avid: Can you please explain the reasoning for HD upgrade price?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
Nuendo and Sequoia are right up there. CueBase is equivalent to vanilla. The change happened when PT started being able to run on other hardware.

The thing to do is freeze your system at current versions. That's what most major music studios do.
Current HD/HDX hardware is certainly a good match for cheese grater Macs. Locking into this combination makes sense for someone not needing more than what PT11HD offers. Even 12HD can work here. Pay $599 to get in and let the support plan expire next year, unless Avid offers an upgrade worthy of continuing into 2017.

Sky
__________________
(Opinions are my own, etc.)

Mac Studio M2 Max 12/30/64GB/4TB, RME UFX III, Pro Tools Ultimate, MacOS Ventura.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 12-31-2015, 07:34 AM
Logichead Logichead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 437
Default Re: Avid: Can you please explain the reasoning for HD upgrade price?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
The thing to do is freeze your system at current versions. That's what most major music studios do.
Avid proudly introduces *System Freeze HD* for 2016!

No need to upgrade if your system is already working!
Save days on system installs!
$ave lot$ of ca$h on plugin update$
You can still sell your iLok asset!
Buy used pieces of Avid hardware when you need them!
Collaboration via DropBox for free!
You'll be free to focus on your music!
Keep your chickens fed!

Avid is "listening" to your requests!

Best...H

Last edited by Logichead; 12-31-2015 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 12-31-2015, 09:13 AM
TAMBOR TAMBOR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 162
Default Re: Avid: Can you please explain the reasoning for HD upgrade price?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logichead View Post
Avid proudly introduces *System Freeze HD* for 2016!

No need to upgrade if your system is already working!
Save days on system installs!
$ave lot$ of ca$h on plugin update$"
You can still sell your iLok asset!
Buy used pieces of Avid hardware when you need them!
Collaboration via DropBox for free!
You'll be free to focus on your music!
Keep your chickens fed!

Avid is "listening" to your requests!

Best...H
You used to be a staff writer for Saturday Night Live, right?
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 01-04-2016, 03:28 PM
alex s alex s is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 245
Default Re: Why is 12 three times more expensive for HD owners

What I find most gut churning, and believe me, it makes me furious every time I think about it is the $999 charge if your support plan lapses.

How many customers are shelling out their $599 or $399 simply to avoid incurring such a ridiculous punitive cost ?

Ok, so Avid can do what they like regardless of fairness. Looking at the upgrade / no support plan option available to standard PT owners not available to those who have HD is a good example.

But the the $999 charge is coercion and according to the dictionary obtaining money, property or services from a person, entity, individual or institution through coercion is extortion.

If the $999 isn't just a strong arm tactic by Avid to keep people on their support plans I'd like to hear how that figure was reached ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buying a used Control 24. Is it still a good idea? Owners or ex-owners please help! Intini ICON & C|24 19 01-01-2009 10:57 AM
Does This seem expensive to you? funeral 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 02-20-2007 10:17 AM
Least Expensive was to get into TDM PhatBit Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 22 06-03-2005 02:41 AM
Some times there is a waveform when recording and other times not ? duderonomi 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 04-04-2003 10:17 PM
Which is more expensive? Sudsy 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 12-10-2001 10:52 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com