Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Post Production > Post - Surround - Video
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2018, 10:38 AM
Preston Edmondson Preston Edmondson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2
Default Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

Hiya,

It's been common wisdom for a very long time to keep separate drives for video and audio playback. I've kept a separate video drive since the SCSI days, and I well understand the reasons that has been the standard way of working for so long.

However my experience over the past year (since upgrading to v12 and Sierra) has been that I get better performance playing from a single session folder on a single USB3 SSD, than I do when separating audio and video out among multiple drives. Pro Tools seems more responsive and snappy doing it this way (to me).

What is Avid's current official advisement on separate video drives? Is this just more of a workflow preference nowadays than something which is necessary? Is it in fact true that performance is improved using a single session folder for playback, or am I just imagining the improvement?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2018, 05:53 AM
MIKEROPHONICS's Avatar
MIKEROPHONICS MIKEROPHONICS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CRANLEIGH (gateway to the Surrey Hiils), UK
Posts: 2,094
Default Re: Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

I suspect you are imagining it - but having said that I have been running this way for years with no issues. I do it for file management and back up ease.
I use an AJA IOXT and have few problems


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
cheers

Mike Aiton BSc (hons)
Audio Consultant, Dubbing Mixer/Sound Designer & Journalist

BAFTA member
IPS member

----------------------------------------------------------------------
www.mikerophonics.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2018, 08:01 AM
Reckless Erik Reckless Erik is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Reykjavik,Iceland
Posts: 811
Default Re: Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

Separate video drives have not been in use here for years now. We haven't found any real drop in performance and having everything in the same place is a big plus.
__________________
[email protected]
Newcomer Audio Post
MacBookPro 2.3GHz i7 16GB RAM OSX 10.15.7, PT Ultimate 2023.12 HDn, MTRX Studio, 2x Avid S1, PT Dock...
Mac M1 Studio Ultra 64GB RAM OSX 13.6, PT Ultimate 2023.12 HDn, MTRX Studio, 2x Avid S1, PT Dock...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2018, 08:54 AM
MIKEROPHONICS's Avatar
MIKEROPHONICS MIKEROPHONICS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CRANLEIGH (gateway to the Surrey Hiils), UK
Posts: 2,094
Default Re: Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

Especially with the ram cache


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
cheers

Mike Aiton BSc (hons)
Audio Consultant, Dubbing Mixer/Sound Designer & Journalist

BAFTA member
IPS member

----------------------------------------------------------------------
www.mikerophonics.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2018, 07:33 AM
MusoPro's Avatar
MusoPro MusoPro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jerusalem,Israel
Posts: 409
Default Re: Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

Actually I still do, not for speed but it makes things a lot less messy for me. I am constantly updating video versions during mixing. Each client has their own video folder with folders for each project....not only that but working with DnX files can get take up disk space super fast....I usually trash the video files at some point and backup just the Pro Tools session....the client 99.99% of the time has the video if I ever need it for possible broadcast changes.

Works for me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Best

Mitch

MacPro 2.44 8 Core


Mac OSX 10.10.5
PT 12.7
HD Native
SyncHD I/O
HD I/O
MIDI I/O
C24
Aja LiHi
Surround Setup
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2018, 08:15 AM
Rich Breen Rich Breen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Burbank, CA USA
Posts: 2,390
Default Re: Separate video drive vs. session's Video Files folder

One thing to add to the equation; Studios are starting to ask that any drive with picture needs to be encrypted, and needs to be in a secure vault when not in use. Also, when a picture drive is on the system, the system needs to be unplugged from the network - for me, since I'd rather not have audio on an encrypted drive, that means separate picture drives. As far as performance, I've never really noticed a significant hit from having picture on the audio drive as long as disk caching is being used.
__________________
http://www.richbreen.com

----------------------------------------
Mac Studio / Ventura, PT 2023.12.HDX, Avid HD I/Os and Metric Halo ULN8, 3xS1/Dock
Also running a Mac Studio Ultra / Ventura / HDX / MTRX / S6
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Import video AND copy it to session folder? kirkbross Pro Tools 11 5 10-16-2015 02:59 PM
Separate video hard drive Gohanto Post - Surround - Video 5 04-12-2011 10:00 PM
Video Files not copying to Video Folder. Danielsun 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 12-13-2009 12:31 PM
Video Files Folder audioplace estudios 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 05-07-2009 02:41 PM
"Video Files" folder? Bryan Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 9 11-17-2001 08:48 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com