|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
Quote:
The debate about Mac vs PC is not valid. There is no debate because, either, or, is not the right answer. The right answer is that one has to have both and know both OSes in order to enjoy the best of all worlds. Now to a PT-related question and maybe this should be its own subject: What if I wanted to install PT10 on another device. From a license perspective, other than moving the iLoc, does PT care? |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
You can install PT on as many computers as you have. It will only open on the one with the iLok connected
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
The best thing about the ip5 is the LTE service - wow it's fast
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Almost. It's a custom built PC running osx. :)
__________________
Dell T5810. Harrison Mixbus 32C. Haven't used PT since 2015 and never been happier. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
Exactly, what a Hackintosh means...
The easy part of buying a MAC( obviously not the cost lol) is the backwards compatibility... You can install windows on a mac with little to no issues right out of the box... If you prefer that OS for specifics or use programs that only run PC etc..., and you can also do it without bootcamp on most systems. A big plus for me when ordering multiple systems that need both MAC OS and Windows OS... no tooling around, no having to configure [bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep], just done, works... I like that. Just some extra user info |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
What? ! There is such a thing? lol
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
__________________
kickin' at the darkness 'till it bleeds daYlighT
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
Quote:
im using something simular to yourself i use pt9 with the 003. ive noticed your your using pt10 hd how are you doing this with a 003 system? woult u have any tips on the best way to set up pt with a 003 and tascam dm4800 i would appreciate ur help Seamus |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: sound-quality difference between using PT on a PC vs a Mac
Shea have you tried clicking on his name and sending him a personal message?? Much better than pissing people off tagging on threads that have nothing to do with your question...
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sound quality difference 5.13OS 9 vs PT6.41 OSX? | raregroove | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 09-14-2004 12:51 AM |
no difference in sound quality | rems | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 10-05-2002 11:59 AM |
Do I really hear this much difference in CDR media sound quality?? | el biciclista | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 20 | 05-01-2002 07:38 AM |
sound quality difference PT Mix vs Digi001 | Dag | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 01-01-2002 12:47 AM |
sound quality difference btw. logic and ptle? | yayogaak | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 10 | 09-23-2000 11:06 AM |