Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 9
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 05-21-2011, 03:16 PM
Noiselab Noiselab is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 228
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Confirmed. The PF610 does support headphone monitoring in stand-alone mode, but obviously, you need to have the line-lump power supply plugged in to do anything in stand-alone...

NL
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-24-2011, 11:04 PM
smpkeys smpkeys is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 193
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Anyone know if this unit will get down to a H/W Buffer size of 32 samples?
Or is 64 the lowest?
__________________
2010 Mac Pro, 3.46 GHz 6 Core Xeon,32 GB RAM, OSX 10.9.5, PT 12.4, RME Fireface UFX, Command 8, Mytek 8x192, SSD evo on System,Audio&Samples on spinner drives WD SATA 64mb Cache
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-25-2011, 03:27 AM
Obsidian Dragon Obsidian Dragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,524
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Quote:
Originally Posted by smpkeys View Post
Anyone know if this unit will get down to a H/W Buffer size of 32 samples?
Or is 64 the lowest?
Are you asking about the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56? (this thread has wandered lately). If so, I can not get to 32 samples. 64 is the lowest I get.
__________________
Obsidian Dragon
MacbookPro14,3 - Intel Core i7 3.1 GHz, 16 GB
MacOS 13.6.6 running Protools 2024.3.1

Mac Studio M1Max - 64GB
MacOS 14.4.1 running Protools 2024.3.1
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-25-2011, 06:55 AM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,334
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsidian Dragon View Post
Are you asking about the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56? (this thread has wandered lately). If so, I can not get to 32 samples. 64 is the lowest I get.
This is interesting as Mac users can get 32 using either 002 or 003 interface. Would be good to hear what PC users get for lowest buffer(since O.D. runs a Mac)
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-25-2011, 07:24 AM
aka21stCentury aka21stCentury is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Loma Prieta Fault
Posts: 779
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Thanx noiselab. Sorry about the OT posts.

I find this quote from RME's website interesting re: the UC
Quote:
Based on a newly developed RME Hammerfall core the Fireface UC provides revolutionary ultra-low latencies even with multiple channels. It uses two different firmware versions with different transfer methods to remove current restrictions of typical USB audio interfaces. The unit's operating mode Win or Mac can be changed directly at the unit at any time. Under Mac OS the Fireface's MIDI ports are class compliant, the operating system therefore automatically uses the included MIDI driver. Under both Operating Systems the available latencies* are simply sensational. The smallest buffer offered under Windows has 48 samples, under Mac OS X 14 samples. With this RME provides a performance previously not available from USB audio interfaces.
RME makes more than a few subtle hints that MS should take a cue from Apple's playbook. This is a USB interface with pretty exception latency values. I've been more concerned about MIDI latency and if anyone is interested in continuing that discussion the thread is open at the MIDI area here.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:08 AM
WKG WKG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsidian Dragon View Post
Are you asking about the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56? (this thread has wandered lately). If so, I can not get to 32 samples. 64 is the lowest I get.

Same here, 64, on PC.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-25-2011, 10:01 AM
aka21stCentury aka21stCentury is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Loma Prieta Fault
Posts: 779
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

A bit OT, but RME's UC and Babyface must be using USB-2 Isosynchronous Mode. Occasionally a USB hub may revert back to USB 1.1 and then 2.0 is unavailable. So a lot depends on the manufacturer of the USB hub or the drivers for the hub. RME keeps hinting it is the OS itself, so who knows...

Those figures from RME must be 'best case scenario'. Generally I have been avoiding mixing the rear USB hubs, keeping 1.1 devices together and not mixing protocols.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-26-2011, 05:03 PM
WKG WKG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Here's a link to the Focusrite Beta public site for anybody who is interested. Quite a few new betas of mix control, drivers and the RTAS plug. I was wondering where that was, couldn't find it anywhere on their main site.

http://beta.focusrite.com/
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-27-2011, 05:38 AM
appledude appledude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Round Rock Texas
Posts: 220
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Saffire 56 now can be set at 32 samples for a buffer in 9.03 :)
__________________
Imac Pro 27" 10-core with a LG 4K for a second screen
OS 10.14.4
Pro Tools 2019.6
UAD Apollo X8P With an extra 8 channel ADAT using
a Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56
UAD Twin duo
UAD TB3 Octo Satelite
Focal Twin Be monitors
samsung T5 and Gdrive
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-27-2011, 06:15 AM
Sharmel Sharmel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 16
Default Re: Considering a Saffire 56. Opinions wanted

Quote:
Originally Posted by appledude View Post
Saffire 56 now can be set at 32 samples for a buffer in 9.03 :)
Wow..i hope it's the same with Saffire 40 as well.
__________________
Win7x64
PT 9.0.6
ASRock P67 Extreme6, i7 2600k, 8Gb
Focusrite Saffire 40 Pro
Eleven Rack + EXRP
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions On Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56 cwsand Windows 3 06-03-2011 08:50 PM
Opinions wanted: P4 2.8 ghz to Powerbook 1.25 ghz? 72reissue 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 8 06-23-2004 04:16 PM
Opinions wanted: P4 2.8 ghz to Powerbook 1.25 ghz? 72reissue 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 06-23-2004 02:15 PM
Opinions wanted tonyharp 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 1 11-13-2002 02:42 PM
Help!! -- Dell Users Opinions Wanted! htbrady 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 0 02-05-2001 01:11 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com