Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools M-Powered (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2010, 05:05 AM
BenGra BenGra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4
Default Problems with bus sends.

Has anyone had this problem?

I have my drum overheads on a stereo channel. This has some effects on it.

I create a stereo AUX channel, make the input Bus 1-2.
I put a send on my drum overhead channel to Bus 1-2.

I set that send to PRE, and unity gain.

When I solo the new AUX channel, I hear all the effects that are on the drum overhead channel, rather than clean audio !?

I've just upgraded to PT8, this didn't used to happen in PT7.1.

In PT7.1, the AUX channel would be clean audio, with none of the effects from the original on.

Any ideas ?!?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2010, 09:19 AM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,326
Default Re: Problems with bus sends.

A little more info might help here. You say you send(via AUX send) to an AUX track....so what is the purpose of the AUX track? Does it have some effect plugin inserted? Are you aware of the Solo-safe function? on any track(all types except Master) you can Ctrl-click on the solo button to "solo-safe" that track. So now, whenever you solo any track, the solo-safed tracks continue to be heard(I usually solo-safe my reverb and delay tracks).

Okay, I re-read your post and I think I have it now. You have effects on your overhead tracks and you are using a pre-fader send so you have dry sound coming from your AUX track? I would change your procedure a bit here. Leave the overhead track dry, send(with a POST-fader send) to your stereo AUX track and insert the effect on the AUX track. Now the original overhead track is dry, and your AUX track is wet(reverbs should be run this way and at 100% wet for 95% of normal mixing). Of course, there ARE reasons to do it otherwise, but for traditional mixing, one would generally put the effects on an AUX track and send as I described in this second part of my reply. Play around with both variants and I think you will feel smarter afterwards.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2010, 10:10 AM
Keybeeetsss's Avatar
Keybeeetsss Keybeeetsss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Memphis
Posts: 8,759
Default Re: Problems with bus sends.

Yeah the way ur doin that is a bit odd; not sure why u would do it that way unless its on eq & compression; if its more than that, e.g. Pre-Delay or Verb|Room, that u should want on the Aux...

Nevertheless, I'm not sure why ur hearing the effects only tho when u solo...
__________________
MYSPACE ON'EIM
LAUTEN MICS & ME
DA'TUBE ON'EIM

'IS TAMARA HOME'
NO, SHE'S WITH
HOBO KEY
'' (that dopey green thing)

('we' must start using pronouns)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-30-2010, 05:34 PM
BenGra BenGra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4
Default Re: Problems with bus sends.

Hi guys,

Yeah I know it's not the best way to do it - but it's an example more than anything. I don't usually put my reverbs on like this, I do it the way you've outlined.

But the question still remains - is the send from a channel supposed to include whatever plugins are on that channel? I thought it sent raw audio, without any plugs on it.

I came across this when I wanted to do some parallel compression. I noticed the AUX track, that I was going to put the heavy compression on, was playing the effects that the original track had on, rather than a dry/raw signal.

What is your experience in this situation? Does a 'sent' signal have the effects on it?

I swear PT7.1 didn't ?!

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:23 AM
lcsper lcsper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 17
Default Re: Problems with bus sends.

I think when you hit PRE on the sends that just means its Pre-fader, meaning it will take the signal before it hits the fader and send it, with all the processing done on that signal.
__________________
Pro Tools M-Powered 8.0.4
M-Audio Profire 2626
Sager NP9262 Mobile Workstation
-Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.0GHz
-4 GB DDR2 800 RAM
-Dual GeForce 9800MGT SLI
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sends default to -inf preference...resetting all sends to 0 Nathan W. Post - Surround - Video 3 07-15-2011 12:10 PM
Problems with SOUND, AUX, and SENDS dr166006 Post - Surround - Video 3 01-22-2009 02:12 PM
post fader- sends and returns-problems hitwriter 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 05-18-2005 09:52 AM
post fader- sends and returns-problems hitwriter 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 1 05-16-2005 01:27 PM
PL 6.1 Problems with Sends, Mutes, etc. press 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 08-04-2003 09:02 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com