|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Hello,
I am just about to buy a two track editing and "mastering" program. I only need basic functions because must of my work is made in PT. Need to know your suggestions about it. Thank you for any info. Camilo.
__________________
Camilo Orozco Like us on www.facebook.com/artedigitalestudio www.estudiodegrabacion.com.mx |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Spark is cool: lots of 'pro'-features. Only disadvantage I can think of: it does not support direct editing of split-stereo-files (neither does PEAK I think, but I have PPC 2.5 or something...stopped upgrading the thang and bought me Spark instead)
------------------ Arno Peeters Tape TV Productions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
I'd go for Peak. Why? When you perform an edit with Spark, unless you turn off "no undos," it has to write the original file to disk, make the edit, write it to a temp area and redraw the overview to a .ovw file. Performing lots of edits can take a frustratingly long time. With Peak, it's edit...done...edit...done...edit...done. It's that fast. All your undos are stored and are quickly recalled. Plus, it's very configurable. You can have a custom toolbar, custom keycommands, custom views....it's great.
/paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
I have both, and I find I use Peak more. But Spark is awesome for applying multiple plug-ins for stereo mastering.
Jeff D. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Another Peak or Spark one !
Running PT on a B/W G3 350 , i want to edit (cut & ...)samples from my E4k (via SCSI?) in my Mac & afterwards back to the Emu . What works best & fastest ? What about the TDM versions of both programs ? Marc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
We use Peak TDM with an E-mu E5000Ultra. The SMDI implementation works faultlessly. ("Mac on SCSI bus"...you gotta love that!)
/paul |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
It's right that Spark would need some extra work: the separate overview-file and the backups are pathetic. Also direct support of split-stereo is welcome.
I hope TC is not turning away from Spark. ------------------ Arno Peeters Tape TV Productions |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Spark 2.0 XL was announced at NAMM.
http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAM.../Spark-20.html I still prefer Peak. /paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Anyone used D-SoundPRO ?
It's a shareware sample edit program . [This message has been edited by Marc Cooreman (edited January 30, 2001).] |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Peak 2.5 or Spark or...?
Thank you for all your posts. I think Peak is the way to go.
Thanks Camilo
__________________
Camilo Orozco Like us on www.facebook.com/artedigitalestudio www.estudiodegrabacion.com.mx |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2 Track Editor aside from Peak and Spark XL | Imagine | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 02-16-2005 12:49 PM |
10.3.3, Mbox CA driver 6.2.3, Peak 4 & Spark XL | Kewl | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 03-21-2004 08:04 AM |
CoreAudio 6.1.1 with Spark LE and Peak LE? | jasona | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 09-20-2003 11:58 AM |
Spark 2.8XL or Peak 3.2 | bopsi | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 06-06-2003 11:03 AM |
Peak or Spark ?? | Marc Cooreman | MIDI | 0 | 03-03-2001 03:15 AM |