|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Produce at 96 kHz for a higher quality 48 k output?
Hello,
I am working on creating tracks for sync purposes (video, and streaming) and I am also would like to work on film composition in the near future (also working in Dolby Atmos) My question is working at 96khz something done widely in the industry or should I just stick with working with 32 floating point and 48khz I have Pro Tools Ultimate running on an RME baby face pro. I have Adam a7x with Mogami cables in a decent enough treated space. I also own a pair of HD800s. I ask her in post since I am wondering what resolution are you all working in and what type of files do you receive stuff in thanks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the best quality video output for PT | capt kirk | Post - Surround - Video | 12 | 04-14-2012 06:11 AM |
Using 18 channels of not m-audio I/Os (even higher quality)? | UlrichKe | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 0 | 03-13-2010 05:20 AM |
96k and higher digital output on 192 interfaces? | InjuredEar | Tips & Tricks | 3 | 01-13-2006 08:27 AM |
Sound quality difference with higher sample rates | jwd65 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 9 | 09-16-2004 01:05 PM |
Will a Higher Quality Power Cord improve the Sound? | leon777 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 10-01-2002 09:29 AM |