|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
If I run a signal from the directs out of my Mackie into the mic/line inputs of the 001 with the -26db pad depressed, thereby making it a line input, will I have completely avoided the 001's mic pre's? Or will there still be a trace of distortion in this signal path?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
You're still dealing with their converters. While the Digi001 is a great value, the converters and pre-amps are nothing special. One of my customers is a writer in Nashville and uses a Digi001 with a Neuman U87 for putting his tracks down. He was very unhappy with the sound. I recommended to him to get a Grace 101 for an affordable but very clean mic-pre. The problem is what I originally suspected and that was headroom. So the best option was to get the Apogee Rosetta to bypass the Digi001 converters altogether. While an expensive upgrade, it also makes a night and day difference in audio quality!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
How can you bypass the Digi's converters? If your analog signal is going into the Apogee, converted to digital, and then input to the Digi's Line#3 input on the back (for example), isn't the Digi re-converting the signal again, or is the converted (now) digital signal from the Apogee going in direct, untouched by the Digi?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
I believe the presonus digimax will do the job.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
For what you pay for I think the mic pre's are good, not great but what do you expect for $1,600 (Canadian).
Regards, Alex T.
__________________
Alex www.dreamware.ca Have something to brag about...Own a Dreamware Audio PC... My Rig: AMD Athlon XP 1700+ 512MB PC2700C2 Corsair MSI KT3ULTRA ARU 2x 80GB Seagate Barracuda 4 in RAID 0 GeForce 2 Ti 64MB Lite-On 40x12x40 CD-RW 16x Pioneer DVD Intel Pro/100 + SB Audigy Digi 001 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
Xterling,
When using the Apogee convertor, the digital output connects to the the SPDIF inputs. Therefore bypassing the 001's ADC's. In addition, the clock from the Apogee is better than the 001. Even if you had to use the 001's ADC's, by connecting the Apogee's SDPIF to the 001 and setting PTLE to SPDIF sync, you'll find that the sound tromendously improves. Less "jitter". Hope this helps. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How to avoid using the 001\'s mic pre\'s?
Or you can use an outboard effect with good converters..I use my own lexicon mpx 500..put it into bypass and use its spdif outs into the Digi OO1 spdif in's..
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mic pre's: MBox 2 VS cheap Behringer pre's VS M-Audio Firewire 410 (Mp3 samples) | DanielPinho | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 05-18-2009 04:14 PM |
Lining outboard pre's through the Digirack pre's | falsemetal666 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 08-16-2006 04:53 PM |
002 Pre's vs Behringer Pre's opinions | mfavila | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 16 | 07-15-2005 09:41 AM |
Routing An External Compressor Thru 001's Pre's | Bloux | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 01-18-2003 08:03 PM |
digi pre's Vs Mackie pre's - anyone? | Mike F | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 04-01-2001 04:49 AM |