|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
Here is a link with my sandra report http://www.zshare.net/download/643482829f4bcffe/
***** Start of Report ***** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <<< Server Status >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: SiSoftware Sandra Lite [Evaluation] (x86) Version: 2009.9.15.124 Copyright: Copyright © SiSoftware 1995-Present. All Rights Reserved. Registered Owner: PAUL Registered Organisation: ACASA DEOCAMDATA Licence Status: Evaluation copy, strictly for personal/ educational use only. For business/commercial use, it can be trialled for 21 days. Licence Extra: You are on day %i of your evaluation period. Please see the SiSoftware site (http:// www.sisoftware.co.uk) for purchase details. URL: http://www.sisoftware.net/sandra/ E-Mail: [email protected] Host Name: acasa-5d02f4d9c User: PAUL System ID: {9414A68C-5029-4C75-8F8F-87D7C72E485F} Result ID: {357502E8-61B9-4F3F-A255-5AF6F1C7C313} Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:57:46 PM <<< Report Comments >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <<< Computer Overview >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < Computer > Model: System manufacturer System Product Name Workgroup: WORKGROUP Host Name: acasa-5d02f4d9c User: PAUL < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Threads per Core: 1 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Computer > Mainboard: Asus P5Q SE2 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. 0406 10/07/2008 Bus(es): ISA X-Bus PCI PCIe IMB USB i2c/SMBus Multi-Processor (MP) Support: No Multi-Processor Advanced PIC (:Yes Total Memory: 3GB DIMM DDR2 < Chipset > Model: ASUS P45/P43/G45/G43 DRAM Controller Front Side Bus Speed: 4x 334MHz (1.34GHz) Total Memory: 3GB DIMM DDR2 Memory Bus Speed: 2x 334MHz (668MHz) < Memory Module(s) > Memory Module: Kingmax KLCD48F-A8KB5 1GB DIMM DDR2 PC2-5300U DDR2-666 (5-5-5-15 3-20-5-3) Memory Module: Kingmax KLCE88F-B8KU5 2GB DIMM DDR2 PC2-5300U DDR2-666 (5-5-5-15 3-20-5-3) < Video System > Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT (32 SP 1.1GHz, 512MB DDR2 2x400MHz, PCIe 1.00 x16) < Storage Devices > WDC WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 (160GB, :149GB (C:) (D:) ST3640323AS (640.1GB, SATA300,:596GB (G:) HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-H10N (ATA3:N/A (E:) IT6253Q BAR213T (SCSI, SCSI-2,:535MB (F:) IT6253Q BAR213T (SCSI, SCSI-2,:N/A (H:) < Logical Storage Devices > Hard Disk (C:): 49GB (NTFS) @ WDC WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 (160GB, SATA300, 3.5", 7200rpm, NCQ, 8MB Cache) Hard Disk (D:): 100GB (NTFS) @ WDC WD1600AAJS-00PSA0 (160GB, SATA300, 3.5", 7200rpm, NCQ, 8MB Cache) Local Disk (G:): 596GB (NTFS) @ ST3640323AS (640.1GB, SATA300, 3.5", 7200rpm, NCQ) Optical Drive (E:): N/A @ HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-H10N (ATA33, DVD+- RW, CD-RW, 2MB Cache) Acoustic Guitar (F:): 535MB (CDFS) @ IT6253Q BAR213T (SCSI, SCSI-2, DVD+-R-DL, CD-R, 512kB Cache) Optical Drive (H:): N/A @ IT6253Q BAR213T (SCSI, SCSI-2, DVD+-R- DL, CD-R, 512kB Cache) 3.5" 1.44MB (A:): N/A < Peripherals > LPC Hub Controller 1: ASUS LPC Interface Controller LPC Legacy Controller 1: T0 A5-13h Audio Device: ASUS HD Audio Controller Audio Device: VIA M Audio Audiophile Serial Port(s): 1 Disk Controller: ASUS 4 port SATA IDE Controller Disk Controller: ASUS 2 port SATA IDE Controller Disk Controller: ASUS 6101 SATA2 Controller USB Controller 1: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #4 USB Controller 2: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #5 USB Controller 3: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #6 USB Controller 4: ASUS USB EHCI Controller #2 USB Controller 5: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #1 USB Controller 6: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #2 USB Controller 7: ASUS USB UHCI Controller #3 USB Controller 8: ASUS USB EHCI Controller #1 SMBus/i2c Controller 1: Intel 801xx/63xx SMBus < Printers and Faxes > Printer: Microsoft Office Document Image Writer Driver (300x300, Colour) < Network Services > Network Adapter: Realtek RTL8168C(P)/8111C(P) PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC - Packet Scheduler Miniport (Ethernet, 100Mbps) < Power Management > Mains (AC) Line Status: On-Line < Operating System > Windows System: Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.01.2600 (Service Pack 2) Platform Compliance: x86 <<< Processor Arithmetic >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < Benchmark Results > Aggregate Arithmetic Performan:39.74GOPS Dhrystone ALU: 42.86GIPS Whetstone iSSE3: 36.61GFLOPS Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > Aggregate Arithmetic Performan:15.84MOPS/MHz Dhrystone ALU: 17.09MIPS/MHz Whetstone iSSE3: 14.60MFLOPS/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W Aggregate Arithmetic Performan:316.45MOPS/W Dhrystone ALU: 341.35MIPS/W Whetstone iSSE3: 291.57MFLOPS/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:Yes Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark:No Processor Affinity: P0C0T0 P0C1T0 P0C2T0 P0C3T0 System Timer: 2.5GHz Number of Runs: 64000 / 640 < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Features > SSE Technology: Yes SSE2 Technology: Yes SSE3 Technology: Yes Supplemental SSE3 Technology: Yes SSE4.1 Technology: Yes SSE4.2 Technology: No AVX - Advanced Vector eXtensio:No FMA - Fused Multiply/Add eXten:No SSE4A Technology: No FMA4 - 4 Operands Fused Multip:No HTT - Hyper-Threading Technolo:No < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. <<< Processor Multi-Media >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < Benchmark Results > Aggregate Multi-Media Performa:72.6MPixel/s Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1: 93MPixel/s Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2: 52.25MPixel/s Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2: 26.27MPixel/s Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > Aggregate Multi-Media Performa:28.95kPixels/s/MHz Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1: 37.07kPixels/s/MHz Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2: 