Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session

[filosofem]

For country and man! Stig.

[chrisdee]

No problem.

[Stig Eliassen]

Originally Posted by filosofem

For country and man! Stig.

Will do it!

I've thought about it a bit, and I don't need to hear it to test it. Sometimes I'm too stupid for my own good.

[Stig Eliassen]

The track names and waveforms should explain what the test revealed.

I penciled in some 1/8 notes on two instrument tracks with Vacuum, using both presets. Recorded the output from both onto audio tracks. This was the 192 kHz session.

Then, I imported everything from the first session into a 96 kHz session, and recorded the outputs from Vacuum onto two new audio tracks. That should do it, no?

[chrisdee]

Great, thanks Stig!.

So you get the same result as me. I can clearly se that the decay is
shorter in the 96 kHz file compared to the 192 kHz file.

The question now is why does this happen?
Bug?

[filosofem]

Without viewing the Vaccum plug-in setting, how do you know it's the ENV Decay? Are AMP ENV Sustain and Release Off?

[chrisdee]

Originally Posted by filosofem

Without viewing the Vaccum plug-in setting, how do you know it's the ENV Decay?

Because I made the patch my self.

It's not a very big issue, because I can increase the decay value (move the knob to the right) in the 96k session
and it sound like it does in the 192k session. But if I save the patch in 96kHz and then open it in 192k the
decay time is longer than in 96k.

I just think this is odd.

[filosofem]

Lodge it with IdeaScale.

[chrisdee]

Originally Posted by filosofem

Lodge it with IdeaScale.

Ok.

[DigiTechSupt]

As indicated in the Ideascale post, we've been able to repro this and have it logged for a fix.

Thanks for the report.