Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Licensing & Accounts
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2015, 12:05 PM
ryanstewartguitar ryanstewartguitar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 71
Default Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Now that Pro Tools First doesn't require a physical iLok, and instead lets you store the license on your computer, do you think Pro Tools (and HD) will follow suit in the near future?

I am so careful about my iLok that I don't really like taking it on the go when I don't have to. I feel like if it wasn't required, I'd be more likely to use Pro Tools for editing/premixing tasks when I'm out. Just a thought.
__________________
- Ryan Stewart
www.ryanstewartguitar.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2015, 12:22 PM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

The only hints are the fact that Media Composer and PT First allow the asset to be stored locally. No one knows if/when it'll come to PT.
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2015, 02:33 PM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,325
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Mazurek View Post
The only hints are the fact that Media Composer and PT First allow the asset to be stored locally. No one knows if/when it'll come to PT.
And I am not holding my breath(although, in all honesty, I don't mind iLok)
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2015, 02:46 PM
take77 take77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 744
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Pro Tools l First = Free

Hence, no protection necessary.

Pro Tools full versions = Highly coveted and expensive

Therefore, iLok protection necessary (largely because a license cannot be duplicated via this means of protection).

But we all see your point. Just have to be very sensible every time you leave the house with it.

Last edited by take77; 09-14-2015 at 06:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2015, 03:16 PM
seanbil seanbil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 229
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by take77 View Post
Pro Tools l First = Free

Hence, no protection necessary.

Pro Tools full versions = Highly coveted and expensive

Therefore, iLok protection necessary (largely because a license cannot be duplicated via this means of protection).
I think the OP might have been talking about ditching the actual $50 iLok key and having iLok deposit licenses directly onto our systems. If you don't travel between different studios very often then I could see there being a benefit for allowing it just from the standpoint of not having to be subjected to the statistical failure rate of iLok USB keys.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2015, 03:35 PM
mesaone mesaone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 5,254
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Is machine activation better, aside from saving the $40 that would be spent on the dongle? I suppose you save a USB port, which is a concern for laptops.

It would all depend on how the license is stored on the machine. Could they be lost when replacing a hard drive or motherboard, or after a software update? That has happened to me with Waves and Plugin Alliance licenses. I had recourse (reset waves licenses, de-authorize the machine through PA) but with iLok who knows. I don't recall that they can offer ZDT or TLC on machines.
__________________
Pro Tools HD 12.4, Pro Tools "Vanilla" 12.4, Artist Transport, 2x Artist Mix
Studio Blue: RME UCX, Win7 Pro, i7 960, 16GB || Studio Green: RME Babyface, Win10, i7 7700HQ, 16GB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2015, 03:48 PM
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
Bob Olhsson Bob Olhsson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,519
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

A couple developers have said the iLok 2 is a lot less likely to be compromised than machine authorization so they are sticking with it.

It sucks that we need copy protection but developers need to get paid. It's too bad we don't have it for music.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346
Interview
Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2015, 04:39 PM
john1192 john1192 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 5,780
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
A couple developers have said the iLok 2 is a lot less likely to be compromised than machine authorization so they are sticking with it.

It sucks that we need copy protection but developers need to get paid. It's too bad we don't have it for music.
brillant ... iLok for music .. !!!
__________________
Macmini M1 8/512 -OS 12.3.1 and PT2022.4
Logic Pro X 10.7.4
RME BabyFace Pro

Macbook Pro july 2014 2.5ghz 16gb ram 512gb SSD - OS11.6.5 - PT 2021.3
Logic Pro X 10.7.4
RME BabyFace Pro
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2015, 06:17 PM
take77 take77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 744
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Thanks for keeping it on point. Me stating the obvious doesn't really contribute to the discussion.

Right now it's fair to say it's the most reliable method of protection for the vendor as PT11+ and others like Slate Digital remain protected.
It also allows the user to have PT on as many machines they would like and sell their system legitimately if the need be.
Meaning there is no way to activate PT on your system and then sell it while having continued use.

I'm also considering a subscription to Slate Digital. That is also iLok protected. No complaint as I completely respect Steven's products.
So until everyone drops that method of protection, iLok is the "part" in our "plugin party" among third party vendors
Protected privilege to rock with all kinds of cool plugins.

Slate Digital, for example, offers access to every single Slate D plugin for one fair priced sub and will send you a free iLok if you don't already have an iLok account.

The iLok is the "key" that starts our rock boxes! And I like the way it lights up

Ladies & Gentleman start your rock boxes!

Last edited by take77; 09-15-2015 at 12:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2015, 07:00 PM
seanbil seanbil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 229
Default Re: Any hints that we could ditch the physical iLok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by take77 View Post
The iLok is the "key" that starts our rock boxes! And I like the way it lights up
I also like the blue LED. Though I wish it could do more than just show us that it's still alive... like maybe blink to the beat of a song or change color based on its mood.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ditch the 003 console ? basslik 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 31 10-25-2015 03:32 PM
Should I ditch the MOJO? subwoof Post - Surround - Video 30 09-28-2010 01:21 PM
Any last iLok hints?? kbahjat Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) 1 03-28-2006 06:47 AM
Should i ditch the 001 for 002r? MaKoRancid 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 26 04-15-2004 09:20 AM
Ditch that noisey AMD and buy a quiet MAC! 8mmOverdose 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 7 02-25-2002 04:05 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com