Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2005, 09:31 AM
Sil B Sil B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Windsor, Canada
Posts: 4
Default G4 processor upgrades

I am running PT 7 and Tiger on a G4. All is fine accept when bouncing to disk; this is the only function that is not working. I get a DAE error 9073; "... fragmented disk ... CPU overload..." My G4 processor is 733MHz; I know not recommended by Digidesign. Since i am not ready to give up my Mac G4 yet, my question is this; has anyone done a processor upgrade on a G4? Please share your experiences or thoughts on this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2005, 10:53 AM
Tiago Silva Tiago Silva is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 335
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

We have upgraded a G4/500 AGP graphics to an OWC G4/1GHz. It's noticeable, but it's not enough for heavy mixing. We're going to let it become an editing station and bring on the Dual 1.25 we have waiting on another room.

If you upgrade, upgrade at least to 1.4GHz.
__________________
A job's not done until it's ready, or the producer is breaking down the studio's door...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:23 PM
len branville len branville is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 315
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Hello,

Like Tiago I upgraded (a while back) my G4 400mhz AGP with a Sonnet 1.2 gig processor. It's faster a gave new life to my G4 (not recommended by Digi but even at one time running an Accel 2 in it naughty).
However, if I had to do it all over again, I would have put the money I spent towards a "G5 purchase fund". Mileage really varies with these especially when put to service as a DAW (I've seen 'em work though).

My 2%

len
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2005, 08:31 PM
studiojimi's Avatar
studiojimi studiojimi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,115
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Quote:
Hello,

Like Tiago I upgraded (a while back) my G4 400mhz AGP with a Sonnet 1.2 gig processor. It's faster a gave new life to my G4 (not recommended by Digi but even at one time running an Accel 2 in it naughty).
However, if I had to do it all over again, I would have put the money I spent towards a "G5 purchase fund". Mileage really varies with these especially when put to service as a DAW (I've seen 'em work though).

My 2%

len
i've posted this several times in various thread on this same topic but it hopeful can only be helpfully informative

i just upgraded thru OWC (other world computing)
their 1.8. dual into what was my 933 quicksilver

bounce to disk is much better

there have been some quirks but Tiger seem to be smart somehow ant they are appearing to straighten themselves out

i'm just not sure i'm gonna recommend this yet to the DUCkies at large until my 30 day return trial is up and i have not chance to return this "experiment"

feel free to contact me and discuss
__________________
CAZADOR RECORDING
PT10.3.10/HD6/192w16in/MTN.LION OS 10.8.5 / Westmere MacPro 8 Core W/20gRAM MAGMA-PE6R4/TDM&RTAS/WAVES Platinum/UA/Eventide Plugs/I usually record at 88.2
With GOD as my partner. . . I need to make my plans LARGER.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2005, 08:05 AM
Sil B Sil B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Windsor, Canada
Posts: 4
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Thanks to all that have posted their thoughts on this subject; its helped me a lot. Check back in a week or so and i will post my results on the upgrade i am going to do to my G4.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2005, 06:54 PM
proxy proxy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 406
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Don't know if you've gone ahead, but I'll add that I had the QS 733 and upgraded with a GigaDesign and it was well worth it. I upgraded to a mere 1gig processor, but due to the lack of the cache (bottleneck for that model) on the QS 733, the upgrade felt like more. Very stable as well.

FWIW,

- proxy
__________________
G4 dual 1ghz QS (1.5gig RAM) / OSX v10.3.9 / HD4 / AD8K / PT v6.9
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2005, 10:20 AM
studiojimi's Avatar
studiojimi studiojimi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,115
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Quote:
Don't know if you've gone ahead, but I'll add that I had the QS 733 and upgraded with a GigaDesign and it was well worth it. I upgraded to a mere 1gig processor, but due to the lack of the cache (bottleneck for that model) on the QS 733, the upgrade felt like more. Very stable as well.

