Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 10
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2011, 11:03 PM
Chingy Chingy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 419
Default Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

As a Logic user here, I've been quite skeptical of PT. I got PT 8 LE with my Mbox Pro 3 and when I tried it, it almost made me punch my computer. Could barely run 5 tracks on my 8-core Mac Pro before it freaked out. No delay compensation. Crippled input monitoring. Etc. etc. etc. Basically the least robust program I've ever come across.

Well, I've been trying out PT 10 for a bit now and I have to say I really quite like it. Releasing a trial was probably one of the best moves AVID could've made. Now I HAVE to use Vienna Ensemble Pro to even get by and RTAS performance is still HORRENDOUS (especially with like Eleven Free or Softube TSAR-1 - the CPU meter jumps like 10-12% when I add those plugins). The workflow however is really nice - and I LIKE Logic's workflow (in some cases I still like Logic more). The performance issues make me even more frustrated with AVID though - please please please fix those. They are holding PT back.

A few initial questions I had:
- Is there a way to bounce in place / create a new audio file with the inserts included? Some plugins don't show up in the Audiosuite menu.
- How long should delay compensation be set to usually? Does PT indicate if the setting is too low?
- Is there any way to rename all of the clips on a track based on the track name?
- Is there a way to move a clip and retain its relative position to the grid? For example, if it is just before the beat, when I try to move it in grid mode it snaps to the beat. I want to move it but maintain that relative position.

Is PT 10 worth $800 ($500 for the upgrade + $300 for VEP)? It is hard to justify to be honest, but on the other hand, the DAW is the primary tool - instead of buying another $500 plugin or $1000 hardware EQ, this would seem like a better investment. However, Logic is great for a large majority of people - lots are getting by fine with it and I'm not sure what I'd "miss" from PT (although still early days). Time will tell whether I buy it, but so far it has been quite nice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2011, 11:29 PM
filosofem filosofem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Christchurch NZ
Posts: 11,864
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- Is there a way to bounce in place / create a new audio file with the inserts included? Some plugins don't show up in the Audiosuite menu.
Pro Tools currently does not support Freeze Track or faster than real-time bounce. To Record Plug-Ins you need to Bus Record.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- How long should delay compensation be set to usually? Does PT indicate if the setting is too low?
Pro Tools 10 support ADC length of over 16,000 samples. ADC Indicator turns green, orange or red depending on the initial ADC setting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- Is there any way to rename all of the clips on a track based on the track name?
Consolidate the track.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- Is there a way to move a clip and retain its relative position to the grid?
Use Relative Grid Edit Mode.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
Is PT 10 worth $800 ($500 for the upgrade + $300 for VEP)?
Only you can answer that question but $499 USD is the Crossgrade price. $299 USD for Upgrade from Pro Tools 9.
__________________
Aaron Mulqueen - 001 HD Native
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:36 AM
AxeDye AxeDye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Riverside, CA USA
Posts: 282
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

I think its worth it just continue to test the workflow because my sessions are 16-24 tracks using maybe 30 RTAS tops and no VI's so for me pro tools 10 by itself is enough horsepower. Personally I I prefer the pro tools environemt but its what I started with and have been investing in since pro tools 6 so I am very comfortable with it. Also in my opinion the new channel strip is amazing, finally a plug in that is stock and sounds great. However I do believe Logics stock plug ins are pretty nice as we'll. But my rig is more portable and local studio like so I am not running any crazy expensive converters or anything so a cheap and good sounding stock plug in is right up my ally. Anyways good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2011, 10:43 AM
WernerF WernerF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 3,052
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

If you are familiar with the way an analoug console in an analoug studio works then Pro Tools will make total sense to you. It is based on all of the workflow and techniques that apply in this scenario. Logic is more computer first, basic recording techniques last. Of course there is lots of overlap but the concept of the basic designs differ.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2011, 01:59 PM
Cliffy_Boy's Avatar
Cliffy_Boy Cliffy_Boy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 5,091
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

The way to bounce a track with all the plug-ins is to use an Aux track. You bus the output of the track you want bounce with effects to, say, Aux In 1-2, set the Aux out, say 1-2. Set the input of the Audio track to the output 1-2 of the aux track, hit rec and wait until the track plays in real time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2011, 02:56 PM
john5193 john5193 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

