Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Tips & Tricks
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-09-2001, 06:41 AM
LarsRec LarsRec is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 73
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

One other option, albeit expensive, is the Millennia Mixing Suite. I'm using 6 stereo modules that have a bypass switch that allows the signal to be routed directly to the stereo bus. The mixer is profoundly quiet and clean. Tom Jung and Telarc use this mixer for DSD recordings and it's compatible withthe Massenburg modular system. Millennia makes a passive stereo input module with no pan or faders. You can see it at mil-media.com
__________________
JKL
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-09-2001, 08:21 AM
Axis Audio Axis Audio is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cummaquid, MA USA
Posts: 17
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

Here is another interesting option. I have a new Control 24 which has an 8 stereo pair submixer section built in as a standard feature. I cannot yet vouch for its sonic properties when it comes to the summing amp since I have not sprung for the DB 25 snakes for that feature of the console. Is it possible that this 16 x 2 submixer could sound better than the PT mix buss? Probably not.. but it might be worth a try since the feature is sitting there looking lonely at this point. :0)

Barry
Axis Audio
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-09-2001, 09:15 AM
blairl blairl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

When I read this thread I end up asking myself, WHY? Why go to all the trouble? Why convert to analog to sum your mixes? And finally, what is wrong with the Pro Tools mix bus? Use your own ears, don't listen to what the next guy says, (including me). Why has it become so important to go analog to sum? If you are looking to get away from quantization errors which is probably one of the major causes of "thin" sounding mixes, then by going analog you are only increasing the quantization error even further. If you just happen to like the sound of the analog circuits and are not worried about the rise in quantization noise, then that's another thing. Everyone has their own likes and dislikes. That's understandable.

I bought a well known CD that was recorded using Pro Tools. When I listened to it, I was shocked at how bad it sounded. I wondered why. In the end I found out that it was mixed with an analog console, not entirely within Pro Tools. There's another forum going on somewhere about the new Aerosmith CD that was recorded in Pro Tools and mixed on an SSL 9000. http://www.musicplayer.com/ubb/Forum17/HTML/000781.html Some of the comments as to the bad sound of that CD were pointing towards the 9000 as the cause. I haven't heard the CD so I can' t comment. On the other hand, I have heard some great sounding CD's that were mixed entirely within Pro Tools. (I've also heard some garbage). In the end, I think it's the guy behind the controls that's going to be the deciding factor, so I don't buy all of these comments about the sound of the Pro Tools mix bus.

If you would like me to go into detail as to why this solution may cause more problems than mixing entirely within Pro Tools, then I will. If not, just tell me to go away.



[This message has been edited by blairl (edited April 09, 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-09-2001, 08:27 PM
Kenny Gioia Kenny Gioia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New York, NY USA
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

It may be the nut behind the wheel but most of us are comparing our mixes with our mixes.

I don't A/B my mixes against other Pro Tools records.

I've been A/Bing my Pro Tools mixes against my SSL mixes. I'm sorry but the SSL sounds better. Oh Well
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-09-2001, 08:30 PM
rob1 rob1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: New York, NY USA
Posts: 61
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

Blair-

Please tell us more.

-Rob
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-09-2001, 09:11 PM
Erik H Erik H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 5
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

Very timely thread.

What would you guys recommend, if I were looking for a 'minimalist' analog mixing desk with mute and fader (not VCA) auto?

No doubt the Speck/Manley/API things are all workable if all you wanna do is sum a static mix. I'd rather not have to do my rides in PT though, which means more of a 'real' console I guess.

Anyone know if the Millennia Mixing Suite can be fitted with moving fader packs?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-09-2001, 09:58 PM
PeeTee PeeTee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 813
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

You can still do your rides with Ren-EQ2's instantiated on each channel...it dithers it's output. I mentioned this solution above.

[This message has been edited by PeeTee (edited April 09, 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-10-2001, 12:06 AM
COCO COCO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York, N.Y.
Posts: 852
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

anybody tried a Daking sidecar?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-10-2001, 01:06 AM
PeeTee PeeTee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 813
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

The Daking sidecar with master section is $30k. For that price, you can get a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-10-2001, 06:44 AM
Jules Jules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,565
Default Re: API 7800 Master as summing bus for 888\'s

Pee Tee - whats the point fading a signal in PT if you have an insert accrosss (like a compressor0 it on your analog 'summing' console? A fade in PT will f***k the compression up!

Jules
__________________
Jules
London, UK
Come hang with us here!
www.gearslutz.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Master Bus 48 Bit Mixer vs. PTT Summing DrFord Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 7 01-08-2009 02:28 PM
Q FOR DIGI ABOUT AUXES vs MASTER FADERS SUMMING IN PT LE ournature 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 06-14-2007 08:51 PM
API Summing /mixer 8200/7800???? Markycaps Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 08-22-2005 11:40 PM
pro tools summing or digital board summing kingz Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 9 04-29-2004 12:46 AM
D8B Summing vs. Pro Tools Summing Sound Guy Andy Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 10 03-08-2002 04:04 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com