Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > General Discussion & Off Topic > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2019, 05:14 PM
ToneSetter ToneSetter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: SLC
Posts: 48
Default Bounce to disk: Asio4All vs Interface as Playback Engine

A client hit me up and needs a few easy revisions to a radio edit version of his track I did earlier. I'm not at the studio now but do always keep my backup hard drives with me and my laptop with pro tools 12 on it. My question is, after I make the changes, if I bounce to disk with Asio4All V2 selected as the playback engine (because I do not have an interface with me), will the quality be different or the same as if I had my interface selected as the playback engine when bouncing? I guess the simple version of what I'm trying to ask is, does the playback engine selected affect the quality of the bounce to disk? Thanks in advance for all input
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2019, 05:51 PM
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: nashville
Posts: 34,738
Default Re: Bounce to disk: Asio4All vs Interface as Playback Engine

Unless you have some hardware inserts, the interface should have zero effect on the sound of your bounce(because audio doesn't pass thru it in the BTD process).
__________________
Gigabyte X79/intel i7 3930K, 32GB RAM, DIGI003 Rack
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink...the more I mix.....

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2019, 10:27 PM
xrekcor's Avatar
xrekcor xrekcor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 719
Default Re: Bounce to disk: Asio4All vs Interface as Playback Engine

Thanks for answering that as it is something I have thought about from time to time when I go from the TF5 to the UR44.... The UR44 doesn’t sound near as good to my ears. But it is hardy to use from time to time...
__________________
Rob
———————————————————————————
MBP 15” 2018 macOS Mojave 10.14.6 Touch Bar and ID
2.2GHz 6 core 8 gen Intel Core i7 processor (TB’s to 4.1GHz)
32 Gb of 2400MHz DDR4, 1T SSD, Magic Mouse and Keyboard
Pro Tools 2019.6-23.#, Cubase 9.5, Yamaha TF5, UR44, BEHA4700
........and a bowl of M&M's
———————————————————————————
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does Playback Engine and interface need to be the same? Alexlimbert Pro Tools 12 5 08-03-2017 09:43 AM
ASIO4ALL driver or audio interface driver for playback engine? slidincharlie Getting Started 2 02-26-2017 12:31 PM
ASIO4ALL and the PT10 Playback Engine tpann Windows 4 04-30-2013 02:16 AM
No m-audio interface in current engine (playback engine) SlicerSounds Windows 1 10-04-2012 12:27 AM
Playback Engine -- Where's my Disk Playback option? Wheeltard macOS 5 03-16-2012 06:19 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com