20.83kPixels/s/MHz Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2: 10.47kPixels/s/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W Aggregate Multi-Media Performa:578.22kPixels/s/W Multi-Media Int x8 iSSE4.1: 740.33kPixels/s/W Multi-Media Float x4 iSSE2: 416.12kPixels/s/W Multi-Media Double x2 iSSE2: 209.21kPixels/s/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:Yes Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark:No Processor Affinity: P0C0T0 P0C1T0 P0C2T0 P0C3T0 System Timer: 2.5GHz Rendered Image Size: 1920x1080 < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Features > SSE Technology: Yes SSE2 Technology: Yes SSE3 Technology: Yes Supplemental SSE3 Technology: Yes SSE4.1 Technology: Yes SSE4.2 Technology: No AVX - Advanced Vector eXtensio:No FMA - Fused Multiply/Add eXten:No SSE4A Technology: No FMA4 - 4 Operands Fused Multip:No HTT - Hyper-Threading Technolo:No < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. <<< Multi-Core Efficiency >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < Benchmark Results > Inter-Core Bandwidth: 9.8GB/s Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. Inter-Core Latency: 53ns Results Interpretation: Lower index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > Inter-Core Bandwidth: 4.01MB/s/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. Inter-Core Latency: 0.02ns/MHz Results Interpretation: Lower index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W Inter-Core Bandwidth: 80.00MB/s/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. Inter-Core Latency: 0.42ns/W Results Interpretation: Lower index values are better. < Capacity vs Power > Total Cache Size: 166.03kB/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Detailed Benchmark Results > Processor Affinity: CPU0-CPU1 CPU2-CPU3 2x8kB Blocks Bandwidth: 8GB/s 4x8kB Blocks Bandwidth: 8.78GB/s 2x32kB Blocks Bandwidth: 10.59GB/s 4x32kB Blocks Bandwidth: 21.44GB/s 16x8kB Blocks Bandwidth: 20.36GB/s 2x128kB Blocks Bandwidth: 22.1GB/s 4x128kB Blocks Bandwidth: 22.17GB/s 16x32kB Blocks Bandwidth: 21.71GB/s 64x8kB Blocks Bandwidth: 20.35GB/s 16x128kB Blocks Bandwidth: 2.31GB/s 64x32kB Blocks Bandwidth: 3GB/s 64x128kB Blocks Bandwidth: 1.6GB/s < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 Buffering Used: No NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:Yes Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 System Timer: 2.5GHz Page Size: 4kB Use Large Memory Pages: No < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 11: Use the 'Switch Chart Type' button to switch between Detailed and Combined charts. Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
<<< Power Management Efficiency >>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- << ALU Power Performance >> << 50i/25Hz (25fps, e.g. interlaced PAL video) >> < Benchmark Results > ALU Power Performance: 12.8GIPS Power Efficiency: 0.00 Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > ALU Power Performance: 5.11MIPS/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W ALU Power Performance: 101.98MIPS/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < APM System Status > Mains (AC) Line Status: On-Line Processor Dynamic Throttle Pol:None Optimised for Performance: Yes < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:No Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark:No Processor Affinity: P0C0T0 P0C1T0 P0C2T0 P0C3T0 System Timer: 2.5GHz < Breakdown at 500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 5000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 6000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 7000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 8000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 9000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 10000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 11000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 12000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 13000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 14000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 15000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 16500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 18000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 19500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 21000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 22500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 24000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 25500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 27000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 28500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 30000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 32000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 1108: Processor power policy not optimal. For best power management efficiency, choose the adaptive mode. Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. << 60i/30Hz (29.97fps, e.g. interlaced NTSC video) >> < Benchmark Results > ALU Power Performance: 12.8GIPS Power Efficiency: 0.00 Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > ALU Power Performance: 5.11MIPS/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W ALU Power Performance: 101.98MIPS/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < APM System Status > Mains (AC) Line Status: On-Line Processor Dynamic Throttle Pol:None Optimised for Performance: Yes < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:No Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark:No Processor Affinity: P0C0T0 P0C1T0 P0C2T0 P0C3T0 System Timer: 2.5GHz < Breakdown at 500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 5000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 6000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 7000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 8000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 9000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 10000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 11000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 12000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 13000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 14000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 15000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 16500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 18000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 19500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 21000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 22500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 24000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 25500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 27000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 28500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 30000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 32000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Processor > Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 1108: Processor power policy not optimal. For best power management efficiency, choose the adaptive mode. Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. << 50p (50fps, e.g. progressive PAL video) >> < Benchmark Results > ALU Power Performance: 12.8GIPS Power Efficiency: 0.00 Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Speed > ALU Power Performance: 5.11MIPS/MHz Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < Performance vs. Power > Processor(s) Power: 125.57W ALU Power Performance: 101.98MIPS/W Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. < APM System Status > Mains (AC) Line Status: On-Line Processor Dynamic Throttle Pol:None Optimised for Performance: Yes < Performance Test Status > Result ID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz (4C, 2.5GHz, 2x 2MB L2, 1.34GHz FSB) Platform Compliance: x86 NUMA Support: No SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmar:No Total Test Threads: 4 Multi-Core Test: Yes Cores per Processor: 4 SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark:No Processor Affinity: P0C0T0 P0C1T0 P0C2T0 P0C3T0 System Timer: 2.5GHz < Breakdown at 500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 1500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 2500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 3500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 4500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 5000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 6000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 7000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 8000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 9000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 10000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 11000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 12000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 13000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 14000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 15000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 16500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 18000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 19500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 21000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 22500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 24000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 25500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 27000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 28500 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) < Breakdown at 30000 MIPS Workload > Average Clock Ratio: 100% (2.5GHz) Average Voltage Ratio: 100% (1.138V) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
< Processor >
Model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz Speed: 2.5GHz Peak Processing Performance (P:40.13GFLOPS Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:12WG Cores per Processor: 4 Unit(s) Type: Quad-Core Integrated Data Cache: 4x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size L2 On-board Cache: 2x 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing < Performance Tips > Notice 5008: To change benchmarks, click Options. Notice 5004: Synthetic benchmark. May not tally with 'real- life' performance. Notice 5006: Only compare the results with ones obtained using the same version! Tip 1108: Processor power policy not optimal. For best power management efficiency, choose the adaptive mode. Tip 2: Double-click tip or press Enter while a tip is selected for more information about the tip. << 60p (59.94fps, e.g. progressive NTSC video) >> |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
I did a screen capture with the message and with the four cores usage being to 100 %.
http://www.zshare.net/image/64350282f4942044/ |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
I disabled the virtual drives.
You mean that Ram aren't placed in the corect slots ? or that they are not compatible with each other ? What to do ? |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
Quote:
Check my signature...
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
No, they should be matched... 2GB and 2GB. same/same. Not one 1GB stick and one 2GB stick.
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
Even if i disable and close all those things i got the same problem. And even so with a 2,5 ghz quad core they should all work.
One thing that i forgot to mention is that i didn't reinstalled windows when i changed motherboard and processor. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Which processor is better for Pro Tools M-powered
Quote:
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mac osx, m powered fast track, pro tools m powered | singdance6 | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 2 | 12-22-2010 09:24 AM |
Please Advise are Pro Tools M-Powered Essential the same as LE M-Powered? | jeremiah0812 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 10-19-2010 10:10 AM |
optimizing processor power for PT M-Powered | nonsqtr | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 1 | 10-03-2010 03:03 PM |
Help building a quiet quad processor PC for M-powered. | headswimmer | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 0 | 05-20-2008 01:29 AM |
M-Powered on Cube with faster processor? | John Link | Pro Tools M-Powered (Mac) | 5 | 03-04-2006 06:30 PM |