Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2001, 05:54 PM
Jamble Jamble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 102
Default Mackie or Allen & Heath

Trying to decide between a 1604VLZPRO and a WZ16:2DX. Anyway, does anyone here have an opinion as to which might be preferred. I'll be using it for live sound mostly.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2001, 02:49 AM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

In case you didn't already see that one:
http://acapella.harmony-central.com/...ML/003259.html
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2001, 04:35 AM
Jamble Jamble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 102
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

Thanks for the link!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2001, 08:36 AM
msunj msunj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Houston Texas USA
Posts: 185
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

I own an Allen and Heath and I've been very happy with it. I like the fact that it has a direct out on all 16 channels. I've gotten some very nice acoustic jazz recordings, recording up to 14 tracks at once. To my ears it sounds a little more natural that when I've recorded through the older Mackie boards, but I haven't a chance to record through the new 1604.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2001, 05:13 PM
Jamble Jamble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 102
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

Are the outs pre-fader and pre-eq?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2001, 09:03 PM
msunj msunj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Houston Texas USA
Posts: 185
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

The outs are post fader and eq.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2001, 08:44 AM
Burton Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
Posts: 390
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

The direct outputs are post-fader post-eq, but can be reconfigured internally and actually ordered from Allen & Heath with pre-fade direct outs.

I've got a MixWizard sitting next to a Mackie VLZ, and I track everything thru the MixWizard. I just use the Mackie to route audio from various sources to my monitors on the play-back side. The MixWizard eq is better than the Mackie, and the pre's have more headroom and punch. Drums thru the mackie sound more sterile and lifeless. (Although for some applications, a sterile uncolored pre might be perfect). If I were to buy just one of these mixers, it would be the Allen & Heath. (Although an SSL would be nice too!).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2001, 09:06 AM
GIE GIE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 111
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

Mackie: better Pre's... But I hate the EQ's.
A&H: Better EQ's and the Pre's R OK.

So if I had to choose between those two:
A&H [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img]
__________________
GRTX
GIE
****
Let's talk SOUND.... not features!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-17-2001, 08:40 PM
Jamble Jamble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 102
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

Thanks for the input! I must say, I do enjoy using those 100 mm faders more than the 60mm ones. Nice to know I could have those outputs pre-fader--cool!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2001, 08:01 PM
VanEdge VanEdge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 134
Default Re: Mackie or Allen & Heath

you gotta go with the Allen and Heath - the sweepable EQ is too important.
Plus, you get the great faders and it's an excellent piece of gear.
it also BLOWS away mackies for live situations, and that's a big plus in case you ever need it outside of the studio.

one other advantage - not sure if all allens have this - is the seperate phantom power for each channel. mackies do not have this and if you try to use phantom power on all available channels, they have a tendency to crap out on you.

that being said, mackies are cheaper, super reliable, and they sound damn good. however, if you really know what you are doing, the allen and heaths are much more flexible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anyone tried FW mixers? presonus, mackie, allen/heath bradp Pro Tools 10 0 05-23-2012 06:02 AM
Allen and Heath ZED 24 mrjames Pro Tools 10 3 05-03-2012 02:23 PM
allen and heath gs 3 mersisblue Tips & Tricks 6 09-01-2003 08:50 PM
Allen & Heath GS2 with 001 Keith Lowdon 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 01-19-2002 09:51 AM
Mackie vs Allen & Heath smrp Tips & Tricks 8 11-03-1999 03:53 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com