My average session is 85 audio tracks 2 VI's, 7 Amp Sims, and around 140 RTAS plugs. I've tried this on multiple systems and still come back to PT handling my session better than Sonar, Cubase, and (when I still had a mac) Logic. I come from the old school analogue method so PT just looks and feels more intuitive which does help lead to better mixes (at least for me).
__________________
Wizarding Status REVOKED until I clean out my link box.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2011, 03:13 PM
Chingy Chingy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 419
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

Thanks guys. One more quick question - is there a way to set the "anchor" point of a clip? For example, for a reverse cymbal, I could set it to the end of the swell so when I drag the file, that anchor snaps to where I want it to.

John5193 - what are your computer specs? What sort of RTAS plugs are you running with those sessions? Any help is confirming my system is optimized appropriately would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2011, 03:31 PM
daeron80 daeron80 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 4,106
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

Quote:
Originally Posted by filosofem View Post
Consolidate the track.
...after duplicating the playlist so you can get back to individual clips if you need them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
is there a way to set the "anchor" point of a clip? For example, for a reverse cymbal, I could set it to the end of the swell so when I drag the file, that anchor snaps to where I want it to.
Yes, PT calls this a Sync Point. Ctrl+, on Windows. That's the control key with the comma key.
__________________
David J. Finnamore

PT 2023.12 Ultimate | Clarett+ 8Pre | macOS 13.6.3 on a MacBook Pro M1 Max
PT 2023.12 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 latest, HP Z440 64GB
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2011, 04:29 PM
mbourque mbourque is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 160
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- Is there a way to bounce in place / create a new audio file with the inserts included? Some plugins don't show up in the Audiosuite menu.
Read answers above. Just want to add that it's all in real time, there's no offline process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingy View Post
- Is there any way to rename all of the clips on a track based on the track name?
Consolidate works fine, but creates new audio files. You can select all the regions (now named clips) of the track and use the "Auto Rename" function in the clip menu of the clip window.

About the use of Vienna Ensemble Pro, the big advantage of it is that you could use the same VIs for a Logic session than a PT one (except for RTAS ones, like Eleven or Xpand). You could begin your work in Logic and then continue in PT simply by importing your MIDI tracks in the PT session. All the VIs will be in VEP.
__________________
Matthieu Bourque


PT Ultimate 2022.10 on macOS 12.6.1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2011, 06:07 PM
Chingy Chingy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 419
Default Re: Interesting...I kinda like PT 10...

Great - thank you!! These answers have really helped me out. PT's workflow is really growing on me. So flexible and powerful, but at the same time easy and intuitive. Also, strangely, even given the poor CPU efficiency, PT "feels" more robust and stable to me. Maybe a placebo effect? Who knows.

For those running VEP 5, have you tried parameter automation? I'm trying to automate Omnisphere, but VEP is really confusing in this regard. I'm guessing MIDI Learn doesn't work either when using VEP?

Also, I did a quick "performance" test - playing back a simple audio loop with Softube's TSAR-1 plugin on it duplicated as many times as possible.

Computer: Mac Pro 8-core 2.26 GHz Nehalem 8GB RAM w/ Mbox 3 Pro running at 128 buffer setting.

Logic Pro 9.1.6 64-bit: 85 tracks (AU)
Pro Tools 10 Native: 51 tracks (AAX)

Now, I believe Logic switches the buffer setting in the background to 1024, but whatever it is doing, it is getting more than 1.5x the tracks. I've also heard that for some reason the MBox 3 Pro causes more CPU issues than other FW interfaces? This performance discrepancy is the biggest worry for me right now. Wish there was a demo session I could try out that was more of a "real-world" test.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gig Success - Kinda Muzza_Boogie Eleven Rack 11 02-21-2012 02:46 PM
Need Help!!! Im kinda new to pro tools LE... rennyren 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 14 04-07-2007 11:14 PM
It's kinda sad that... Tito Ricci Arballo 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 04-14-2004 01:00 AM
Kinda off topic but... Mr Peete 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 07-22-2002 12:41 AM
kinda off topic... Mr Peete 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 01-23-2002 01:40 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com