|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
The main issues I have with lack of fast bounce are very simple:
1. Sometimes my heavy cpu intensive synths such as Spectrasonics create small ramdom 'clicks' or skips on real time playback. The only way I can get a clean render of them is to offline bounce. If there was a way to do this in PT then that would solve the problem. 2. My preference is to render midi to audio - I prefer to mix with audio than midi. If I had to wait 'real time' for all my midi tracks to render separately it would take forever. I have to crank out 20-30min of music a week with huge orchestral templates and stems. All that said, I love everything else about PT, but I just can't use it at least for my purposes for the time being. If there is some sort of work around I don't know about, then please post! :) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
Hi there - I'm just doing my every year or two check to see if a fast bounce feature has been implemented in PT.
Thanks |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
What is the point of this spam? Off line/non-realtime bounce can't be implemented until the RTAS legacy code is removed. And that's been discussed here a lot in the past. So you can save yourself time, and us reading all these posts, and ask again when Pro Tools 11 has shipped.
If you really need fast bounce now lots of other products out there have it. And nothing stops you manually printing a VI track (or as many in parallel as your computer can handle) with Pro Tools. Darryl |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
Woah - calm down there dude! Take a chill pill, relax maybe see a movie take a walk on the beach. It was a simple question. I'll quietly go back to my Logic forum where people are cordial and considerate of others
cheers |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
See you in two years
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
Yes that's one good thing Logic can do, but not enough reason for me to want to go back to it. I'm actually spending time with Reaper which also does offline bounce. Kenny Gioia's and Shane's advocacy for that program make me think that there are some serious people drawn to it.
__________________
HD Studio, PT2022.6, UA Apollo x6, 2018 MacBook Pro, 32 Gig, Big Sur |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
Pro Tools 11 -> Fast Bounce FINALLY! Thank you Avid!
Now maybe I can post about this without being verbally raped by a random disgruntled Avid forum member |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
See you just had to wait until PT11 and ask
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
And it's SUPER fast!!!
Faster than the competition? Does anyone know if other DAWs do up to 150x realtime? |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 10 offline or 'fast bounce'?
For True audio quality you have to bounce real time it's the only way to do it
;^)
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
offline bounce different than realtime bounce | grant howarth | Pro Tools 11 | 8 | 12-08-2013 09:29 PM |
OK, but seriously, OFFLINE BOUNCE! | Kris75 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 120 | 04-09-2013 06:55 AM |
Offline bounce | spyfly | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 02-21-2007 12:50 PM |
offline bounce? | danielfre | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 12-28-2006 02:04 PM |
Offline Bounce? | bboiii | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 12-12-2005 02:38 PM |