Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Pro Tools 2018

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2016, 07:50 PM
DJ Hellfire DJ Hellfire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,030
Default Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Anyone else feel like the minimum cloud storage prices are too expensive? The free one isn't even enough to hold a full length stemmed instrumental and the Premium one is too much for just wanting to try it out on a real world project. Not saying $9.99 is a lot of money, but just more than I need to start off with, especially being that most Pro Tools users I know aren't even on 12.
__________________
www.HellfireBeats.com

Akai MPC 2000XL, Akai MPC X, Mackie 1202VLZ Pro, Akai Advance 61, Focal Alpha 80, UAD 2 Apollo Quad, UAD 2 Satellite Quad, UAD 2 Octo PCIe, Neve R6 "Lunch Box", Neve Portico 511, Neve Portico 551, Neumann TLM49

Pro Tools 2018.10

Mac Pro 4,1 (5,1 upgrade), Early-2009, 3.46GHz Nehalem 12-Core, 32GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

13" MacBook Pro, Late-2011, 2.4GHz Dual Core i5, 16GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

27" iMac, Late-2012, 3.4GHz i7, 24GB RAM - OS 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2016, 09:02 PM
nige108's Avatar
nige108 nige108 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 261
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Agreed. The beauty of the way in which the system works is that you and your collaborators can work on the same project within PT.
But this restricted unless you buy more storage. I was hoping to be able use the system to flesh out ideas with my songwriting partner allowing us to both be able to make changes on a track by track basis. Sending stems back and forth does not allow this kind of flow. I can't get one session loaded up into a project even after trimming the fat.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2016, 10:35 PM
metalmixer metalmixer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 204
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

yes and no ... there are plenty of plugs that cost $300 - $600 for ONE plug-in.
I would go for the 60GB plan but only getting 10 projects is not enough for me at any given point I am working on 30 to 40 songs at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2016, 11:40 PM
electrodaddy electrodaddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

I'm confused why there should be a restriction on the number of projects? Surely the disk space is enough. Or are Avid not confident on how their systems perform?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2016, 04:53 AM
amagras amagras is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 3,211
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Quote:
Originally Posted by electrodaddy View Post
I'm confused why there should be a restriction on the number of projects?
exactly
__________________
Dell XPS 8700. Intel Core i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz. RAM: 16GB. Windows 10 Home x64. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645. NI Komplete Audio 6. Pro Tools Software 2019
amagrasmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2016, 01:56 PM
Dizzi45Z Dizzi45Z is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UT, United States
Posts: 1,721
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

I also agree that there are a ton of limitations here-- Even with the top plan. An artist can't even have an album with more than 10 songs loaded.

If the storage space is so expensive for Avid and the users, then why do we have to have the whole project loaded in the cloud? If I am tracking drums, I am going to easily fill up a few gigs with multiple takes of the drums which will eat up tons of space. I'd rather just have my main playlist loaded on the cloud. I don't need all of my playlists loaded on the cloud.

I would love to be able to use this with my studio to help my clients get drums recorded at my place remotely, but I imagine that drum tracking will fill up too much space to make it worth it for my clients.

Other studios that I collaborate with would no way be able to stick with 10 sessions and 60 GB with all of their sessions going. They usually record orchestral parts for most of us. So until things change with storage and session limits, I just don't see how PT CC will be able to be implemented in our workflows.
__________________
recording.guru : FREE Pro Tools Tips and 19 Video Basic Training Course
Pro Tools 12.8.3 HDX Mac OS 10.12.6
Mac Pro Quad 3.2 Nehalem with 32 GB RAM
Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-05-2016, 02:42 PM
electrodaddy electrodaddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

A potentially good concept that has been badly executed by bad marketing and execution. Typical Avid.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2016, 07:33 PM
nigelpry's Avatar
nigelpry nigelpry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home
Posts: 2,154
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Has anyone been able to assess what the lossless compression is achieving it terms of saving space?

Also, if you only share selected tracks, not all tracks, is it only tjose selected tracks that eat into your storage allowance?

So your project could be several gigs in size (eg with multiple takes of everything) but if you only share the active playlists, and only certain tracks, then your cloud storage needs are reduced?

I thought that was how it's supposed to work.

