Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2015, 11:00 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Phase alignment using different paths to record?

I'd like to tap the braintrust here on something regarding a specific recording scenario. (paging Propower and Rich Breen)

Has anyone tested the time alignment of a signal that travels from an Avid HD I/O or an Apogee Symphony box directly into PT vs. a signal that goes into a Presonus Digimax LT and gets into PT via a lighpipe connection?

Im trying to figure out if I can replace a Sytek 4 channel pre (that I rarely use--basically overflow pres) with a Presonus box that I also have. Just trying to simplify my setup and conserve A/D.
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2015, 09:38 AM
Rich Breen Rich Breen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Burbank, CA USA
Posts: 2,389
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Mazurek View Post
I'd like to tap the braintrust here on something regarding a specific recording scenario. (paging Propower and Rich Breen)

Has anyone tested the time alignment of a signal that travels from an Avid HD I/O or an Apogee Symphony box directly into PT vs. a signal that goes into a Presonus Digimax LT and gets into PT via a lighpipe connection?

Im trying to figure out if I can replace a Sytek 4 channel pre (that I rarely use--basically overflow pres) with a Presonus box that I also have. Just trying to simplify my setup and conserve A/D.
Hi Drew - haven't tested this particular kind of setup. Would be pretty easy to check by just multing a click into the two paths and comparing the two signals against each other. Certainly you'll be adding the Presonus' A/D and transport delays to the equation, so it won't be phase aligned with the other inputs (though it may not matter in your app) Why not check it and post here?

best,
rich
__________________
http://www.richbreen.com

----------------------------------------
Mac Studio / Ventura, PT 2023.12.HDX, Avid HD I/Os and Metric Halo ULN8, 3xS1/Dock
Also running a Mac Studio Ultra / Ventura / HDX / MTRX / S6
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2015, 10:40 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Of course Rich!! So simple. Will try that tomorrow.
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2015, 10:42 AM
propower propower is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,202
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Breen View Post
Hi Drew - haven't tested this particular kind of setup. Would be pretty easy to check by just multing a click into the two paths and comparing the two signals against each other. Certainly you'll be adding the Presonus' A/D and transport delays to the equation, so it won't be phase aligned with the other inputs (though it may not matter in your app) Why not check it and post here?

best,
rich
Exactly. But the next thing is how do you fix it? In PT you have to either manually add the right delay comp number to the track(s), manually move them, or add a plugin to do it (Metaplugin for instance - used to be a Digi Time Delay plugin for this if it's still around). What if the Presonus box is faster? The method has to support adding a negative number too
__________________
2017 27" iMac 3.8GHz i5, 1TB SSD
Logic ProX, Studio One V4, PT current version, Apogee Ensemble TB
Musician: http://www.ivanlee.net/
Design Engineer: http://www.propowerinc.com/resume.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2015, 05:56 AM
Drew Mazurek's Avatar
Drew Mazurek Drew Mazurek is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 11,629
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Presonus through an ADAT input is 36 samples later than Avid HD I/O. The pic shows a square wave, but I used a few different sound sources.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg path.jpg (28.0 KB, 0 views)
__________________
www.drewmazurek.com

Mixing and Mastering click here to get started.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2015, 11:33 AM
Rich Breen Rich Breen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Burbank, CA USA
Posts: 2,389
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Mazurek View Post
Presonus through an ADAT input is 36 samples later than Avid HD I/O. ..[/IMG]
Cool, good to know. That's at 44.1k?

Quote:
Originally Posted by propower View Post
...the next thing is how do you fix it?...
That's what Time Adjuster is for, though unless multiple mics on a single instrument/ensemble are being split across interface types (generally a bad idea), the 36 samples *may* not matter to Drew.
__________________
http://www.richbreen.com

----------------------------------------
Mac Studio / Ventura, PT 2023.12.HDX, Avid HD I/Os and Metric Halo ULN8, 3xS1/Dock
Also running a Mac Studio Ultra / Ventura / HDX / MTRX / S6
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-31-2015, 01:24 AM
Matt Hepworth's Avatar
Matt Hepworth Matt Hepworth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Phoenix or SLC
Posts: 557
Default Re: Phase alignment using different paths to record?

Little bit older thread, but I just did some testing (and solutions) for this with various scenarios.

I'm not certain the DLA plugin is available in Native like it is in TDM, since I track exclusively in TDM.

Solution:

Measure delay for converter.

Insert DLA plugin on the the fastest converters (Apogee or HD I/O)

Set it to the number of samples difference you measured

Turn OFF compensate for converter delay on input.

Use the ADC bar in the mixer view and insert the delay plus 3 samples (TDM delay) as a negative on the other converters.

The reason we do that as well is so you hear both recording and playback in phase. Otherwise, playback would be in phase, but not recording/monitoring or vice versa.

I figured this out recording drums and noticing the variation in phase when using my HD I/O with a 192 (symphony is on the fritz...).

This works perfectly. The simpler solutions will play back fine, but you'll hear phasing/comb filtering if you're splitting across converters as you monitor. Same thing if you leave the compensate for recording delay box checked.

Hopefully this helps others. You can even mult/parallel without comb filtering across various converters.

BTW, 192 is 48 samples later than HD I/O. Mackie Onyx was 6 (4 connected to the 192 instead). Apollo was 73, IIRC.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
alignment and phase for multiple kicks Macsearcher Tips & Tricks 4 11-19-2013 08:48 AM
Grid alignment Mark Ziebarth Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 12 11-02-2009 12:40 PM
Question about Sub Paths and Main paths. oulablank 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 08-15-2009 12:15 PM
phase cancellation in record mode wship 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 06-29-2007 01:55 PM
96I/O alignment ndlsd Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 10-12-2005 05:07 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com