Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Live Sound > VENUE Live Sound Systems
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2009, 10:38 PM
Jon Martin Jon Martin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL.
Posts: 34
Default Upwards Compression

I like to start a discussion carried over from the Webinar.

Robert, if you could please go back over the workflow and explain this in a little more detail. I know time was running short on the Webinar.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:13 AM
mackerr mackerr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 18
Default Re: Upwards Compression

That was my question as well. What other applications would the technique apply to, and does it alway need to include FX? What is the advantage of feeding the FX from both the clean and compressed channels?

Mac
__________________
Audio plumber since 1976
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:18 AM
Scott Fahy Scott Fahy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 400
Default Re: Upwards Compression

It looked to me the example in the webinar is for 1 channel only. If you want to do kick, snare, rack and floor mics do you have to use the dummy alignment channel for each one? or is there another way to approach it.

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:27 PM
Jon Martin Jon Martin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL.
Posts: 34
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Fahy View Post
It looked to me the example in the webinar is for 1 channel only. If you want to do kick, snare, rack and floor mics do you have to use the dummy alignment channel for each one? or is there another way to approach it.

Scott
I saw it as whatever you want to drive with the aux would go to your 'processing' and returned back as a compressed / effected signal to blend with the dry or 'un-processed' signal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2009, 02:35 PM
Scott Fahy Scott Fahy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 400
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Martin View Post
I saw it as whatever you want to drive with the aux would go to your 'processing' and returned back as a compressed / effected signal to blend with the dry or 'un-processed' signal.
Ok then I am confused, I listened to that section again and Robert said that if you use an AUX to drive the comps/eq's when you return it to the console that signal will be late and create combing. He was using group routing to do the upwards compression......or that was what i got from it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2009, 03:18 PM
RScovill RScovill is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 27
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackerr View Post
That was my question as well. What other applications would the technique apply to, and does it alway need to include FX? What is the advantage of feeding the FX from both the clean and compressed channels?

Mac
Mackerr -- in regards to what other instruments you would use UC on -- I've certainly used it more on drums than anything -- but -- in the analog world, I've regularly done it with a lead vocal - especially for rock/metal where I would add a compressed version of the signal with 1176LN@ 20:1 - medium/fast attack -- super fast release to good effect. You just have to be very careful with using extreme compressions on vocals because of it's effect on gain before feedback etc. I've also used it alot on guitar sounds where I'll have a basic rhythm level and tone, but add a very compressed/eq'ed/effected signal to the rhythm sound for solos and hooks etc. Makes it so you can get the guitar loud quickly with out it hurting.
Frankly it's still easier to implement in analog -- but you can do it on VENUE with the method that I showed in the webinar.
__________________
Market Manager
Live Sound Products
Digidesign
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2009, 03:21 PM
RScovill RScovill is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 27
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Fahy View Post
It looked to me the example in the webinar is for 1 channel only. If you want to do kick, snare, rack and floor mics do you have to use the dummy alignment channel for each one? or is there another way to approach it.

Scott
Scott -- I only showed one channel because of space limiations. It can be as many channels as you like though. I usually send kick in/out, snare top/bottom and toms to that compressed group. I use a stereo group for both groups so that they only follow one pan setting and add correctly in terms of their spacial postion. And no -- you only need one alignment channel to force the proper delay compensation.
__________________
Market Manager
Live Sound Products
Digidesign
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2009, 03:27 PM
RScovill RScovill is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 27
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Fahy View Post
Ok then I am confused, I listened to that section again and Robert said that if you use an AUX to drive the comps/eq's when you return it to the console that signal will be late and create combing. He was using group routing to do the upwards compression......or that was what i got from it.
Yeah -- correct, you shouldn't use an aux to do this - you should use a group. Now, that said, what you can do, is use Vari-Groups to do this. This allows you to have pre or post fader level control over the signals going to the group master. (I would suggest post personally) Then assign the groups to the LR per normal. In Vari-Groups you can link two mono groups and have them follow your input pan as well -- so this can work really great in that you can, for instance have less bass drum dictating the compression by simply turning it down in the Vari-Group (aux). Just for me personally though -- I prefer to have more than 8 mono groups -- prefer 8 stereo minimum.
__________________
Market Manager
Live Sound Products
Digidesign

Last edited by RScovill; 01-29-2009 at 03:38 PM. Reason: misstated sentence --
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2009, 03:36 PM
RScovill RScovill is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 27
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Martin View Post
I saw it as whatever you want to drive with the aux would go to your 'processing' and returned back as a compressed / effected signal to blend with the dry or 'un-processed' signal.
You're close here -- the matrix simply serves as an addition/blending point for the uncompressed signals (via the aux) and the compressed signals (via the group) to be delivered to your effects processing. The return channel is 100% wet effects and is assigned to the uncompressed group. (you can't assign it to the compressed group or you will get a feedback loop) Get me?
__________________
Market Manager
Live Sound Products
Digidesign
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2009, 04:34 PM
Scott Fahy Scott Fahy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 400
Default Re: Upwards Compression

Quote:
Originally Posted by RScovill View Post
Yeah -- correct, you shouldn't use an aux to do this - you should use a group. Now, that said, what you can do, is use Vari-Groups to do this. This allows you to have pre or post fader level control over the signals going to the group master. (I would suggest post personally) Then assign the groups to the LR per normal. In Vari-Groups you can link two mono groups and have them follow your input pan as well -- so this can work really great in that you can, for instance have less bass drum dictating the compression by simply turning it down in the Vari-Group (aux). Just for me personally though -- I prefer to have more than 8 mono groups -- prefer 8 stereo minimum.
I've been using the stereo group approach but not the dummy alignment channel, the timing was really close since I was doing some time offset on every channel to align things within the drums (Dave Stagl had a nifty Excel program that allows you to enter all the plug ins and calculate things very nicely). I'll try adding the align channel next time I mix and see if it cleans up the timing even more
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New guy here. Compression? Phlacc 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 01-27-2010 06:07 AM
updating from 7.3 upwards yanncrusoe 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 10-08-2007 11:13 AM
updating from 7.3 upwards yanncrusoe 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 10-08-2007 11:13 AM
Bouncing upwards Kawi Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 11-11-2005 04:08 AM
Compression CRM-114 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 06-13-2003 03:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com