Plus I still can't get over the fact that if you have multiple licenses that each have a paid support plan, you still only get the same amount of storage as someone with one license. That's just bonkers.
__________________
Mac Pro 2009 with 2010 firmware, 12-Core 3.46ghz, 64gb RAM & working Thunderbolt, OS 10.13.6 and Windows 10
Macbook Pro 2011 17", 2.2ghz i7, 16gb RAM OS 10.12.6
Digi 003 Console, Focusrite Octopre and MOTU Traveler for extra analog-ADAT conversion, UAD Apollo Quad with Thunderbolt card, Apollo Twin mk11 and pci-e Octo, Adam A77X monitors.
Pro Tools 2018, Media Composer 8.9, Sibelius 8.7, Cubase Pro 10, Wavelab Pro 9.5, Logic Pro X, Mainstage 3.
Various apps, soft synths, FX plugins.
Plenty of hardware synths, rack gear, microphones etc.
And then there's the studio ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2016, 01:28 PM
DJ Hellfire DJ Hellfire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,030
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dizzi45Z View Post
I also agree that there are a ton of limitations here-- Even with the top plan. An artist can't even have an album with more than 10 songs loaded.

If the storage space is so expensive for Avid and the users, then why do we have to have the whole project loaded in the cloud? If I am tracking drums, I am going to easily fill up a few gigs with multiple takes of the drums which will eat up tons of space. I'd rather just have my main playlist loaded on the cloud. I don't need all of my playlists loaded on the cloud.

I would love to be able to use this with my studio to help my clients get drums recorded at my place remotely, but I imagine that drum tracking will fill up too much space to make it worth it for my clients.

Other studios that I collaborate with would no way be able to stick with 10 sessions and 60 GB with all of their sessions going. They usually record orchestral parts for most of us. So until things change with storage and session limits, I just don't see how PT CC will be able to be implemented in our workflows.
Especially when you're recording at 192kHz!
__________________
www.HellfireBeats.com

Akai MPC 2000XL, Akai MPC X, Mackie 1202VLZ Pro, Akai Advance 61, Focal Alpha 80, UAD 2 Apollo Quad, UAD 2 Satellite Quad, UAD 2 Octo PCIe, Neve R6 "Lunch Box", Neve Portico 511, Neve Portico 551, Neumann TLM49

Pro Tools 2018.10

Mac Pro 4,1 (5,1 upgrade), Early-2009, 3.46GHz Nehalem 12-Core, 32GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

13" MacBook Pro, Late-2011, 2.4GHz Dual Core i5, 16GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

27" iMac, Late-2012, 3.4GHz i7, 24GB RAM - OS 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-06-2016, 01:29 PM
DJ Hellfire DJ Hellfire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,030
Default Re: Cloud Storage prices are too expensive

Quote:
Originally Posted by nigelpry View Post
Has anyone been able to assess what the lossless compression is achieving it terms of saving space?

Also, if you only share selected tracks, not all tracks, is it only tjose selected tracks that eat into your storage allowance?

So your project could be several gigs in size (eg with multiple takes of everything) but if you only share the active playlists, and only certain tracks, then your cloud storage needs are reduced?

I thought that was how it's supposed to work.

Plus I still can't get over the fact that if you have multiple licenses that each have a paid support plan, you still only get the same amount of storage as someone with one license. That's just bonkers.
Doesn't seem like much space saving to me. I couldn't even get one whole beat on there with the free plan.
__________________
www.HellfireBeats.com

Akai MPC 2000XL, Akai MPC X, Mackie 1202VLZ Pro, Akai Advance 61, Focal Alpha 80, UAD 2 Apollo Quad, UAD 2 Satellite Quad, UAD 2 Octo PCIe, Neve R6 "Lunch Box", Neve Portico 511, Neve Portico 551, Neumann TLM49

Pro Tools 2018.10

Mac Pro 4,1 (5,1 upgrade), Early-2009, 3.46GHz Nehalem 12-Core, 32GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

13" MacBook Pro, Late-2011, 2.4GHz Dual Core i5, 16GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

27" iMac, Late-2012, 3.4GHz i7, 24GB RAM - OS 10.12.6

Last edited by DJ Hellfire; 04-07-2016 at 07:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Company COPY Cloud Storage. philip888 General Discussion 13 06-04-2013 09:43 AM
cloud storage? reichman Storage Subsystems 14 08-08-2012 01:10 PM
Cloud Storage: Comcast kicks guy off...BMI says aka21stCentury General Discussion 0 09-26-2011 07:52 AM
Does This seem expensive to you? funeral 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 02-20-2007 10:17 AM
Least Expensive was to get into TDM PhatBit Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 22 06-03-2005 02:41 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com