|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PT 9 vs PT 10
"X vs.Y threads (Mac vs. PC, Pro Tools vs. Nuendo, etc.)"
Does that mean that PT 9 vs PT 10 topics are not allowed? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
I'd say yes and no. By the rules no but if its more of asking is it enough for $300... still no because I'm sure you could find another thread to help your decision or just read the product page.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
9 vs. 10 is a pointless topic anyway. 10 is no doubt superior in many ways. Whether or not it is right for YOU is the question.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
PT10 is without a doubt superior to PT9.
__________________
~ tom thomas Formerly hobotom Pro Tools Ultimate 2024 HDX Hybrid HD Omni and 192 I/Os Windows 10 Intel Hexcore i7 All Samsung Pro SSDs Ampex MM1200 2" 24 trk tape Outboard: UREI, Eventide, Lexicon, Yamaha, TC Electronics, Orban, ART, EchoAudio, Dolby, Hughes, API, Neve, Audio Arts, BBE, Aphex, Berringer, MOTU, dbx, Allison, etc. Plug-ins: Too many to talk about. www.metrostudios.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
As one would expect, otherwise why buy it.
But as Dism said "9 vs. 10 is a pointless topic anyway. 10 is no doubt superior in many ways. Whether or not it is right for YOU is the question."
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz) Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples) 1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro) GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4 PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim CASE: Fractal Define XL R2 PT 11HD (v11.3.2) Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII HD 96I/O |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
just posted this in another thread. I think the main fearures speak for themselves. The long ADC on native, clip gain, disk cache etc ... but one that isn't mentioned anywhere is the time it takes in 10 to swap between sessions.
Not sure how noticeable this is on average to small sessions but on some of my 'heavy duty DSP projects' is cuts times by 4 or 5. Swapping between the same sessions that would take me 4 to 5 minutes on 9 (with DSP cache enabled) now only seems to take 30 seconds or so in 10. That alone saves hours by the end of the week. Chris
__________________
Chris Lambrechts Applications Specialist- Live Sound |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
So 'X vs.Y threads' are allowed sometimes depending on what is being compared?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: PT 9 vs PT 10
Quote:
X vs Y threads that are referred to in the forum terms of use are there for things like Mac vs PC flamewars for example. Look at the as a sortof 'Parlay' code of conduct. The code would be more sortof what you would call 'guidelines' |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|