FWIW,

- proxy
i'm seeing a pattern with certain editing moves i normally could make that used to set protools to crashing a few software versions back

i'm thinking maybe i may need to adjust my settings

i had a kernal yesterday

the 2nd or 3rd since my upgrade....

i'm being vigiliant and will report back
__________________
CAZADOR RECORDING
PT10.3.10/HD6/192w16in/MTN.LION OS 10.8.5 / Westmere MacPro 8 Core W/20gRAM MAGMA-PE6R4/TDM&RTAS/WAVES Platinum/UA/Eventide Plugs/I usually record at 88.2
With GOD as my partner. . . I need to make my plans LARGER.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2005, 10:39 PM
ddayson ddayson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

Updated a G4 466 to a G4 1.4Ghz via OWC (2M L3 Cache), and it's perfect.

Thi primarily with a Mix++/PT 5.1.3 on OS9.2.2.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-19-2005, 07:47 AM
studiojimi's Avatar
studiojimi studiojimi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,115
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

https://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Powe...lver/Upgrades/

the 1.8. is NOW $50-60 higher than a month ago

this shows and tells me that there is a demand for the supply of these babies

some people out there are wanting to buy

i was wondering if any of you could share the setting levels in PT software you are using with success with HD4

i think my recent couple of kernal panics may be due to software settings in pro tools and i have not adjusted mine since the recent 7.0 install and am using the defaults

i really would appreciate and email or reply with some info on this
__________________
CAZADOR RECORDING
PT10.3.10/HD6/192w16in/MTN.LION OS 10.8.5 / Westmere MacPro 8 Core W/20gRAM MAGMA-PE6R4/TDM&RTAS/WAVES Platinum/UA/Eventide Plugs/I usually record at 88.2
With GOD as my partner. . . I need to make my plans LARGER.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-19-2005, 09:13 AM
zennman zennman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 69
Default Re: G4 processor upgrades

I have the same 733Mhz Quicksilver model running HD2 Accel and now PT7. I've had a lot of experience with upgrade processors. My QS has had a 1.4Ghz OWC single processor in it for a couple of years now. To make it stable with PT, I had to slow the processor speed one notch below the rated speed of the processor. So I'm running at 1.33Ghz, and my system has always been stable.

Newer G4 processors run at faster clock speeds, but lack the L3 cache. I have not had any luck with any of these upgrades faster than 1.4Ghz with Protools so far. Also, companies are marketing these upgrades with over-clocked specs. If you read the fine print, you'll see some processors rated at 1.0Ghz, but sold guaranteed to work at 1.2Ghz. Only trust the rated spec, not the overclocked spec.

OWC is good because you can adjust the speed with jumpers. Sonnet is only automatic adjusting, but seems to work fine. Sonnet only markets their chips at the chips native clock speed and are very reliable.

I've had "nothing but heartaches" with Giga Designs.

Powerlogix are now marketing their chips at the overclocked speeds. So keep that in mind. You need to stay with a chip with the 2Mb L3 cache.

Protools 7 seems to have a performance loss with single processors and only optimized for multi-processors. My QS running with the single 1.33Ghz is not really fast enough for native samplers. The 1.5Gb memory limit doesn't help either.

Final release testing of Pro Tools 7.0 has shown that there are some performance issues with certain RTAS plug-ins when used with single processor computers. Instance counts on OS X-based LE systems may show a small decrease with certain plug-ins; Windows XP-based LE systems may incur a small performance hit as well with these plug-ins. All plug-ins tested show significant instance count gains on dual-processor computers. Digidesign is actively looking at these issues and hopes to have a fix for this as soon as possible.

My advice is to only upgrade to a dual processor. Powerlogix has a 1.2Ghz dual with L3 cache is the $500. All other processors will definitely speed that 733 dog of processor, but PT7 really needs a dual.

Best place to shop is macsales.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Processor upgrades sinsou Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 4 03-10-2007 02:22 PM
Processor Upgrades Digibill Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 4 10-20-2004 08:22 PM
Processor upgrades? Don Z 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 10 02-01-2004 03:32 PM
OT....... Processor Upgrades 100 or 133 MHz??? lenf 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 07-08-2003 12:41 AM
Processor Bog-down. Any Upgrades? steve61 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 6 05-14-2003 08:38 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com