Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
02-10-2003, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
512mb Cache?!
Why does digidesign insist that a 512mb cache setting is ideal for PT performance? Is it really necessary? I mean, everything else on my CPU is ridiculously slow as a result.
thanks, Peter [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] 
|
|
#2
02-11-2003, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 512mb Cache?!
I think that they tell us that as it is the middle of the cache road...
That said, I change back and forth from lower cache when I'm tracking so that things are sped up on screen to higher cache when mixing so that I run more plugs etc. It does slow down the start but allows more plugs-automation to happen. Just my guess anyway. Mike Maas Studio 17
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HDD 16mb cache vs 32mb cache | Matt Rushmore | Windows | 16 | 03-18-2011 12:44 PM |
| Intel 2.8ghz (1mb cache) vs. 3,2ghz (512mb cache)? | Ralph K | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 04-27-2004 11:51 AM |
| Western Digital 8MG cache vs 2MG cache? | Pops | Storage Subsystems | 1 | 11-09-2002 08:00 PM |
| 256k on-chip level 2 cache; 2MB level3 cache | bigsmile | General Discussion | 3 | 01-10-2002 09:58 AM |
| 256k on-chip level 2 cache; 2MB level3 cache | bigsmile | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 01-07-2002 11:41 PM |
Linear Mode
