|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cheers, STeff --------------------------------------- MacPro5,1 ; 6-Core Intel Xeon 3,46 GHz, 32 Gig Ram, NVIDIA Quadro K5000 with 3 displays connected OSX10.15.7 Pro Tools|HDX Ultimate 2023.6 HD I/O&192Digital&96&96i I/Os D-Command ES 4xUnitor8 & 2xAMT8 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
This bug has existed in PT 11.0 when it was release in June. The beta testing team was clearly asleep and should have caught this bug. it is very clear Avid no longer listens to there customers anymore. As a long time (25+ year) customer this is clear case of totally "dropping the ball"
But in the big picture Avid has real problems as they are 90-120 days from bankruptcy. So bug fixes are real low priority until someone takes over. Releasing pro tools from hardware has not made Avid any money it has only cost them even more losses. I got another 5-6 years before I can retire I was just hoping that this mess would have happened later on. The writing is on the wall at there NO VISIONARY'S left at Avid the see what is a plain as day as to what is going on. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Quote:
Quote:
This ADC goof is indeed a serious bug, and needs to be addressed. Until then, it might be helpful for those of us who commonly process the multi-out VIs to list the lowest-ADC plug-ins. If anything, it will help minimize the impact until this gets fixed. We can attempt to curtail our own problem until a proper bugfix eliminates it.
__________________
Pro Tools HD 12.4, Pro Tools "Vanilla" 12.4, Artist Transport, 2x Artist Mix Studio Blue: RME UCX, Win7 Pro, i7 960, 16GB || Studio Green: RME Babyface, Win10, i7 7700HQ, 16GB |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
AUX ADC is only compensated if you have HDX
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Hi,
I don´t understand exactly what you are saying here? Are you saying that if for example I set the output of two audio tracks to a aux input and put a plug-in that causes delay on the aux-track ADC doesn't compensate for that in non-HDX system? Regards, Markus
__________________
Windows 10 Intel core i7 4790k, 16Gb ram MacBook Pro Retina 13" late 2013 OSX 10.12 Intel Core i5 2,4 GHz 8GB Pro Tools 2018.4 Eleven Rack + Expansion pack RME Fireface UCX |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Quote:
The deeper I get into full track mixing and additional production on PT11HD native system I'm baffled by what seems to have happened with ADC since PT10. Big track counts and things get loose, new softsynths will be out of time, or AUX midi FX running late, as well as the VI multi out bug. It's really like a shifting focusless pool of pain! In busy sessions I haven't time to troubleshoot the cause of these events, like everyone else I just expect it too work. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Seems to me this bug is serious problem to fix or it would have been corrected by now.
PT 11 audio engine was rewritten from the ground up right? What a headache for Avid I bet.. It's FUBAR I'm sure... Meanwhile they're like, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. EC |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
This still isn't fixed in Protools 2019.12!
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aux Inputs and Latency Compensation - something's not right.
Oh my god, this is insane!! I am trying to move back over from Reaper....i have the most simple session set up where i am running some parallel comps on aux tracks...every time i turn a plugin with latency on or off, everything goes out of time. To top it off, if i actually want to proper pro tools automation system i have to get the most expensive package at 80 bucks a month....for a system that can't do PDC? And looking around the forum, i see this has been a problem for 6 years?????? I am starting to wonder what the hell is going on at Avid. They charge such a massive amount more than any other company - which i could justify, if the software actually worked. I am trying my best not to just be another person dissing avid, but this is kind of ridiculous isn't it? I would say 70-80% of the comments in this forum are users who are seriously upset about Avids lack of development, or fixing even the most basic problems. The charge insane amounts - and don't even give you proper track counts or automation unless you get the most expensive package, then they take many times longer than any other company to deliver the things their user base wants. Again, this could all be justified if the system was super stable, ultra reliable and rock solid. but that just doesn't seem to be the case. Am i missing something? Would so love to be wrong about this. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Automatic Latency Compensation - PT 10 - Am I doing this right? | gbross | Pro Tools 10 | 4 | 11-30-2011 04:41 AM |
Latency Compensation... | mickeymassacre | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 2 | 01-24-2008 03:44 AM |
Latency Compensation | BluesBoySteve | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 25 | 04-20-2006 02:59 AM |
Aux Track Latency Compensation? | TelosHedge | Tips & Tricks | 36 | 02-20-2006 12:52 AM |
latency compensation | JerryT | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 06-27-2005 11:02 AM |