|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Soundflower into Pro Tools
I think I know the answer, but I just wanted to ask:
Does any one know if you can rout Soundflower outputs into Pro Tools inputs? Is there some clever way to use the plug-in inputs on an Aux track? (Is the answer "no, you dummy. Why don't you just buy an ADAT firewire interface and run ADAT cable into the 192?") |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
Assuming you have a digital output on your puter, could run an adat cable from that into your convertor...
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
There might be a way to do this with Bidule... I know you can get bidule inputs into pro tools as a rewire device, I'm using it to bring in ethernet audio from audioport universal. So if you can access soundflower i/o in bidule(which I'm pretty sure you should be able to), then yes.
The only problem with this on a TDM system is it eats up voices since the bidule rewire inputs to pro tools come in as RTAS plugins. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
That would work. However, my question was an extension of a conversation on another forum about the limits of using Bidule in rewire mode. Soundflower would be a way to use Bidule as a VI host in standalone mode.
I'm hoping Vienna Ensemble Pro is going to solve a lot of these VI problems. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
I hope it doesn't break any forum rules to include a link to another forum. Here it goes:
http://vi-control.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12671 The general consensus I've read is that Bidule works better in standalone with a hardware connection than via Rewire. I had just built a template with Bidule using Rewire, and it didn't hold up in a moderately demanding session. I ended up putting all the instruments back directly into Pro Tools. I don't know if it's because Rewire is relatively old technology or if it's that it only uses one core of multi-core machines. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
I do have a cable from the digital out running into the 192. I had that set up for using Soundminer before they got the rewire working properly for that. The only trouble about using it for standalone VI's or for Bidule is that I usually need more than one stereo pair, either for stemming or for a reverb send. I know, I know, I'm too picky...
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
Quote:
Quote:
Just to give you an idea of what I'm doing, I'm running bidule as a rewire device with PT 6.4.1 in a mix system on a dual 1.0 G4. I am streaming 32 channels of rewire into the mix system with bidule. The catch is that my VI's are on a separate PC, so what I have in Bidule is 16 stereo instances of AudioPort Universal VST(Takes 32 channels of audio from the PC over the ethernet). The only RTAS in PT is the rewire inputs. This runs without a hitch for 12 hours straight. Much different situation than yours, yes, but it does work. In your case the whole point of the mac pro is to use that 16GB of ram on the single machine so you don't have all the wires and computers that I do. One other trick that does work, is to copy the Bidule app and rename it. You can then open these as separate programs, and make as many as your system will handle. I haven't tested it under heavy load because all my machines have 4GB of RAM or less, but it does work as far as I can tell, and since the Bidule license allows you to run as many copies of it as you need, I don't think it technically breaks the EULA. If you have some R&D time, here's what I would try: 1. Start with a clean PT session, no RTAS other than your rewire inputs 2. Create a bidule rewire device. 3. Open a renamed standalone bidule app. 4. Connect the rewire bidule to the standalone bidule with soundflower. Just an idea... one flaw I can already see in it is there are only 16 i/o via soundflower. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
I've been asking Digi to please give us a route into PT from native for a while now. I think there are enough users who could benefit from this. It's seems ridiculous that we have route out and back in physically.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Soundflower into Pro Tools
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ichat and Soundflower with Pro Tools | giltzer14 | macOS | 2 | 11-08-2012 09:30 AM |
Routed audio into Pro Tools w/ Soundflower | lincol1 | macOS | 14 | 04-19-2012 10:34 PM |
Anything like Soundflower available on PC? | ChuckS | Windows | 0 | 04-09-2011 10:36 AM |
Soundflower and 001? | Gothboy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 09-04-2007 01:43 PM |
soundflower and 002? | mickblah | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 02-24-2007 11:53 AM |