Quote:
Originally Posted by dtmprod
Latency is usually proportional to the sample setting. Going from 128 to 256 means the latency at 256 is double what it was at 128. If you're switching from 128 to 512, its gonna be 4 times as much latency. And so on....
|
Don't think thats correct. His latency on the track without delay comp. enabled will be the track latency plus the buffer latency. What he is hearing is not increased track latency, but the increased buffer latency, right? Let me know if I am missing something.
Latency is relative to sample rate, btw, not sample setting, I believe. Higher sample rates are less latent by design. e.g. 10 samples at 192kHz go by quicker in time than 10 samples at 96kHz.
mightyduck