Benefits of interface for can-centric workflow

[blindsidejamie]

hi all

I'm running native PT Ultimate just out of the MBP headphone jack. I only do post editorial at home. Dial, foley, and some FX editing -- simple sessions.

I'm curious if there is a big incentive to invest in a Thunderbolt/USB interface if it's a modest system for occasional (that can expand?) work? Better headphone output level? Huge quality difference? I have Beyerdynamics 770 PRO 250 ohm cans.

Thanks for your input

[smurfyou]

I also do post editorial at home with DT770’s. I’m surprised you’re driving them with the built-in output. With an internal sound card I had to use “normal” impedance cans And I hear noise and interference with both Mac and PC laptops.

So I always use an interface. I have the usual rack mount interface at home but I have a couple of tiny USB boxes that I use for travel or when I need an extra seat. Used to use the Mbox mini but drivers were terrible. Nowadays anything from Presonus and Focusrite is good enough. Steinberg, Roland, Tascam. Honestly they all use similar quality components and they’re cheap as chips when you’re making a living using them. The quality difference is worth it for me. Spending more will get you more features and I/O but not necessarily a better headphone amp. Stepping up to an RME Babyface would be an improvement but only worth it if you need the extras.